Using fine-grained skill models to fit student performance with bayesian networks

Handbook of Educational Data Mining

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 417-426

  Pardos, Zachary A ^a   Heffernan, Neil T ^a   Anderson, Brigham S ^b   Heffernan, Cristina L ^a  

^a Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

^b Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858972224     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/b10274     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Anderson, J. R. and Lebiere, C. (1998). The Atomic Component of Thought. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
2. Anozie, N. O. and Junker, B. W. (2006). Predicting end-of-year accountability assessment scores from monthly student records in an online tutoring system. Proceedings of the AAAI-06 Workshop on Educational Data Mining, Boston, MA. AAAI Technical Report WS-06-05, pp. 1-6.
3. Arroyo, I. and Woolf, B. (2005). Inferring learning and attitudes from a Bayesian Network of log file data. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 33-40.
4. Ayers, E. and Junker, B. W. (2006). Do skills combine additively to predict task difficulty in eighth grade mathematics? In Beck, J., Aimeur, E., and Barnes, T. (eds.), Educational Data Mining: Papers from the AAAI Workshop. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press. Technical Report WS-06-05, pp. 14-20.
5. Barnes, T. (2005). Q-matrix method: Mining student response data for knowledge. Proceedings of the AAAI-05 Workshop on Educational Data Mining, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005. AAAI Technical Report #WS-05-02.
6. Carmona, C., Millán, E., de-la Cruz, J.-L.P., Trella, M., and Conejo, R. (2005). Introducing prerequisite relations in a multi-layered Bayesian student model In Ardissono, L., Brna, P., and Mitrovic, A. (eds.), User Modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3538. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 347-356.
7. Conati, C., Gertner, A., and VanLehn, K. (2002). Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(4), 371-417.
8. Corbett, A. T., Anderson, J. R. & O’Brien, A. T. (1995). Student modeling in the ACT programming tutor In Nichols, P., Chipman, S., and Brennan, R. (eds.), Cognitively diagnostic assessment. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 19-41.
9. Feng, M., Heffernan, N. T., Mani, M., and Heffernan, C. (2006). Using mixed-effects modeling to compare different grain-sized skill models In Beck, J., Aimeur, E., and Barnes, T. (eds.), Educational Data Mining: Papers from the AAAI Workshop. AAAI Press. Technical Report WS-06-05. ISBN 978-1-57735-287-7, pp. 57-66.
10. Mathan, S. and Koedinger, K. R. (2003). Recasting the feedback debate: Benefits of tutoring error detection and correction skills In Hoppe, U., Verdejo, F., and Kay, J. (eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: Shaping the Future of Learning through Intelligent Technologies, Proceedings of AI-ED 2003. IOS Press, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 39-46.
11. McCalla, G. I. and Greer, J. E. (1994). Granularity-based reasoning and belief revision in student models In Greer, J. E. and McCalla, G. I. (eds.), Student Modelling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge-Based Instruction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp 39-62.
12. Mislevy, R.J. and Gitomer, D. H. (1996). The role of probability-based inference in an intelligent tutoring system. User-Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 5, 253-282.
13. Pardos, Z. A., Heffernan, N. T., Anderson, B., and Heffernan, C. L. (2006). Using fine-grained skill models to fit student performance with Bayesian networks. Workshop in Educational Data Mining held at the Eight International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Taiwan. http://www.educationaldatamining.org/ITS2006EDM/EDMITS2006.html
14. Pardos, Z. A., Heffernan, N. T., Anderson, B., and Heffernan, C. (2007). The effect of model granularity on student performance prediction using Bayesian networks. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on User Modeling. Springer, Corfu, Greece, pp. 435-439. http://www.educationaldatamining.org/UM2007.html
15. Pardos, Z. A., Heffernan, N. T., Ruiz, C., and Beck, J. (2008). The composition effect: Conjunctive or compensatory? An analysis of multi-skill math questions in ITS. Proceedings of the First Conference on Educational Data Mining, Montreal, Canada, pp. 147-156. http://ihelp.usask.ca/iaied/ijaied/AIED2007/AIED-EDM_proceeding_full2.pdf
16. Pardos, Z. A., Feng, M., Heffernan, N. T., and Heffernan-Lindquist, C. (2007). Analyzing finegrained skill models using Bayesian and mixed effect methods In Luckin, R. and Koedinger, K. (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. IOS Press, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 626-628.
17. Razzaq, L., Heffernan, N., Feng, M., and Pardos, Z. (2007). Developing fine-grained transfer models in the ASSISTment system. Journal of Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 5(3), 289-304.
18. Reye, J. (2004). Student modelling based on belief networks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 63-96.
19. Tatsuoka, K. K. (1990). Toward an integration of item response theory and cognitive error diagnosis In Frederiksen, N., Glaser, R., Lesgold, A., and Shafto, M. G. (eds.), Diagnostic Monitoring of Skill and Knowledge Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 453-488.
20. Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 716-730.
21. Zapata-Rivera, J.-D. and Greer, J. E. (2004). Interacting with inspectable Bayesian models. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 127-163.