Grammatical collocations and verb-particle constructions in Brussels French: A corpus-linguistic approach to transfer

International Journal of Bilingualism

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 53-82

  Treffers Daller, Jeanine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

collocations; French; language contact; replication; transfer; verb particle constructions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858322512     PISSN: 13670069     EISSN: 17566878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1367006911403213     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abercrombie D.Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1967:.
2. Baetens Beardsmore H.Le français régional de Bruxelles. Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institut de Phonétique, conférences et travaux 3. Bruxelles: Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles; 1971:.
3. Ball R.Colloquial French grammar: A practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell; 2000:.
4. Bauche H.Le français populaire. Paris: Payot; 1920:.
5. Beavers J.,Levin B.,Tham S.W.The typology of motion expressions revisited.Journal of Linguistics. 2010;46:331-377.
6. Booij G.Separable complex verbs in Dutch: A case of periphrastic word formation.Verb-particle explorations. Dehé N., ed. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 2002:21-42.
7. Booij G.Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010:.
8. Canale M.,Mougeon R.,Bélanger M.,Main C.Recherches en dialectologie franco-ontarienne.Working Papers on Bilingualism. 1977;14:1-20.
9. Chevalier G.,Long M.Finder out pour qu'on les frigge pas up, comment c'qui workont out: Les verbes à particules en chiac.Français d'Amérique: Approches morphosyntaxiques. Actes du colloque international Grammaire comparée des variétés de français d'Amérique. Brasseur P.Falkert A., ed. Paris: L'Harmattan; 2005:201-212.
10. Verb-particle explorations. Dehé N.Jackendoff R.McIntyre A.Urban S., ed. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 2002:.
11. Desmet P.,Klein J.-R.,Lamiroy B.Vous dites?! Répertoire d'erreurs courantes en français chez les néerlandophones. Leuven & Voorburg: Acco; 2004:.
12. De Vriendt S.Brussels. Tielt: Lannoo; 2004:.
13. De Vriendt S.,Willemyns R.Sociolinguistic aspects: Linguistic research on Brussels.The interdisciplinary study of urban bilingualism in Brussels. Witte E.Baetens Beardsmore H., ed. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 1987:195-231.
14. Dufresne M.,Dupuis F.,Tremblay M.Preverbs and particles in Old French.Yearbook of morphology. Booij G.van Marle J., ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press; 2003:33-60.
15. Foulet L.L'effacement des adverbs de lieu.Romania. 1946;69:1-79.
16. Francard M.,Latin D.Le régionalisme lexical. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot; 1995:.
17. Gadet F.La variation sociale en français. Paris: Ophrys; 2007:.
18. Granger S.,Paquot M.Disentangling the phraseological web.Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective. Granger S.Meunier F., ed. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins; 2008:27-50.
19. Gsell O.La rosas dattan ora - les röses da fora - le rose danno fuori: Verbalperiphrasen mit Ortsadverb im Rätoromanischen und im Italienischen.Fakten und Theorien. Festschrift für Helmut Stimm. Heinz S.Wandruszka U., ed. Tübingen: Günter Narr; 1982:71-85.
20. Harley B.,King M.-L.Verb lexis in the written compositions of young L2 learners.Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1989;11:415-440.
21. Heine B.,Kuteva T.Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005:.
22. Hickmann M.The relativity of motion in first language acquisition.Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories. Hickmann M.Robert S., ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2006:281-308.
23. Hickmann M.,Hendriks H.Static and dynamic location in French and English.First Language. 2006;26:103-135.
24. Holmes G.The problem of anglicized French at the university.Canadian Modern Language Review. 1977;33:520-531.
25. Iacobini C.,Masini F.The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: Locative and actional meanings.Morphology. 2006;16:155-188.
26. Jaberg K.Quelques caractères généraux du Romanche.Mélanges de linguistique offerts à Charles Bally par des collègues, des confrères, des disciples reconnaissants. Sechehaye C.-A., ed. Genève: Georg; 1939:.
27. Jackendoff R.English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax.Verb-particle explorations. Dehé N., ed. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 2002:67-94.
28. Janssens R.Taalgebruik in Brussel. Taalverhoudingen, taal-verschuivingen en taalidentiteit in een meertalige stad. Brussel: VUB Press; 2001:.
29. Jarvis S.Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon.Language Learning. 2000;50:245-309.
30. Jarvis S.,Pavlenko A.Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York & London: Routledge; 2008:.
31. Jones M. A.Foundations of French syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996:.
32. Judge A.,Healey F. G.A reference grammar of modern French. London: Edward Arnold; 1985:.
33. King R.The semantic and syntactic reanalysis of lexical borrowings. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins; 2000:.
34. King R.Joual in context. Overview and evaluation of Acadie's joual.Social lives in language-sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities: Celebrating the work of Gillian Sankoff. Sankoff G.Meyerhoff M.Nagy N., ed. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins; 2008:137-177.
