How effective is tailored print communication?

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 290-298

  Skinner, Celette Sugg ^a   Campbell, Marci K ^b   Rimer, Barbara K ^b   Curry, Susan ^b   Prochaska, James O ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MASS MEDIUM; PUBLICATION;

EID: 0033502371     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02895960     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Rakowski W: The potential variances of tailoring in health behavior interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999. 21(4):284-289.
2. Kreuter MK, Strecher VJ, Glassman B: One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999, 21(4):276-283.
3. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ: Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: Results from a randomized trial. Health Psychology. 1995, 14(1):56-63.
4. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ: Do tailored behavior change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisal? Results from a randomized trial. Health Education Research. 1996, 11(1):97-105.
5. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CD, Velicer WF, Rossi JS: Standardized, individualized, interactive, and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation. Health Psychology. 1993, 12(5):399-405.
6. Campbell MK, DeVellis BM, Strecher VJ, et al: Improving dietary behavior: The effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. American Journal of Public Health. 1994, 84(5):783-787.
7. Skinner CS, Strecher VJ, Hospers H: Physicians' recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference? American Journal of Public Health. 1994, 84(1):43-49.
8. Rimer BK, Glassman B: Tailoring communications for primary care settings. Methods of Information in Medicine. 1998, 37:1610-1611.
9. Marcus BH, Emmons KM, Simkin-Silverman L, et al: Evaluation of motivationally tailored vs. standard self-help physical activity interventions at the workplace. American Journal of Health Promotion. 1998, 12(2):246-253.
10. Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Goldstein M, et al: Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. Preventive Medicine. 1998, 27:748-756.
11. Drossaert CH, Boer H, Seydel ER: Health education to improve repeat participation in the Dutch breast cancer screening program: Evaluation of a leaflet tailored to previous participants. Patient Education and Counseling. 1996, 28(2):121-131.
12. Brinberg D, Axelson ML: Increasing the consumption of dietary fiber: A decision theory analysis. Health Education Research. 1990, 5(4):409-420.
13. Jaccard J, Wood G: An idiothetic analysis of behavioral decision making. In Brinberg D, Lutz RJ (eds), Perspectives on Methodology in Consumer Research. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986, 67-106.
14. Meldrum P, Turnbull D, Dobson HM, et al: Tailored written invitations for second round breast cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Screening. 1994, 1:245-248.
15. Strecher VJ, Rosenstock IM: The Health Belief Model. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer EK (eds), Health Behavior and Health Education (2nd Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997, 41-59.
16. Rakowski W, Dube CE, Marcus BH, et al: Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography. Health Psychology. 1992, 11(2):111-118.
17. Rakowski W, Fulton JP, Feldman JP: Women's decision-making about mammography: A replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychology. 1993, 12(3):209-214.
18. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Rossi JS, et al: Stages of change and decisional balance for twelve problem behaviors. Health Psychology. 1994, 13:39-46.
19. Strecher VJ, Kreuter M, DenBoer DJ, et al: The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings. Journal of Family Practice. 1994, 39(3):262-270.
20. Weiner B: An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
21. Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van Assema P, De Vries H: The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Preventive Medicine. 1996, 25:236-242.
22. Ajzen I, Fishbein M: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1980.
23. Bandura A: Self-efficacy mechanism in physiological activation and health-promoting behavior. In Madden J, Matthysse S, Barchas J (eds), Adaptation, Learning, and Affect. New York: Raven Press, 1986.
24. Brug J, Glanz K, Van Assema P, Kok G, Van Breukelen GJ: The impact of computer-tailored feedback and iterative feedback on fat, fruit, and vegetable intake. Health Education and Behavior. 1998, 25:357-371.
25. Curry SJ, Wagner EH, Grothaus LC: Evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation interventions with a self-help smoking cessation program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1991, 59:318-324.
26. Curry SJ, Wagner EH, Grothaus LC: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for smoking cessation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1990, 58:310-316.
27. Curry SJ, McBride C, Grothaus LC, Louie D, Wagner EH: A randomized trial of self-help materials, personalized feedback, and telephone counseling with nonvolunteer smokers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1995, 63(6):175-180.
28. Abrams DB, Mills S, Bulger D: Challenges and future directions for tailored communication research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999, 21(4):299-306.
29. Kreuter MW, Scharff DP, Brennan L, Lukwago SN, Olevitch LR: Toward more effective health communication: Comparing effects of tailored, personalized, and untailored messages in a randomized trial. Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association. Indianapolis, IN: November 11-13, 1997.
30. Rimer BK, Conaway M, Lyna P, et al: The impact of tailored interventions on a community health center population. Patient Education and Counseling. 1999, 337(2):125-140.
31. Lipkus I, Lyna P, Rimer BK: Using tailored interventions to enhance smoking cessation among African-American smokers at a community health center. Nicotine and Tobacco Research (in press, 1999).
32. Petty R, Cacioppi JT: The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1986, 19:123-205.
33. Campbell MK, Waldmiller M, Bernhardt J, et al: Varying the message source in computer-tailored nutrition education. Patient Education and Counseling. 1999, 36(2):157-169.