Sequencing our way towards understanding global eukaryotic biodiversity

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 233-243

  Bik, Holly M ^a   Porazinska, Dorota L ^b   Creer, Simon ^c   Caporaso, J Gregory ^d   Knight, Rob ^e,f   Thomas, W Kelley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d Northern Arizona University   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^f HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOINFORMATICS; EARTH; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; EUKARYOTE; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; MICROSCOPY; PIPELINE; SAMPLING;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; EUKARYOTE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; REVIEW;

BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EUKARYOTA; GENETIC MARKERS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 84858617141     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.010     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Danovaro R., et al. Exponential decline of deep-sea ecosystem functioning linked to benthic biodiversity loss. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1-18.
2. Wardle D.A. The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:870-886.
3. Wegner Parfrey L., et al. Microbial eukaryotes in the human microbiome: ecology, evolution, and future directions. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2:1-16.
4. 2S Gradient in a supersulfidic Anoxic Fjord (Framvaren, Norway). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72:3626-3636.
5. Groisillier A., et al. Genetic diversity and habitats of two enigmatic marine alveolate lineages. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2006, 42:277-291.
6. Richards T., Bass D. Molecular screening of free-living microbial eukaryotes: diversity and distribution using a meta-analysis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2005, 8:240-252.
7. Rosling A., et al. Archaeorhizomycetes: unearthing an ancient class of ubiqutous soil fungi. Science 2011, 333:876-879.
8. Jones M.D.M., et al. Discovery of novel intermediate forms redefines the fungal tree of life. Nature 2011, 474:200-203.
9. Creer S., et al. Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls, and promises. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:4-20.
10. Porazinska D.L., et al. Evaulating high-throughput sequencing as a method for metagenomic analysis of nematode diversity. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2009, 9:1439-1450.
11. Stoeck T., et al. Multiple marker parallel tag enviornmental DNA sequencing reveals a highly complex eukaryotic community in marine anoxic water. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:21-31.
12. Stoeck T., et al. Massively parallel tag sequencing reveals the complexity of anaerobic marine protistan communities. BMC Biol. 2009, 7:72.
13. Pace N.R. A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science 1997, 276:734-740.
14. Sogin M.L., et al. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the unexplored 'rare biosphere'. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:12115-12120.
15. Amaral-Zettler L., et al. A global census of marine microbes. Life in the World's Oceans: Diversity, Distribution and Abundance 2010, 223-245. Blackwell Publishing. A.D. McIntyre (Ed.).
16. Fierer N., et al. The influence of sex, handedness, and washing on the diversity of hand surface bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:17994-17999.
17. Turnbaugh P.J., et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 2009, 457:480-484.
18. Prokopowich C.D., et al. The correlation between rDNA copy number and genome size in eukaryotes. Genome 2003, 46:48-50.
19. Pei A.Y., et al. Diversity of 16S rRNA genes within individual prokaryotic genomes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76:3886-3897.
20. Zhu F., et al. Mapping of picoeukaryotes in marine ecosystems with a quantitative PCR of the 18S rRNA gene. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2005, 52:79-92.
21. Andersson J.O. Lateral gene transfer in eukaryotes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62:1182-1197.
22. Huber J.A., et al. Microbial population structures in the deep marine biosphere. Science 2007, 318:97-100.
23. Amaral-Zettler L., et al. A method for studying protistan diversity using massively parallel sequencing of V9 hypervariable regions of small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e6372.
24. Medinger R., et al. Diversity in a hidden world: potential an limitation of next-generation sequencing for surveys of molecular diversity of eukaryotic microorganisms. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:32-40.
25. Orsi W., et al. Protistan microbial observatory in the Cariaco Basin, Caribbean. II. Habitat specialization. ISME J. 2011, 5:1357-1373.
26. Edgcomb V., et al. Protistan microbial observatory in the Cariaco Basin, Caribbean. I. Pyrosequencing vs Sanger insights into species richness. ISME J. 2011, 5:1344-1356.
27. Bik H.M., et al. Metagenetic community analysis of microbial eukaryotes illuminates biogeographic patterns in deep-sea and shallow water sediments. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:1048-1059.
28. Nolte V., et al. Contrasting seasonal niche separation between rare and abundant taxa conceals the extent of protist diversity. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:2908-2915.
