A computer-tailored dietary fat intake intervention for adolescents: Results of a randomized controlled trial

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 253-262

  Haerens, Leen ^a   Deforche, Benedicte ^a   Maes, Lea ^a   Brug, Johannes ^b   Vandelanotte, Corneel ^c   De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FAT INTAKE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOSOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SCHOOL CHILD;

ADOLESCENT; DIETARY FATS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OBESITY; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 37249026718     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02874550     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Hooper L, Summerbell CD, Higgins JP, et al.: Dietary fat intake and prevention of cardiovascular disease: Systematic review. British Medical Journal. 2001, 322:757-763.
2. World Health Organization: Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2003.
3. Staessen L, De Bacquer D, De Henauw S, De Backer G, Van Peteghem C: Relation between fat intake and mortality: An ecological analysis in Belgium. European Journal of Cancer Prevention. 1997, 6:374-381.
4. Astrup A: The role of dietary fat in Obesity. Seminars in vascular medicine. 2005, 5:40-47.
5. National Council on Nutrition: Dietary Recommendations for Belgium. Brussels, Belgium: Ministry of Social Affairs, Public Health and Environment, 2003.
6. Lytle LA, Kubik MY: Nutritional issues for adolescents. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2003, 17:177-189.
7. Cruz JAA: Dietary habits and nutritional status in adolescents over Europe - Southern Europe. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2000, 54:S29-S35.
8. Matthys C, de Henauw S, Devos C, de Backer G: Estimated energy intake, macronutrient intake and meal pattern of Flemish adolescents. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003, 57:366-375
9. Kelder SH, Perry CL, Klepp KI, Lytle LL: Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical-activity, and food choice behaviors. American Journal of Public Health. 1994, 84:1121-1126.
10. Lien N, Lytle LA, Klepp KI: Stability in consumption of fruit, vegetables, and sugary foods in a cohort from age 14 to age 21. Preventive Medicine. 2001, 33:217-226.
11. Wechsler H, Devereaux RS, Davis M, Collins J: Using the school environment to promote physical activity and healthy eating. Preventive Medicine. 2000, 31:S121-S137.
12. Lytle LA, Murray DM, Perry CL, et al.: School-based approaches to affect adolescents' diets: Results from the TEENS study. Health Education & Behavior. 2004, 31:270-287.
13. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Conway TL, et al.: Environmental interventions for eating and physical activity: A randomized controlled trial in middle schools. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003, 24:209-217.
14. Gortmaker SL, Peterson K, Wiecha J, et al.: Reducing obesity via a school-based interdisciplinary intervention among youth: Planet health. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 1999, 153:409-418.
15. De Vries H, Brug J: Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: Introduction to a new approach. Patient Education and Counseling. 1999, 36:99-105.
16. Kreuter MW, Skinner CS: Tailoring: What's in a name? Health Education Research. 2000, 15:1-4.
17. Skinner CS, Campbell M, Rimer B, Curry S, Prochaska J: How effective is tailored print communication? Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999, 21:290-298.
18. Brug J, Steenhuis I, vanAssema P, deVries H: The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Preventive Medicine. 1996, 25:236-242.
19. Brug J, Campbell M, van Assema P: The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: A review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling. 1999, 36:145-156.
20. Kroeze W, Werkman A, Brug J: A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2006, 31:205-223.
21. Oenema A, Tan F, Brug J: Short-term efficacy of a webbased computer-tailored nutrition intervention: Main effects and mediators. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2005, 29:54-63.
22. De Bourdeaudhuij I, Stevens V, Vandelanotte C, Brug J: Evaluation of an interactive computer-tailored nutrition intervention in a real-life setting. Annals of Behavioral Medicine (in press, 2007).
23. Vandelanotte C, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sallis JF, et al.: Efficacy of sequential or simultaneous interactive computer-tailored interventions for increasing physical activity and decreasing dietary fat intake. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2005, 29:138-146.
24. De Bourdeaudhuij I, Van Oost P: Personal and family determinants of dietary behaviour in adolescents and their parents. Psychology and Health. 2000, 15:751-770.
25. Brug J, Vanassema P, Kok G, et al: Self-Rated Dietary-Dietary fat intake: Association with objective assessment of fat, psychosocial factors, and intention to change. Journal of Nutrition Education. 1994, 26:218-223.
26. Lechner L, Brug J, De Vries H, et al.: Stages of change for fruit, vegetable and dietary fat intake: Consequences of misconception. Health Education Research. 1998, 13:1-11.
27. De Bourdeaudhuij I, Brug J: Tailoring dietary feedback to reduce dietary fat intake: An intervention at the family level. Health Education Research. 2000, 15:449-462.
28. De Bourdeaudhuij I, Brug J, Vandelanotte C, Van Oost P: Differences in impact between a family- versus an individual-based tailored intervention to reduce dietary fat intake. Health Education Research. 2002, 17:435-449.
