Diffusive transfer between two intensely interacting cells with limited surface kinetics

Chemical Engineering Science

Volumn 74, Issue , 2012, Pages 114-123

  Labowsky, M ^a   Fahmy, T M ^b  

^a Ansama Research   (United States)

^b Yale University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomedical engineering; Cellular biology and engineering; Diffusive interactions; Mass transfer; Mathematical modeling; Paracrine delivery

Indexed keywords

BYSTANDER SIGNALING; CELLULAR BIOLOGY; CELLULAR PROCESS; CELLULAR TARGETS; CHEMICAL FACTORS; CONCENTRATION FIELDS; CYTOKINES; DIFFUSIVE TRANSFER; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INFORMATION EXCHANGES; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; PARACRINE; STEADY STATE DIFFUSION; SURFACE KINETICS; TRANSFER EFFICIENCY; TRANSFER RATES;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; MASS TRANSFER; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

CELL ENGINEERING;

EID: 84858744324     PISSN: 00092509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2012.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Almeria B, Fahmy TM, Gomez A A multiplexed electrospray process for single-step synthesis of stabilized polymeric drug delivery particulates. J. Control. Release 2011, 154:203-210.
2. Annamalai K., Ryan W. Interactive processes in gasification and combustion. Part 1: Liquid drop arrays and clouds. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1992, 18:221-295.
3. Dustin M.L. The immunological synapse. Arthritis Res. 2002, 4(Suppl. 3):S119-S125.
4. Dustin M.L. Impact of the immunological synapse on T cell signaling. Results Probl. Cell Differ. 2006, 43:175-198.
5. Grakoui A., Bromley S.K., Sumen C., Davis M.M., Shaw A.S., Allen P.M., Dustin M.L. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 1999, 285:221-227.
6. Greiff A.H., Fischer W.M., Sehgal I. Paracrine communication between malignant and non-malignant prostate epithelial cells in culture alters growth rate, matrix protease secretion and in vitro invasion. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2002, 19:727-733.
7. Huse M., Lillemeier B.F., Kuhns M.S., Chen D.S., Davis M.M. T cells use two directionally distinct pathways for cytokine secretion. Nat. Immunol. 2006, 7:247-255.
8. Huse M., Quann E.J., Davis M.M. Shouts, whispers and the kiss of death: directional secretion in T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9:1105-1111.
9. Jankowski V., Karadogan S., Vanholder R., Nofer J.R., Herget-Rosenthal S., van der Giet M., Tolle M., Tran T.N., Zidek W., Jankowski J. Paracrine stimulation of vascular smooth muscle proliferation by diadenosine polyphosphates released from proximal tubule epithelial cells. Kidney Int. 2007, 71:994-1000.
10. Kress H, Park J, Mejean C, Forster J, Park J, Walse S, Zhang Y, Wu D, Weiner D, Fahmy TM, Dufresne E. Cellular stimulation with optically manipulated microsources. Nat. Methods 2009, 6(12):905-909.
11. Labowsky M. Effects of nearest neighbor interactions on evaporation rate of cloud particles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1976, 31:803-813.
12. Labowsky M. Formalism for calculating evaporation rates of rapidly evaporating interacting particles. Combust. Sci. Technol. 1978, 18:145-151.
13. Labowsky M. Calculation of the burning rates of interacting fuel droplets. Combust. Sci. Technol. 1980, 22:217-226.
14. Labowsky M. Transfer rate calculations for compositionally dissimilar interacting particles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1980, 35:1041-1048.
15. Labowsky M. A model for solvated ion emission from electrospray droplets. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 24:3079-3091.
16. Labowsky M., Fenn J.B., de la Mora J.F. A continuum model for ion evaporation from a drop: effect of curvature and charge on ion solvation energy. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 406:105-118.
17. Li W., Li P., Hua Q., Hou J., Wang J., Du H., Tang H., Xu Y. The impact of paracrine signaling in brain microvascular endothelial cells on the survival of neurons. Brain Res. 2009, 1287:28-38.
18. Lieblein J.C., Ball S., Hutzen B., Sasser A.K., Lin H.J., Huang T.H., Hall B.M., Lin J. STAT3 can be activated through paracrine signaling in breast epithelial cells. BMC Cancer 2008, 8:302.
19. Malek T.R. The biology of interleukin-2. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 26:453-479.
20. Monks C.R., Freiberg B.A., Kupfer H., Sciaky N., Kupfer A. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 1998, 395:82-86.
21. Pardoll D.M. Spinning molecular immunology into successful immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 2:227-238.
22. Raman C, Berland C, Kim K, Pack D Modeling small molecule release from PLG microspheres: effects of polymer degradation and nonuniform drug distribution. J. Control. Release 2005, 103:149-158.
23. Robinson M., Buj-Bello A., Davies A.M. Paracrine interactions of BDNF involving NGF-dependent embryonic sensory neurons. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 1996, 7:143-151.
24. Sabatos C.A., Doh J., Chakravarti S., Friedman R.S., Pandurangi P.G., Tooley A.J., Krummel M.F. A synaptic basis for paracrine interleukin-2 signaling during homotypic T cell interaction. Immunity 2008, 29:238-248.
25. Sangiovanni JJ, Labowsky M Burning times of linear fuel droplet arrays:a comparison of experiment and theory. Combust. Flame 1982, 47:15-30.
26. Sharpe A.H., Abbas A.K. T-cell costimulation-biology, therapeutic potential, and challenges. New Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355:973-975.
27. Sirignano W.A. Fluid Dynamics and Transport of Droplets and Sprays 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
28. Smith-Garvin J.E., Koretzky G.A., Jordan M.S. T cell activation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 27:591-619.
29. Steenblock E, Fahmy TM A comprehensive platform for T cell stimulation based on biodegradable artificial antigen-presenting cell microparticles. Mol. Ther. 2008, 16::765-772.
30. Steenblock ER, Fadel T, Labowsky M, Pober JS, Fahmy TM An artificial antigen-presenting cell with paracrine delivery of IL-2 impacts the magnitude and direction of the T cell response. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:34883-34892.
31. Takeda M., Takahashi M., Matsumoto S. Contribution of activated interleukin receptors in trigeminal ganglion neurons to hyperalgesia via satellite glial interleukin-1beta paracrine mechanism. Brain Behav Immun. 2008, 22:1016-1023.