Towards assessing the value of aerospace components: A conceptual scenario

ICED 11 - 18th International Conference on Engineering Design - Impacting Society Through Engineering Design

Volumn 9, Issue PART 1, 2011, Pages 226-235

  Bertoni, Marco ^a   Johansson, Christian ^a   Bertoni, Alessandro ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Decision making; Knowledge maturity; Value driven design; Value visualization

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE COMPONENTS; AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS; CAD MODELS; COMPLEX PRODUCTS; DESIGN SOLUTIONS; EARLY DESIGN STAGES; KNOWLEDGE MATURITY; SYSTEM LEVELS; TECHNOLOGICAL TOOLS; VALUE ASSESSMENT; VALUE DIMENSIONS; VALUE-DRIVEN DESIGN;

DECISION MAKING; SUPPLY CHAINS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VISUALIZATION;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 84858803312     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Webber M.M. and Rittel H. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 1973, 4, 155-169.
2. Boeing. Technology Redefines Joy of Flight. http://www.boeingcapital.com/ p2p/archive/06.2006/techredefinesjoy.htm, accessed 17th Dec. 2010.
3. AIRBUS. Setting new travel standards for all passengers, http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/a380/passenger-comfort/, accessed 17th Dec. 2010.
4. Provost M.J. The more electric aero- engine: A general overview from an engine manufacturer. In International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives, PEMD'02, April, 2002, pp.246-251. (Pubitemid 35004580)
5. CRESCENDO. D2.2.2 Benchmark of candidate approaches for value driven design, EU FP7 CRESCENDO project public deliverable, 2010, available at: www.crescendo-fp7.eu.
6. Cooper R.G. Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch (3rd ed.), 2001 (Perseus Books, Reading)
7. Stringer E.T. Action Research, 2nd Edition, 1999 (Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks).
8. Avison D., Lau F., Myers M. and Nielsen P.A. Action Research. Communications of the ACM, 1999, 42(1), 94-97. (Pubitemid 129576732)
9. Johansson C., Knowledge Maturity as Decision Support in Stage-Gate Product Development: A Case From the Aerospace Industry, 2009, PhD Dissertation Luleå University of Technology.
10. Richards M.G. Multi-attribute tradespace exploration for survivability, 2009, PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
11. Collopy P. and Hollingswort, P. Value Driven Design. In Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA'09, September 2009.
12. Ross A., Rhodes D. and Hastings D. Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2008, 11(3), 246-262.
13. Ross A., Hastings D., Warmkessel J. and Diller N. Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration as front end for effective space system design. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2004, 41(1), 20-28.
14. McManus H.M. Richards M.G, Ross A.M. and Hastings D.E. A Framework for Incorporating "ilities" in Tradespace Studies, In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2007 Space Conference and Exposition, AIAA'07, September 2007.
15. Saleh J.H., Lamassoure E.S. and Hastings D.E. Flexibility and the Value of On-Orbit Servicing: New Customer-Centric Perspective, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2003, 40(2), 279-291.
16. Wang T. and de Neufville R. Using a Coupled-Design Structure Matrix Framework to Screen for Real Options "In" an Engineering System, In INCOSE Symposium, July 2006.
17. Iacobucci D. An Empirical Examination of Some Basic Tenets of Services, In T.A. Swartz, D.E. Bowen and S.W. Brown Eds. Advances in Services Marketing and Management, 1992, pp.23-52.
18. Kauppinen M., Savolainen J., Lethola L., Komssi M., Töhönnen H. and Davies A. From Features Development to Customer Value Creation, In International Requirements Engineering Conference, August-September 2009, pp.275-280.
19. Vargo S.L. and Lusch R.F. The Four Service Marketing Myths: Remnants of a Goods-Based, Manufacturing Model, Journal of Service Research, 2004, 6, 324-335.
20. Steiner F. and Harmor, R., The Impact of Intangible Value on the Design and Marketing of New Products and Services: An Exploratory Approach, In Portland International Center for Management of engineering and Technology Conference, PICMET'09, 2009.
21. Rosenzweig P. Misunderstanding the nature of company performance: The halo effect and other business delusions. California Management Review, 2007, 49(4), pp.6-20.
22. Flanagan T., Eckert C. and Clarkson P.J. Externalizing tacit overview knowledge: A model-based approach to supporting design teams. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 2007, 21, 227-242. (Pubitemid 47229560)
23. Darlington M.J., Culley S.J., Zhao Y., Austin S.A. and Tang L.C.M. Defining a framework for the evaluation of information. International Journal of Information Quality, 2009, 2(2).
24. Stacey M. and Eckert C. Against ambiguity. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2003, 12, 153-183.
25. Gustavsson R. Design Study of Advanced Metallic Structural Integrated Fan Outlet Guide Vanes in Civil Jet Engines, 2006, Master Dissertation, Luleå University of Technology.
26. Cheung J., Scanlan J. and Wiseall S. Value Driven Design. An initial study applied to novel aerospace components in Rolls-Royce. Advanced Concurrent Engineering, 2008, Part 6, 241-248.
27. 2'11, May 2011.
28. Severin W. Another look at cue summation. AV Communication Review, 1967, 15(3), 233-245.
29. Karayanidis F. and Michie P.T. Evidence of visual processing negativity with attention to orientation and color in central space. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1997, 103(2), 282-297. (Pubitemid 27351623)
30. McNab A.L., Hess T.J. and Valacich J.S. Designing Interfaces for Faster Information Processing: Examination of the Effectiveness of Using Multiple Information Cues, In Americans Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS'09, 2009, August 2009, Paper 699.
31. 2'11, May 2011.