29. Frenn M, Malin S, Brown RL, et al.: Changing the tide: An Internet/video exercise and low-fat diet intervention with middle-school students. Applied Nursing Research. 2005, 18:13-21.
30. Oenema A, Brug J: Feedback strategies to raise awareness of personal dietary intake: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Preventive Medicine. 2003, 36:429-439.
31. Brug J, Steenhuis I, van Assema P, et al.: Computer-tailored nutrition education: Differences between two interventions. Health Education Research. 1999, 14:249-256.
32. Vandelanotte C, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Brug J: Acceptability and feasibility of an interactive computer-tailored dietary fat intake intervention in Belgium. Health Promotion International. 2004, 19:463-470.
33. Haerens L, Deforche B, Maes L, et al.: Evaluation of a 2-year physical activity and healthy eating intervention in middle school children. Health Education Research. 2006, 21:911-921.
34. Haerens L, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Maes L, et al.: The effects of a middle-school healthy eating intervention on adolescents' fat and fruit intake and soft drinks consumption. Public Health Nutrition. 2007, 10:443-449.
35. Van Damme J, De Troy A, Meyer J, et al.: Succesvol Doorstromen in de Aanvangsjaren van het Secundair Onderwijs. [Successful Flowthrough in the Inceptions Years of the Middle School Education]. Leuven, Belgium: Acco, 1997.
36. Vandelanotte C, Matthys C, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Reliability and validity of a computerized questionnaire to measure dietary fat intake in Belgium. Nutrition Research. 2004, 24:621-631.
37. Hagler AS, Norman GJ, Radick LR, et al.: Comparability and reliability of paper- and computer-based measures of psychosocial constructs for adolescent fruit and vegetable and dietary fat intake. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2005, 105:1758-1764.
38. Sallis J, Pinski R, Grossman RM, et al.: The development of self-efficacy scales for health-related diet and exercise behaviors. Health Education Research. 1988, 3:283-292.
39. Rossi S, Greene G, Rossi J, et al.: Validation of decisional balance and situational temptations measures for dietary fat reduction in a large school-based population of adolescents. Eating Behavior. 2001, 2:1-18.
40. Prochaska JO, Diclemente CC, Norcross JC: In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist. 1992, 47:1102-1114.
41. Brug J, Hospers HJ, Kok G: Differences in psychosocial factors and fat consumption between stages of change for fat reduction. Psychology and Health. 1997, 12:719-727.
42. Povey R, Connor M, Sparks P, James R, Shepherd R: A critical examination of the application of the transtheoretical model's stages of change to dietary behaviours. Health Education Research. 1999, 14:641-651.
43. Resnicow K, McCarty F, Baranowski T: Are precontemplators less likely to change their dietary behaviour? A prospective analysis. Health Education Research. 2003, 18:693-705.
44. De Nooijer J, Van Assema P, De Vet E, Brug J: How stable are stages of change for nutrition behaviors in the Netherlands? Health Promotion International. 2005, 20:27-32.
45. Bandura A: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
46. Ajzen I: From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 1985.
47. De Vries H, Backbier E, Kok G, Dijkstra M: The impact of social influences in the context of attitude, self-efficacy, intention, and previous behavior as predictors of smoking onset. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1995, 25:237-257.
48. De Vries H, Dijkstra M, Kuhlman P: Self-Efficacy: Third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioral intentions. Health Education Research. 1988, 3:273-282.
49. Nubel: Belgian Food Composition Table, 3th ed. Brussels, Belgium: Ministry of Public Health, 1999.
50. Nevo: Dutch Food Compositions Table 1996. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Stichting Nevo, 1998.
51. Brug J, van Assema P: Differences in use and impact of computer-tailored dietary fat-feedback according to stage of change and education. Appetite. 2000, 34:285-293.
52. Brug J: Dutch research into the development and impact of computer-tailored nutrition education. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1999, 53:S78-S82.
53. Roos E, Lahelma E, Virtanen M, et al.: Gender, socioeconomic status and family status as determinants of food behaviour. Social Science & Medicine. 1998, 46:1519-1529.
54. McVey G, Tweed S, Blackmore E: Correlates of weight loss and muscle-gaining behavior in 10-to 14-year-old males and females. Preventive Medicine. 2005, 40:1-9.
55. Hart KH, Bishop JA, Truby H: An investigation into school children's knowledge and awareness of food and nutrition. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 2002, 15:129-140.
56. Hupkens CLH, Knibbe RA, Van Otterloo AH, Drop MJ: Class differences in the food rules mothers impose on their children: A cross-national study. Social Science & Medicine. 1998, 47:1331-1339.
57. Kaaks RJ: Biochemical markers as additional measurements in studies of the accuracy of dietary questionnaire measurements: Conceptual issues. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1997, 65:S1232-S1239.
58. Baranowski T, Baranowski J, Cullen KW, et al.: Squire Quest!-Dietary Outcome evaluation of a multimedia game. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003, 24:52-61.