Value-driven design

9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Aircraft Noise and Emissions Reduction Symposium (ANERS)

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Collopy, Paul ^a   Hollingsworth, Peter ^b,c  

^a Value Driven Design Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c C 51/B Sackville Street Building   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC THEORIES; LARGE SYSTEM; VALUE-DRIVEN DESIGN;

AVIATION; ECONOMICS; EMISSION CONTROL; NOISE POLLUTION; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

DESIGN;

EID: 78249287252     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (66)

1. Achenbach, J., "NASA's Trajectory Unrealistic, Panel Says," Washington Post, 14 August 2009, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ article/2009/08/13/AR2009081302244.html retrieved on September 2, 2009.
2. Valdes-Dapena, P., "Chevy Volt to Get 230 MPG Rating," 11 August 2009 http://money.cnn.com/2009/08/11/autos/volt-mpg/ retrieved on September 2, 2009.
3. Schofield, A., "End of Year Is New Goal for 787 First Flight," Aviation Week, 27 August 2009. http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story- channel.jsp?channel=comm&id=news/BOEFIRST082709.xml&headline= End%20Of%20Year%20Is%20New%20Goal%20For%20787%20First%20Flight retrieved on September 2, 2009.
4. -, "Airbus A380," Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Airbus-A380 retrieved on September 2, 2009.
5. Schwenn, R. E., Brink, H., Mebane, C. T., Seales, S. C., and Wintfeld, J. R., Defense Acquisitions: Assessment of Selected Weapon Programs, Report GAO-09-326SP, United States Government Accountability Office, March 2009. Cited figures were drawn from the table on the Highlights page at the front of the report. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09326sp.pdf retrieved on September 2, 2009.
6. Augustine, N. R., Augustine's Laws, 6th edition, Reston, Virginia, retrieved on September 2, 2009. See page 105 for cost growth and page 153 for schedule growth.
7. -, "Ares I," Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ares-I retrieved on September 2, 2009.
8. Eveker, K. The Budgetary Implications of NASA's Current Plans for Space Exploration. See page 7. Congressional Budget Office, Washington DC, April 2009. http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=5772 retrieved on September 2, 2009.
9. Collopy, P. D., "Adverse Impact of Extensive Attribute Requirements on the Design of Complex Systems," AIAA Paper 2007-7820, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2007
10. Hazelrigg, G. A., "A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design," pp. 653-658 in the ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 120, No. 4, December, 1998. See page 656 in particular.
11. DeBreu, G., "Theory of Value; an Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium," Wiley, NY, 1959.
12. von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O., (1947), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 16-31.
13. Collopy, P. D., "Aerospace System Value Models: A Survey and Observations," AIAA Paper 2009-6560, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2009.
14. Simon, H. A., "The Science of Design: Creating the Artificial," pp. 128-159 in Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd edition, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1981. Simon identifies optimization as the correct framework for representing the process of design on pages 134-135.
15. Sage, A. P., Methodology for Large Scale Systems, McGraw-Hill, NY, 1977. The value system design quote is taken from page 69. Worth analysis is discussed on pages 353 ff.
16. Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, NY, 1976.
17. - "Multidisciplinary Design Optimization," Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multidisciplinary-design-optimization, retrieved September 4, 2009.
18. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., James, B., and Riley, M., "Structural Optimization by Generalized, Multilevel Decomposition," AIAA Journal, Vol. 25, No. 1, January 1987, pp. 139-145.
19. Cramer, E. J., Dennis, J. E., Frank, P. D., Lewis, R. M., and Shubin, G. R., "Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization," SIAM Journal of Optimization, Vol. 4, No. 4, November, 1994, pp. 754-776.
20. Hazelrigg, G. A., Systems Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1996.