35. Kopecka A.The relativity of motion in first language acquisition.Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories. Hickmann M.Roberts S., ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2006:83-101.
36. Kramer J.Die Übernahme der deutschen und der niederlaendischen Konstruktion Verb + Verbzusatz durch die Nachbarsprachen.Sprachkontakt als Ursache von Veraenderungen der Sprach- und Bewusstseinsstruktur. Meid W.Heller K., ed. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beitraege zur Sprachwissenschaft; 1981:.
37. Lumsden J. F.Language acquisition and creolization.Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development. Learning, development and conceptual change. DeGraff M., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999:129-160.
38. MacWhinney B.The Childes project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000:.
39. Magnus I.La structure de la phrase en français et en néerlandais: Comparaison des organisations syntaxique, sémantique et pragmatique.Revue Romane. 2007;42:80-102.
40. Malvern D. D.,Richards B. J.,Chipere N.,Durán P.Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004:.
41. Marchello-Nizia C.Prépositions françaises en diachronie.Lingvisticae Investigationes. 2002;25:205-221.
42. Matras Y.,Sakel J.Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence.Studies in Language. 2004;31:829-865.
43. Matras Y.,Sakel J.Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 2007:.
44. Mayer M.Frog where are you?. New York: Dial Books for Young Readers; 1969:.
45. Meyer-Lübke W.Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft; 1899:.
46. Mougeon R.,Beniak E.Linguistic consequences of language. Contact and restriction: The case of French in Ontario, Canada. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991:.
47. Mougeon R.,Brent P.,Bélanger M.,Cicocki W.Le français parlé en situation minoritaire. Vol. 1. Emploi et maitrise du français parlé par les élèves des écoles de langue française dans les communautés franco-ontariennes minoritaires. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education; 1980:.
48. Mougeon R.,Nadasdi T.,Rehner K.Contact-induced linguistic innovations on the continuum of language use: The case of French in Ontario.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2005;8:99-115.
49. Rohlfs G.Romanische Lehnübersetzungen aus germanischer Grundlage: materia romana, spirito germanico. München: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften; 1983:.
50. RoyM.-M. (1979). Les conjonctions «but» et «so» dans le parler de Moncton. MA thesis, Université du Québec à Montréal.
51. Sakel J.Types of loan: Matter and pattern.Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective. Matras Y.Sakel J., ed. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 2007:15-29.
52. Schlyter S.L'acquisition des verbes de déplacement/mouvement par des adultes suédois. Papers from the Institute of Linguistics; 1984University of Stockholm (PILUS) 52; 1984.
53. Sharwood Smith M.,Kellerman E.Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition: An introduction.Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. Kellerman E.Sharwood Smith M., ed. New York: Pergamon Institute of English; 1986:1-9.
54. Slobin D. I.The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events.Relating events in narrative: Vol 2. Typological and contextual perspectives. Strömqvist S.Verhoeven L., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2004:219-257.
55. Talmy L.Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms.Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Volume III of Language typology and syntactic description. Shopen T., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985:57-149.
56. Talmy L.Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. I. Toward a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000:.
57. Thomason S. G.,Kaufman T.Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1988:.
58. Treffers-Daller J.Borrowing and shift-induced interference: Contrasting patterns in French-Germanic contact in Brussels and Strasbourg.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 1999;2:1-22.
59. Treffers-Daller J.Operationalising and measuring language dominance.International Journal of Bilingualism.
60. Treffers-Daller J.,Tidball F.Learnability and event construal among French learners of English and British learners of French.
61. Tremblay M.Back en français acadien: Archaïsme ou innovation?.Français d'Amérique: Approches morphosyntaxiques. Brasseur P.Falkert A., ed. Paris: L'Harmattan; 2005:263-273.
62. Trudgill P.The impact of language contact and social structure on linguistic structure: Focus on the dialects of Modern Greek.Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective. Kortmann B., ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 2004:435-451.
63. VekemansM. (1963). De invloed van de Brussels-Vlaamse volkstaal op de Brussels-Franse volkstaal [The influence of the Brussels Dutch variety on the Brussels French variety]. Master's thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain.
64. Vincent N.The evolution of C-structure: Prepositions and PPs from Indo-European to Romance.Linguistics. 1999;37:1111-1153.
65. YoungH. (2002). C'est either que tu parles français, c'est either que tu parles anglais: A cognitive approach to Chiac as a contact language. PhD dissertation, Rice University.