Group awareness tools for controversial CSCL discussions: Dissociating rating effects and visualized feedback effects

Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL 2011 Conference Proceedings - Long Papers, 9th International Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 358-365

  Buder, Jürgen ^a   Bodemer, Daniel ^b  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS TOOL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; FEEDBACK EFFECTS; GROUP AWARENESS; GROUP DISCUSSIONS; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; TOOL CONDITION;

RATING;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84858417530     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.
2. Bodemer, D. (2011). Tacit guidance for collaborative multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1079-1086.
3. Buder, J. (2007). Net-based knowledge-communication in groups: Searching for added value. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 215(4), 209-217.
4. Buder, J. (2011). Group awareness tools for learning: Current and future directions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1114-1117.
5. Buder, J., & Bodemer, D. (2008). Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 123-139.
6. Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2011). Guiding knowledge communication in CSCL via group knowledge awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1068-1078.
7. Engelmann, T., Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., & Buder, J. (2009). Knowledge awareness in CSCL: A psychological perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 25(4), 949-960.
8. Engelmann, T., & Hesse, F.W. (2010). How digital concept maps about the collaborators' knowledge and information influence computer-supported collaborative problem solving. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 299-320.
9. Froming, W. J., Walker, G. R., & Lopyan, K. J. (1982). Public and private self-awareness: When personal attitudes conflict with societal expectations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(5), 476-487.
10. Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (1995). Support for group awareness in real-time desktop conferences. In: Proceedings of the Second New Zealand Computer Science Research Students' Conference. (University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand), April 18-21, 1995.
11. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualizion of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64. (Pubitemid 127705284)
12. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Group awareness tools: It's what you do with it that matters. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1046-1058.
13. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research, 49(1), 51-69.
14. Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 557-571. (Pubitemid 33594514)
15. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159-185. (Pubitemid 44825055)
16. Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: Effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281-310. (Pubitemid 36900821)
17. Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students' argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning & Instruction, 16(5), 492-509. (Pubitemid 44661054)
18. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. A., Erkens, G., & Jaspers, J. (2011). Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1087-1102.
19. Sangin, M., Molinari, G., Nüssli, M.-A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2011). Facilitating peer knowledge modeling: Effects of a knowledge awareness tool on collaborative learning outcomes and processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1059-1067.
20. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court.
21. Stasser, G. (1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussions. In S. Worchel, W. Wood. & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 48-67). Newbury Park: Sage
22. Stewart, D.D. & Stasser, G. (1998). The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The role of an informed minority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 95-113. (Pubitemid 128365846)
23. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A metaanalytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 323-345. (Pubitemid 24977768)