Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials

JAMA

Volumn 285, Issue 15, 2001, Pages 1996-1999

  Egger, Matthias ^a,b   Jüni, Peter ^a,b   Bartlett, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STANDARD;

EID: 0035906301     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.15.1996     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement
2. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: The CONSORT statement
3. A standard method for reporting randomized medical scientific research: The "consolidation of the standards of reporting trials" (CONSORT)
4. CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement: Consolidation of Standards for Reporting Trials
5. CONSORT: An attempt to improve the quality of publication of clinical trials
6. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
7. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: A comparative before-and-after evaluation
8. Inadequate reporting of controlled trials as short reports
9. Beyond CONSORT: Need for improved reporting standards for clinical trials
10. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials
11. Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
12. CONSORT: An evolving tool to help improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials
13. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials