Beyond the local/general divide: English for academic purposes and process approaches to cross disciplinary, doctoral writing support

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 449-462

  Bastalich, Wendy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

cross disciplinary curriculum development; doctoral education; research training; writing support

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858660653     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2010.518954     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Askehave, I. and Swales, J. 2001. Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22(2): 195-212.
2. Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings, London: Longman.
3. Bourner, T., Bowden, R. and Laing, S. 2001. Professional doctorates in England. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1): 65-83.
4. Caffarella, R. and Barnett, B. 2000. Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1): 39-52.
5. Council of Australian Deans and Directors of Graduate Studies. 1999, 2005. Guidelines to support the framework for best practice in generic capabilities for research students in Australian universities prepared by R. Wissler and J. Borthwick with input from DDoGS Council members, 2004-2005. Retrieved 2007, from http://www.ddogs.edu.au/download/2133773151
6. Dong, Y. R. 1998. Non-native graduate students' thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two US institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4): 369-390.
7. Dudley-Evans, T. 1999. "The dissertation: A case of neglect?". In Issues in EAP writing research and instruction, Edited by: Thompson, P. 28-36. Reading, UK: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Reading.
8. Hawthorn, J. G. and Conrad, F. C. 1997. Emblems of quality in higher education, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
9. Hinchcliffe, R., Bromley, A. and Hutchinson, S. 2007. Skills training in research degree programmes: Politics and practice, Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
10. Holdaway, E. 1996. Current isses in graduate education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 18(1): 59-74.
11. Holdaway, E. 1997. "Quality issues in postgraduate education". In Beyond the first degree, Edited by: Burgess, R. G. 60-78. Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
12. Holmes, R. 1997. Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of the research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4): 321-337.
13. Hyland, K. 2003. Genre based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1): 17-29.
14. Hyland, K. 2002. Specificity revisited: How far should we go now. English for Specific Purposes, 21(4): 385-395.
15. Hyland, K. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing, London: Longman.
16. Johnson, L., Lee, A. and Green, B. 2000. The PhD and the autonomous self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2): 135-147.
17. Kamler, B. and Thompson, P. 2008. The failure of dissertation advice books: Toward alternative pedagogies for doctoral writing. Educational Researcher, 37(8): 507-514.
18. Kamler, B. and Thompson, P. 2006. Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision, London: Routledge.
19. Kemp, D. 1999. Knowledge and innovation: A policy statement on research and research training, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
20. Kiley, M. and Wisker, G. 2009. Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4): 431-441.
21. Laske, S. and Zuber-Skeritt, O. 1996. "Frameworks for postgraduate research and supervision: An overview". In Frameworks for postgraduate education, Edited by: Zuber-Skerrit, O. 10-31. Lismore, Australia: Southern Cross University Press.
22. Lee, A. and Green, B. 2009. Supervision as metaphor. Studies in Higher Education, 34(6): 615-630.
23. Lockhart, J. C. and Stablein, R. E. 2002. Spanning the academy-practice divide with doctoral education in business. Higher Education Research and Development, 21(2): 191-202.
24. Malfroy, J. and Yates, L. 2003. Knowledge in action: Doctoral programmes forging new identities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(2): 119-129.
25. McAlpine, L. and Norton, J. 2006. Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: An integrative framework for action and research. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1): 3-17.
26. Miller, N. and Brimicombe, A. 2004. Mapping research journeys across complex terrain with heavy baggage. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(3): 405-417.
27. Miller, C. R. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2): 151-167.
28. Manathunga, C. 2005. The development of research supervision: 'Turning the light on a private space'. International Journal for Academic Development, 10(1): 17-30.
29. Paltridge, B. 2004. Academic writing. Language Teaching, 37(2): 87-105.
30. Paltridge, B. 2003. Teaching thesis and dissertation writing. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2): 78-96.
31. Paltridge, B. 2002. Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21(2): 125-143.
32. Pearson, M. and Brew, A. 2002. Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2): 135-150.
33. Pearson, M. 1999. The changing environment for doctoral education in Australia: Implications for quality management, improvement and innovation. Higher Education Research and Development, 18(3): 269-287.
34. Research Councils UK. 2001. Joint statement of the UK Research Councils' training requirements for research students, Retrieved June 2011, from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/researchcareers/jsstrainingrequirements.pdf
35. Samraj, B. 2008. A discourse analysis of master's theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1): 55-67.
36. Silva, T. and Leki, I. 2004. Family matters: The influence of applied linguistics and composition studies on second language writing studies-past, present and future. Modern Language Journal, 88(1): 1-13.
37. Swales, J. 2004. Research genre: Exploration and applications, New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Swales, J. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings, New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Swales, J. and Feak, C. 2004. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills, 2, Ann Arbor, MN: University of Michigan Press.
40. Thompson, P. 1999. "Exploring the contexts of writing: Interviews with PhD supervisors". In Issues in EAP writing research and instruction, Edited by: Thompson, P. 37-54. Reading, UK: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Reading.
41. Wellington, J. and Sikes, P. 2006. 'A doctorate in a tight compartment': Why do students choose a professional doctorate and what impact does it have on their personal and professional lives?. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6): 723-734.
42. Wisker, G., Robinson, G., Trafford, V., Lilly, J. and Warnes, M. 2004. Achieving a doctorate: Metalearning and research development programmes supporting success for international distance students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(4): 473-489.
43. Wisker, G., Robinson, G., Trafford, V., Creighton, E. and Warnes, M. 2003. Recognising and overcoming dissonance in postgraduate student research. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1): 91-105.