A systemic model of interaction analysis in CSCL

Proceedings of the 10th IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 463-469

  Liao, Jian ^a   Li, Yanyan ^a   Wang, Jingjing ^a   Huang, Ronghuai ^a   Zhang, Zhenhong ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL); Interactive analysis, collaborative knowledge building (CKB); Process Pattern; Social network analysis; Topic analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING (CSCL); INTERACTIVE ANALYSIS, COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE BUILDING (CKB); PROCESS PATTERN; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; TOPIC ANALYSIS;

ACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS; BRACES (FOR LIMBS AND JOINTS); CESIUM ALLOYS; EDUCATION; ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; INTEROPERABILITY; TRAVELING SALESMAN PROBLEM;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 62449283169     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Koschmann, T. Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction[A]. Koschmann, T. (Ed.). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm[C]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence, 1996, 1-23
2. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M.J., Blaye, A.&O' Malley, C. The evolution of research on collaborative learning[A].Dans P.Reimann&H. Spada(Eds.). Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science[C].Oxford: Pergamon, 1996.189-211
3. Henri, P. Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Kaye, A.R(Ed.), Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, p117-136.
4. Newman, D., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C.A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 3(2), p56-77.
5. Gunawardena, Lowe, & Anderson. Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431
6. Scardamalia, M. "Collective Cognitive Responisbility for the Advancement of knowledge". IKIT, OISE, University of Toronoto, http://db.ikit.org:37495(15/02/2004)
7. Zhu, E. Meaning negotiation, Knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis.
8. Bullen, M. Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1-32.
9. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. Assessing social presence in asynchronoustext-based computer conferencing (Vol. 14, pp. 50-71).
10. Palonen, T., & Hakkarainen, K. Patterns of interaction in computer-supported learning: A social network analysis. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 334-339.
11. Fahy, P. J., Crawford, G., & Ally, M. Patterns of interaction in a computer conference transcript. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(1), 1-24.
12. Jarvela, S., & Hakkinen, P. Web-based Cases in Teaching and Learning - the Quality of Discussions and a Stage of Perspective Taking in Asynchronous Communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 10(1), 1-22.
13. Veldhuis-Diermanse, CSCLearning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen, Netherlands: University of Wageningen, 2002.
14. Law, N., & Wong, E. Developmental Trajectory in Knowledge Building: An Investigation. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2003 (pp. 57-66). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Law, N. Assessing Learning Outcomes in CSCL Settings. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL) 2005, Ta ipei.
16. Rachel Pilkington, Analysing Educational Dialogue Interaction: Towards Models that Support Learning, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education(2001), 12, 1-7
17. Simoff, S. Monitoring and evaluation in collaborative learning environments. Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
18. Vizcaíno, A. Negative situations in collaborative environments: Can a simulated student avoid them? In J. D. Moore, C. Redfield & W. L. Johnson (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-Ed in the Wired and Wireless future (pp. 610-612). Amsterdam: IOS.
19. Gassner, K. Using patterns to reveal e-mail communication structures. In J. Mostow & P. Tedesco (Eds.) Designing Computational Models of Collaborative Learning Interaction, workshop at. ITS 2004 (pp. 77-82). Maceió, Brazil.
20. Avouris, N., Komis, V., Margaritis, M., & Fiotakis, G. An environment for studying collaborative learning activities. Educational Technology & Society, 7(2), 34-41.
21. Engestrom, Y. Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach To development research[M].Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit, 1987
22. Douglas B. Clark, Victor D. Sampson, Analyzing the Quality of Argumentation Supported by Personally-Seeded Discussions CSCL, the Proceedings of CSCL'2005
23. Roschelle, J. "Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change". In T. Koschmann(Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an Emerging Paradigm, Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 209-248
24. Amy Soller, Alejandra Martínez Monés, Patrick Jermann, Martin Muehlenbrock, From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education Volume 15, Number 4, 2005 :261-290
25. Law.N. A Learnable Content & Participation Analysis Toolkit for Assessing CSCL Learning Outcomes and Processes Preceedings of CSCL2007 (in Press)
26. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. "Computer support for knowledge-building communities". The Journal of the Learning Scinces, 3(3), pp. 265-283
27. Fisher, E. Distinctive features of pupil-pupil classroom talk and their relationship to learning: How discursive exploration might be encouraged. Language and Education 7/4: 239-257.
28. Hee-Jeon, Suh, A Case Study on Identifying Group Interaction Patterns of Collaborative Knowledge Construction Process, Available at http://www.icce2001.org/cd/pdf/P05/KR022.pdf
29. Andreas Harrer, Interaction Analysis at Coordination Level with Semi-structured Interfaces, ECAI2000, Germany
30. Barros, B., & Verdejo, M.F. Analysing student interaction processes in order to improve collaboration. The DEGREE approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 221-241.
31. Tedesco, P. MArCo: Building an artificial conflict mediator to support group planning interactions. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 117-155.
32. McMillan, DW, & Chavis, DM. Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
33. Inaba, A., & Okamoto, T.. Development of the intelligent discussion support system for collaborative learning. Proceedings of ED-TELECOM '96, (pp. 137-142). Boston, MA.
34. Vieira, A. C., Teixeira, L., Timóteo, A., Tedesco, P., Barros, F. A. Analyzing on-line collaborative dialogues: The OXEnTCHÊ-Chat. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2004 (pp. 315-324). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
35. Gunawardena, Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147-166.
36. McManus, M., & Aiken, R. Monitoring computer-based problem solving. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(4), 307-336.
37. Haythornthwaite, C. Networks of information sharing among computer-supported distance learners, InProceedings of the Computer-Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference, C. Hoadley & Roschelle (Eds.), Dec. 12-15, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, Mahwah, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum Associates.
38. Nurmela, K., Lehtinen, E., & Palonen, T. Evaluating CSCL Log Files by Social Network Analysis. InC. Hoadley (Ed.), Proceedings of CSCL '99: The Third International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 434-444). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Maarten de Laat, Network and content analysis in an online community discourse, Proceedings of CSCL 2002
39. Albrecht, T. L. & Hall, B.. Relational and content differences between elites and outsiders in innovation networks, Human Communication Research, 17(4): 535-561.
40. Christophe Reffay & Thierry Chanier, Social Network Analysis Used for Modelling, Available at http://lifc.univ-fcomte.fr/RECHERCHE/P7/pub/ ITS02/reffayIts.pdf
41. Stahl, G. (2003). Building Collaborative knowing: Elements of a social theory of learning. In J.-W. Strijbos, P. Kirschner&R. Martens(Eds.), What we know about CSCL in higher education. Amsterdam, NL: Kluwer. http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/cscl/papers/ch16.htm