29. Reeder J., Knight R. Rapidly denoising pyrosequencing amplicon reads by exploiting rank-abundance distributions. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:668-669.
30. Fonseca V.G., et al. Second-generation environmental sequencing unmasks marine metazoan biodiversity. Nat. Commun. 2010, 1:98.
31. Behnke A., et al. Depicting more accurate pictures of protistan community complexity using pyrosequencing of hypervariable SSU rRNA gene regions. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13:340-349.
32. Lecroq B., et al. Ultra-deep sequencing of foraminiferal microbarcodes unveils hidden richness of early monothalamous lineages in deep-sea sediments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:13177-13182.
33. Chariton A., et al. Ecological assessment of estuarine sediments by pyrosequencing eukaryotic ribosomal DNA. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2010, 8:233-238.
34. Hajibabaei M., et al. Environmental barcoding: a next-generation sequencing approach for biomonitoring applications using river benthos. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e17497.
35. Pfrender M.E., et al. Assessing macroinvertebrate biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems: advances and challenges in DNA-based approaches. Q. Rev. Biol. 2010, 85:319-340.
36. Emerson B., et al. Phylogeny, phylogeography, phylobetadiversity and the molecular analysis of biological communities. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2011, 366:2391-2402.
37. Purdy K.J., et al. Systems biology for ecology: from molecules to ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2010, 43:87-149.
38. Quince C., et al. Removing noise from pyrosequenced amplicons. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12:38.
39. Matsen F.A., et al. pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood Bayesian phyogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11:538.
40. Berger S.A., Stamatakis A. Aligning short reads to reference alignments and trees. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:2068-2075.
41. Edgar R.C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:2460-2461.
42. Schloss P.D., et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75:7537-7541.
43. Li W., Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:1658-1659.
44. Cai Y., Sun Y. ESPRIT-Tree: hierarchial clustring analysis of millions of 16S rRNA pyrosequences in quasilinear computational time. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:e95.
45. Cole J.R., et al. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:D141-D145.
46. DeSantis T., et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72:5069-5072.
47. Caporaso J.G., et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:335-336.
48. Caporaso J.G., et al. Host-associated and free-living phage communities differ profoundly in phylogenetic composition. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e16900.
49. Haas B.J., et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 2011, 21:494-504.
50. Edgar R.C., et al. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:2194-2200.
51. Pruesse E., et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35:7188-7196.
52. Lozupone C., et al. Unifrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. ISME J. 2011, 5:169-172.
53. Cline M.S., et al. Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2:2366-2383.
54. Clarke, K. and Gorley, R. (2006) PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial, PRIMER-E.
55. Blankenberg D., et al. Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2010, 19.10.1-21.
56. Parks D.H., et al. GenGIS: a geospatial information system for genomic data. Genome Res. 2009, 19:1896-1904.
57. Callahan S.P., et al. VisTrails: visualization meets data management. Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD, June 27-29, 2006 2006, 745-747.
58. Matsen, F.A. and Evans, S. (2011) Edge principal components and squash clustering: using the special structure of phylogenetic placement data for sample comparison. ar Xiv:1107.5095v1101.
59. Bellemain E., et al. ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: an in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10:189.
60. Christen R. Global sequencing: a review of current molecular data and new methods available to assess microbial diversity. Microbes Environ. 2008, 23:253-268.
61. Seshadri R., et al. CAMERA: a community resource for metagenomics. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e75.
62. Meyer F., et al. The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9:386.
63. Field D., et al. The Genomic Standards Consortium. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1001088.
64. Yilmaz P., et al. Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29:415-420.
65. Wang Q., et al. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73:5261-5267.
66. Werner J.J., et al. Impact of training sets on classification of high-throughput bacerial 16S rRNA gene surveys. ISME J. 2012, 6:94-103.
67. Pirrung M., et al. TopiaryExplorer: visualizing large phylogenetic trees with environmental metadata. Bioinformatics 2011, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr517.
68. Wegener Parfrey L., et al. Broadly sampled multigene analyses yield a well-resolved eukaryotic tree of life. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:518-533.
69. Dover G. Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature 1982, 299:111-117.
70. Averbeck K.T., Eickbush T.H. Monitoring the mode and tempo of concerted evolution in Drosophila melanogaster rDNA locus. Genetics 2005, 171:1837-1846.