21. Collopy, P. D., "A System for Values, Leadership and Communications in Product Design," International Powered Lift Conference Proceedings, P-306, SAE Publications, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1997, pp. 95 - 98.
22. Collopy, P. D., "Economic-Based Distributed Optimal Design," AIAA Paper 2001-4675, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2001.
23. Collopy, P. D., "Value of the Probability of Success," AIAA Paper 2008-7876, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2008.
24. Biffl, S., Aurum, A., Boehm, B., Erdogmus, H., and Grünbacher, P., editors, Value-Based Software Engineering, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 2006.
25. Kirby, M. R., A Methodology for Technology Identification, Evaluation, and Selection in Conceptual and Preliminary Aircraft Design, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta GA, 2001.
26. Baker, A. P., The Role of Mission Requirements, Vehicle Attributed, Technologies and Uncertainty in Rotorcraft System Design, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA March 2002.
27. Hollingsworth, P. M., Requirements Controlled Design: A Method for Discovery of Discontinuous System Boundaries in the Requirements Hyperspace, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, March 2004.
28. Biltgen, P. T., A Methodology for Capability-Based Technology Evaluation for Systems-of-Systems, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, March, 2007.
29. Ender, T. R., A Top-Down, Hierarchical, System-of-Systems Approach to the Design of an Air Defense Weapon, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2006.
30. Pfaender, J H, Competetive Assessment of Aerospace Systems Using System Dynamics, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 2006.
31. Fernandez, M. I., Valuation of Design Adaptability in Aerospace Systems, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2008.
32. Briceno, S. I., A Game-Based Decision Support Methodology for Competitive Systems Design, PhD Thesis, Georgia Insitute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2008.
33. Joppin, C., and Hastings, D., "Evaluation of the Value of the Flexibility Offered by On-orbit Servicing: Case of Satellite Upgrade," AIAA Paper 2003-6366, Reston, Virginia, 2003.
34. Long, A. M., Richards, M. G., and Hastings, D. E., "On-Orbit Servicing: A New Value Proposition for Satellite Design and Operation," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 44, No. 4, July-August 2007, 964-976.
35. Olivier L. de Weck, O. L., de Neufville, R., and Chaize, M., "Enhancing the Economics of Communications Satellites via Orbital Reconfigurations and Staged Deployment," AIAA Paper 2003-6317, Reston, Virginia, 2003.
36. Saleh, J. H., et. al., "Flexibility and the Value of On-Orbit Servicing: New Customer-Centric Perspective," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 40, No. 2, March-April 2003, pp. 279-291.
37. Ross, A. M., and Hastings, D. E. "Assessing Changeability in Aerospace Systems Architecting and Design Using Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration," AIAA Paper 2006-7255, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2006.
38. Ross, A. M., McManus, H. L., Long, A., Richards, M. G., Rhodes, D. H., and Hastings, D. E. "Responsive Systems Comparison Method: Case Study in Assessing Future Designs in the Presence of Change," AIAA Paper 2008-7732, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2008.
39. Ross, A. M., and Rhodes, D. H., "Using Natural Value-Centric Time Scales for Conceptualizing System Timelines through Epoch-Era Analysis," 18th Annual International Symposium of INCOSE, 15-19 June 2008.
40. Saleh, J. H., and Marais, K., "Reliability: How Much Is It Worth? Beyond Its Estimation or Prediction, the (Net) Present Value of Reliability," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 91, No. 6, June 2006, pp. 665-673.
41. Marais, K. B., and Saleh, J H, "Beyond Its Cost, the Value of Maintenance: An Analytical Framework for Capturing its Net Present Value," Reliability Engineering & Safety, vol. 94, no. 2, February 2006, pp. 644-657.
42. Dubos, G. F., Saleh, J. H., "Identifying and Quantifying the Value of Responsiveness in the Presence of Uncertainty," AIAA Paper 2009-6803, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2009.
43. Saleh, J. H., "Flawed Metrics: Satellite Cost per Transponder and Cost per Day," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 44, No. 1, January, 2008, pages 147-156.
