Research performance management in academe

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 273-287

  Manning, Linda M ^a   Barrette, Jacques ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Business school; Cultural diversity; Performance management; Research incentive programs; Research productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646502408     PISSN: 08250383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1936-4490.2005.tb00374.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aksnes, D.W. (2003). A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics, 56 (2), 235-246.
2. Anseel, F., Duyck, W., De Baene, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Journal impact factors and self-citations: Implications for psychology. American Psychologist, 59 (1), 49-51.
3. Baltagi, B. H. (2003). Worldwide institutional and individual rankings in econometrics over the period 1989-1999: An update. Econometric Theory, 19, 165-224.
4. Borokhovich, K.A., Bricker, R.J., Brunarski, K.R., & Simkins, B.J. (1995). Finance research productivity and influence. Journal of Finance, 50, 1691-1717.
5. Benjamin, J.J. & Brenner, V.C. (1974). Perceptions of journal quality. Accounting Review, 49 (2), 360-362.
6. Brown, L.D. & Huefner, R.J. (1994). The familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals: Views of senior accounting faculty in leading U.S. MBA programs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11 (1-1), 223-250.
7. Cabell's Directory of Publishing Opportunities (various issues). (2000). 8th Edition. Beaumont, TX: Cabell Publishing Co.
8. Carter, C.R. (2002). Assessing logistics and transportation journals: Alternative perspectives. Transportation Journal, 42 (2), 39-50.
9. Diamond, R.M. (1993). Changing priorities and the faculty reward system. In R.M. Diamond & B.E. Adam (Eds.), Recognizing faculty work: Reward systems for the year 2000, (pp. 5-12). New Directions for Higher Education, no. 81. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Erkut, E. (2002). Measuring Canadian business school research output and impact. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 19 (2), 97-123.
11. Financial Times. (2002). Top 100 business schools. Retrieved from http://specials.ft.com/spdocs/FT31UUB8MWC.pdf
12. Forgionne, G.A. & Kohli, R. (2000). A multiple criteria assessment of decision technology system journal quality. Information & Management, 38, 421-435.
13. Gomez-Mejia, L.R. & Balkin, D.B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 921-955.
14. Gosselin, A. & Murphy, K.R. (1994). L'échec de l'évaluation de la performance. Gestion, revue internationale de gestion, 19 (3), 17-28.
15. Grant, H. (1998). Merit pay in Canadian universities. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 53 (4), 647-666.
16. Harzig, A.W. (2004). Journal quality list. Retrieved from http://www.harzing.com/resources.htm#jql
17. Holsapple, C.W., Johnson, L.E., & Manakyan, H. (1995). An empirical assessment and categorization of journals relevant to DSS research. Decision Support Systems, 14 (4), 359-367.
18. Hull, R.P. & Wright, G.B. (1990). Faculty perceptions of journal quality: An update. Accounting Horizons, 4(1), 77-98.
19. Johnson, L.J. & Podsakoff, P.M. (1994). Journal influence in the field of management: An analysis using Salancik's index in a dependency network. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (5), 1392-1407.
20. Jones, A.W. (2003). Impact factors of forensic science and tox icology journals: What do the numbers really mean? Forensic Science International, 133, 1-8.
21. Katz, D.A. (1973). Faculty salaries, promotions, and productivity at a large university. American Economic Review, 63, 469-477.
22. Kirkpatrick, S.A. & Locke, E.A. (1992). The development of measures of faculty scholarship. Group and Organization Management, 17, 5-23.
23. Koenig, M.E.D. (1983). Bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 136-145.
24. Kostoff, R.N. (1998). Use and misuse of metrics in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 43 (1), 27-43.
25. Laband, D.N. & Piette, J.P. (1994). The relative impacts of economics journals: 1970-1990. Journal of Economics Literature, 32 (2), 640-666.
26. Mabry, R.H. & Sharplin, A.D. (1985). The relative importance of journals used in finance research. Journal of Financial Research, 8 (4), 287-296.
27. Marx, W., Schier, H., & Wanitschek, M. (2001). Citation analysis using online databases: Feasibilities and shortcomings. Scientometrics, 52 (1), 59-82.
28. McNulty, J.E. & Boekeloo, J. (1999). Two approaches to measuring journal quality: Application to finance journals. Journal of Economics and Finance, 23 (1), 30-38.
29. Meho, L.I. & Sonnenwald, D.H. (2000). Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance: A case study of Kurdish scholarship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (2), 123-138
30. Neuberger, J. & Counsell, C. (2002). Impact factors: Uses and abuses. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 14 (3), 209-211.
31. Oltheten, E., Travlos, N., & Theoharakis, V. (2005) Faculty perceptions and readership patterns of finance journals: A global view. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40 (1), 223-240.
32. Princeton Review. (2005). Best 237 business schools. New York: Random House/Princeton Review. [On-line] www.princetonreview.com/mba/research/rankings/ rankings.asp
33. Ratnatunga, J. & Romano, C. (1997). A "citation classics" analysis of articles in contemporary small enterprise research. Journal of business Venturing, 12, 197-212.
34. Schramm, N. (1971). Note on case studies of instructional media projects. Working paper for the academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC. In R.K. Yin (Ed.), Case study research, design and methods, 3rd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Sieber, S.D. (1973). The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1335-1359.
36. Taylor, R.L., Hunneault, G.G., & Keefe, M.J. (1991). Merit pay in academia: Historical perspective and contemporary perceptions. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 11 (3), 51-65.
37. Theoharakis, V. & Hirst, A. (2002). Perceptual differences of marketing journals: A worldwide perspective. Marketing Letters, 13 (4), 389-402.
38. Thériault, R. & St-Onge, S. (2000). Gestion de la rémunération: Théorie et pratique. Boucherville, QC: Gaetan Morin.
39. Tracy, J. & Waldfogel, J. (1997). The best business schools: A market based approach. Journal of Business, 70 (1), 1-31.
40. Vokurka, R J. (1996). The relative importance of journals used in operations management research: A citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 14, 345-355.
41. Yin, R.K. (2002). Case study research, design and methods, 3rd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
42. Zhou, D., Ma, J., & Turban, E. (2001). Journal quality assessment: An integrated subjective and objective approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48 (4), 479-490.