71. James S.A., et al. Repetitive sequence variation and dynamics in the ribosomal DNA array of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as revealed by whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res. 2009, 19:626-635.
72. Santos S.R., et al. Molecular characterization of nuclear small subunit (18S)-rDNA pseudogenes in a symbiotic dinoflagellate (Symbiodinium, Dinophyta). J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2003, 50:417-421.
73. Schlöetterer C., Tautz D. Chromosomal homogeneity of Drosophila ribosomal DNA arrays suggests intrachromosomal exchanges drive concerted evolution. Curr. Biol. 1994, 4:777-783.
74. Pawlowski J., et al. Eukaryotic richness in the abyss: insights from Pyrotag sequencing. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e18169.
75. Dell'Anno A., Danovaro R. Extracellular DNA plays a key role in deep-sea ecosystem functioning. Science 2005, 309:2179.
76. Binladen J., et al. The use of coded PCR primers enables high-throughput sequencing of multiple homolog amplification products by 454 parallel sequencing. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e197.
77. Hamady M., et al. Error-correcting barcoded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex. Nat. Methods 2008, 5:235-237.
78. Ivanova N.V., et al. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 7:544-548.
79. Matzen da Silva J., et al. Systematic and evolutionary insights derived from mtDNA COI barcode diversity in the Decapoda (Crustacea: Malacostraca). PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e19449.
80. Feinstein L.M., et al. Assessment of bias associated with incomplete extraction of microbial DNA from soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75:5428-5433.
81. Engelbrektson A., et al. Experimental factors affecting PCR-based estimates of microbial species richness and evenness. ISME J. 2010, 4:642-647.
82. Hong S., et al. Polymerase chain reaction primers miss half of rRNA microbial diversity. ISME J. 2009, 3:1365-1373.
83. Valkiunas G., et al. A comparative analysis of microscopy and PCR-based detection methods for blood parasites. J. Parasitol. 2008, 94:1395-1401.
84. Desquesnes M., Dávila A.M.R. Applications of PCR-based tools for detection and identification of animal trypanosomes: a review and perspectives. Vet. Parasitol. 2002, 109:213-231.
85. Huse S.M., et al. Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing. Genome Biol. 2007, 8:R143.
86. Gilles A., et al. Accuracy and quality assessment of 454 GS-FLX Titanium pyrosequencing. BMC Genomics 2011, 12:245.
87. Porazinska D.L., et al. Linking operational clustered taxonomic units (OCTUs) from parallel ultra sequencing (PUS) to nematode species. Zootaxa 2010, 2427:55-63.
88. Porazinska D.L., et al. Reproducibility of read numbers in high-throughput sequencing analysis of nematode community composition and structure. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2009, 10:666-676.
89. Pester M., et al. A 'rare biosphere' microorganism contributes to sulfate reduction in a peatland. ISME J. 2010, 4:1591-1602.
90. Creer S. Second-generation seequencing derived insights into the temporal biodiversity dynamics of freshwater protists. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:2829-2831.
91. Smyth R.P., et al. Reducing chimera formation during PCR amplification to ensure accurate genotyping. Gene 2010, 469:45-51.
92. Quince C., et al. Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:639-641.
93. Huse S.M., et al. Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12:1889-1898.
94. Shapiro L.H., et al. Molecular phylogeny of Banza (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae), the endemic katydids of the Hawaiian Archipelago. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 41:53-63.
95. Pandey R., et al. CANGS: a user-friendly utility for processing and analyzing 454 GS-FLX data in biodiversity studies. BMC Res. Notes 2010, 12:182.
96. Kumar S., et al. CLOTU: an online pipeline for processing and clustering of 454 amplicon reads into OTUs followed by taxonomic annotation. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12:182.
97. Sun Y., et al. ESPRIT: estimating species richness uing large collections of 16S rRNA pyrosequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:e76.
98. Huson D.H., et al. Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. Genome Res. 2011, 21:1552-1560.
99. Greenberg J. Theoretical considerations of lifecycle modeling: an analysis of the Dryad repository demonstrating automatic metadata propagation, inheritance, and value system adoption. Cataloging Classification Q. 2009, 47:380-402.
100. Hankeln W., et al. MetaBar - a tool for consistent contextual data acquisition and standards compliant submission. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11:358.