44. Brown, O., and Eremenko, P., "The Value Proposition for Fractionated Space Architectures," AIAA Paper 2006-7506, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2006.
45. Brown, O., and Eremenko, P., "Application of Value-Centric Design to Space Architectures: The Case of Fractionated Spacecraft," AIAA Paper 2008-7869, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2008.
46. Brown, O. C., Eremenko, P., and Collopy, P. D., "Value-Centric Design Methodologies for Fractionated Spacecraft: Progress Summary from Phase 1 of the DARPA System F6 Program," AIAA Paper 2009-6540, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2009.
47. McCormick, D., Barrett, B., and Burnside-Clapp, M., "Analyzing Fractionated Satellite Architectures Using RAFTIMATE - A Boeing Tool for Value-Centric Design," AIAA Paper 2009-6767, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2009
48. Maciuca, D., et al., "A Modular, High-Fidelity Tool to Model the Utility of Fractionated Space Systems," AIAA Paper 2009-6765, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2009.
49. Eichenberg-Bicknell, E., Wisniewski, M. J., Choi, S. W., and Westley, D. M., "Using a Value-centric Tool Framework to Optimize Lifecycle Cost, Value, and Risk of Spacecraft Architectures," AIAA Paper 2009-6766, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2009.
50. Collopy, P. D., "Value-Driven Design and the Global Positioning System," AIAA Paper 2006-7213, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2006.
51. Li, Y, Hollingsworth, P, and Mavris, D. "A Concept Selection Methods Developed from a Probabilistic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Technique Using Utility Theory," SAE 2005 Transactions Journal of Aerospace, vol 114, sec 1 2006, pp. 1486-1495.
52. Biltgen, P T, Ender, T, and Mavris D N, "Development of a Collaborative Capability-Based Tradeoff Environment for Complex Systems Architectures," in 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 9-12, 2006.
53. Marsaw, A., German, B., Hollingsworth, P., and Mavris D., "An Interactive Visualization Environment for Decision Making in Aircraft Engine Preliminary Design," in 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 8-11, 2007.
54. Ashby, M. F., Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, 3rd ed., Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 2005.
55. Briceno, S. and Mavris, D., "Strategic Decision-Making: Applications of Game Theory in a Systems Approach to Commercial Engine Selection," in AIAA 5th ATIO and 16th Lighter-than-Air Systems Technology and Balloon Systems Conferences, Arlington, VA, September 26-28, 2005.
56. Briceno, S. I., and Mavris, D. N., "Applications of Game Theory in a Systems Design Approach to Strategic Engine Selection," in 25th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Hamburg Germany, September 2006.
57. Forrester, J. W., Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1961.
58. Sterman, J. D., Business Dynamics, Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2000.
59. Hollingsworth, P., Pfaender, H., and Mavris, D., "Program and Design Decisions in an Uncertain and Dynamic Market: Making Engineering Choices Matter," SAE 2005 Transactions: Journal of Aerospace, vol 114, no. 1, 2006, pp. 1486-1495.
60. Keeney, R. L., Value-Focused Thinking, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
61. Lave, C. A., and March, J. G., An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences, Harper & Row, New York, 1975. See Chapter 3, "The Evaluation of Speculations.
62. Hollingsworth, P and Mavris D, "Identification of the Requirements Space Topology for a Rapid Response Strike System.", SAE Transactions: Journal of Aerospace, vol. 110, no. 1, 2002, pp. 663-673.
63. Mavris, D N, Baker, A P, and Schrage, D P, "Simultaneous Assessment of Requirements and Technologies in Rotorcraft Design," in Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Virginia Beach, VA, May 2-4, 2000.
64. Saleh, J. H., Hastings D. E., and Newman D. J., " Flexibility in System Design and Implications for Aerospace Systems, Acta Astronautica, vol. 53 no. 12, December 2003, pp. 927-944.
65. Collopy, P. D., "Balancing Risk and Value in System Development," AIAA Paper 2003-6376, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2003.
66. Carter, A. B., and White, J. P., Keeping the Edge: Managing Defense for the Future, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2001, pp. 194-202.