Reporting standards for studies of tailored interventions

Health Education Research

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 331-342

  Harrington, Nancy Grant ^a   Noar, Seth M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCUMENTATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PUBLICATION; STANDARD;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PUBLICATIONS;

EID: 84858691370     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyr108     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ, Glassman B. One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials. Ann Behav Med 1999; 21: 276-283. (Pubitemid 30149369)
2. Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K et al. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res 2008; 23: 454-66. (Pubitemid 351786621)
3. Kreuter MW, Skinner CS. Tailoring: what's in a name? Health Educ Res 2000; 15: 1-4. (Pubitemid 30088046)
4. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Velicer WF et al. Standardized, individualized, interactive, and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation. Health Psychol 1993; 12: 399-405.
5. Campbell MK, DeVellis BM, Strecher VJ et al. Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 783-87. (Pubitemid 24237357)
6. Brug J, Steenhuis I, van Assema P et al. The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med 1996; 25: 236-42. (Pubitemid 26177565)
7. Curry SJ, Wagner EH, Grothaus LC. Evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation interventions with a self-help smoking cessation program. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59: 318-24.
8. Dijkstra A, De Vries H, Roijackers J et al. Tailoring information to enhance quitting in smokers with low motivation to quit: three basic efficacy questions. Health Psychol 1998; 17: 513-19. (Pubitemid 28541533)
9. Noar SM, Harrington NG, Aldrich RS. The role of message tailoring in the development of persuasive health communication messages. Commun Yearbook 2009; 33: 72-133.
10. Brug J, Campbell M, van Assema P. The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 145-56. (Pubitemid 29078654)
11. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 2010; 51: 214-21.
12. Kroeze W, Werkman A, Brug J. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med 2006; 31: 205-23. (Pubitemid 43825346)
13. Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK et al. How effective is tailored print communication? Ann Behav Med 1999; 21: 290-98. (Pubitemid 30149371)
14. Strecher VJ. Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: A review and discussion. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 107-17. (Pubitemid 29078651)
15. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 673-93.
16. Noar SM, Harrington NG, Van Stee SK et al. Tailored health communication to change lifestyle behaviors. Am J Lifestyle Med 2011; 5: 112-22.
17. Altman DG. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. BMJ 1996; 313: 570-71. (Pubitemid 26293636)
18. Siegel JE, Weinstein MC. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. JAMA 1996; 276: 1339.
19. Howley L, Szauter K, Perkowski L et al. Quality of standardised patient research reports in the medical education literature: review and recommendations. Med Educ 2008; 42: 350-58. (Pubitemid 351388736)
20. Colt J, Lamoureux J, Patterson R et al. Reporting standards for biofilter performance studies. Aquac Eng 2006; 34: 377-88.
21. Nature Publishing Group. Standard operating procedures. Nat Biotechnol 2006; 24: 1299.
22. Sohl SJ, Moyer A. Tailored interventions to promote mam-mography screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med 2007; 45: 252-61. (Pubitemid 47562532)
23. Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M. Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77: 1028S-34S.
24. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav 2003; 27: S227-32. (Pubitemid 38011135)
25. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 1999; 354: 1896-900.
26. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.
27. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-12. (Pubitemid 30214957)
28. Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 167-71.
29. Consort. Available at: http://www.consort-statement.org. Accessed: 23 September 2009.
30. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N. Improving the reported quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 361-66. (Pubitemid 38269486)
31. American Educational Research Association. Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AREA publications. Educ Res 2006; 35: 33-40.
32. APA Publications and Communications Board. Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. Reporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? what might they be? Am Psychol 2008; 63: 839-51.
33. Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C. Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2001; 285: 1996.
34. Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA 2001; 285: 1992.
35. Medical Research Council. Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. BMJ 1948; 2: 769-82.
36. Smith ML, Glass GV. Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. Am Psychol 1977; 32: 752-60.
37. Harrington NG, Noar SM. Reporting Standards for Studies of Tailored Interventions: A Communication Challenge. Paper Presented at the 2010 Convention of the International Communication Association, Singapore, 2010.
38. Haerens L, Deforche B, Maes L et al. A computer-tailored dietary fat intake intervention for adolescents: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med 2007; 34: 253-62. (Pubitemid 350276268)
39. Kreuter MW, Sugg-Skinner C, Holt CL et al. Cultural tailoring for mammography and fruit and vegetable intake among low-income African-American women in urban public health centers. Prev Med 2005; 41: 53-62. (Pubitemid 40755063)
40. Noar SM, Zimmerman RS. Health behavior theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: are we moving in the right direction? Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 275-90. (Pubitemid 40732812)
41. Marcus BH, Napolitano MA, King AC et al. Telephone versus print delivery of an individualized motivationally tailored physical activity intervention: Project STRIDE. Health Psychol 2007; 26: 401-9. (Pubitemid 47444997)
42. Champion V, Skinner CS, Hui S et al. The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 65: 416-23. (Pubitemid 46241783)
43. Donohew L, Palmgreen P, Duncan J. An activation model of information exposure. Commun Monogr 1980; 47: 295.
44. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
45. Kroeze W, Oenema A, Campbell M et al. The efficacy of web-based and print-delivered computer-tailored interventions to reduce fat intake: results of a randomized, controlled trial. J Nutr Educ Behav 2008; 40: 226-36. (Pubitemid 351815193)
46. Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychol 1988; 7: 355-86.
47. Ten Wolde GB, Dijkstra A, van Empelen P et al. Long-term effectiveness of computer-generated tailored patient education on benzodiazepines: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction 2008; 103: 662-70. (Pubitemid 351389283)
48. Dijkstra A. The psychology of tailoring-ingredients in computer-tailored persuasion. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2008; 2: 765-84.
49. Evers KE, Prochaska JO, Van Marter DF et al. Transtheor-etical-based bullying prevention effectiveness trials in middle schools and high schools. Educ Res 2007; 49: 397-414.
50. Marcus AC, Mason M, Wolfe P et al. The efficacy of tailored print materials in promoting colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial involving callers to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service. J Health Commun 2005; 10: 83-104. (Pubitemid 43041760)
51. Webb MS, Simmons VN, Brandon TH. Tailored interventions for motivating smoking cessation: using placebo tailoring to examine the influence of expectancies and personalization. Health Psychol 2005; 24: 179-88. (Pubitemid 40365680)
52. Webb MS, Hendricks PS, Brandon TH. Expectancy priming of smoking cessation messages enhances the placebo effect of tailored interventions. Health Psychol 2007; 26: 598-609. (Pubitemid 47488596)
53. Neumann T, Neuner B, Weiss-Gerlach E et al. The effect of computerized tailored brief advice on at-risk drinking in subcritically injured trauma patients. J Trauma 2006; 61: 805-14. (Pubitemid 44569409)
54. Lipkus IM, Lyna PR, Rimer BK. Using tailored interventions to enhance smoking cessation among African-Americans at a community health center. Nicotine Tob Res 1999; 1: 77-85.
55. Kiene SM, Barta WD. A brief individualized computer-delivered sexual risk reduction intervention increases HIV/AIDS preventive behavior. J Adolesc Health 2006; 39: 404-10. (Pubitemid 44224128)
56. Heimendinger J, O'Neill C, Marcus AC et al. Multiple tailored messages are effective in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among callers to the cancer information service. J Health Commun 2005; 10(Suppl. 1): 65-82. (Pubitemid 43041759)
57. Noar SM, Webb E, Van Stee S et al. Using computer technology for HIV prevention among African Americans: development of a tailored information program for safer sex (TIPSS). Health Educ Res 2011; 26: 393-406.
58. Noar SM, Crosby R, Benac C et al. Application of the attitude-social influence-efficacy model to condom use among African-American STD clinic patients: implications for tailored health communication. AIDS Behav 2011; 15: 1045-1057.
59. Noar SM, Harrington NG (eds). eHealth Appliciations: Promising Strategies for Behavior Change. New York, NY: Routledge, in press.