Assessment of genetic diversity in two-species oak seed stands and their progeny populations

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 2-9

  Dering, Monika ^a   Chybicki, Igor ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF DENDROLOGY   (Poland)

^b KAZIMIERZ WIELKI UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Genetic diversity; microsatellites; natural regeneration; progeny plantations; white oaks

Indexed keywords

GENETIC DIVERSITY; MICROSATELLITES; NATURAL REGENERATION; PROGENY PLANTATIONS; WHITE OAK;

BIODIVERSITY; DNA SEQUENCES; GENES;

ECOLOGY;

PETREA; QUERCUS; QUERCUS ALBA; QUERCUS ROBUR;

EID: 84858315634     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2011.631934     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anonymous 2009. Program zachowania lesnych zasobów genowych i hodowli selekcyjnej drzew w Polsce na lata 2011-2035. [The programme for the conservation of the forest genetic resources and forest tree improvement in Poland in period 2011-2035]. Instytut Badawczy Lesnictwa (In Polish), Warszawa.
2. Bodénès, C., Labbé, T., Pradère, S. and Kremer, A. 1997. General vs. local differentiation between two closely related white oak species. Molecular Ecology, 6: 713-724.
3. Boratyński, A., Marcysiak, K., Lewandowska, A., Jasińska, A. and Iszkulo, G. 2010. Interrelations among con-generic and co-occurring tree species: Asymmetric hybridization and the high success of Quercus petrea (Matt.) Lieb. Regeneration in mixed Q. petrea/Q. robur stands. Polish Journal of Ecology, 58: 273-283.
4. Bradshaw, R.H.W. 2004. Past anthropogenic influence on European forests and some possible genetic consequences. Forest Ecology and Management, 197: 203-212.
5. Bürgi, M. and Schuler, A. 2003. Driving forces of forest management- an analysis of regeneration practices in the forests of the Swiss Central Plateau during the 19th and 20th century. Forest Ecology and Management, 176: 173-183.
6. Chybicki, I. 2006. Przeplyw genów w naturalnym odnowieniu sosny zwyczajnej (Pinus sylvestris L.) oraz debu szypulkowego (Quercus robur L.) i bezszypulkowego (Quercus petrea (Matt.) Liebl.). [Gene flow in natural regeneration of Scots pine and sessile and pedunculate oaks]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kórnik Poland, 2006 (In Polish).
7. Chybicki, I. and Burczyk, J. 2010. Realized gene flow within mixed stands of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. revealed at the stage of naturally established seedling. Molecular Ecology, 19: 2137-2151.
8. Chybicki, I., Trojankiewicz, M., Oleksa, A., Dzialuk, A. and Burczyk, J. 2009. Isolation-by-distance within naturally established populations of European beech (Fagus sylvatica). Botany, 87: 791-798.
9. Curtu, A. L., Gailing, O. and Finkeldey, R. 2009. Patterns of contemporary hybridization inferred from paternity analysis in a four-oak-species forest. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9: 284
10. Cottrell, J. E., Munro, R. C., Tabbener, H. E., Milner, A. D., Forrest, G.I. and Lowe, A. 2003. Comparison of fine scale genetic structure within two British oakwoods using microsatellite; impacts of recolonization dynamics and past management. Forest Ecology and Management, 176: 287-303.
11. Czerepko, J., Boczoń, A., Ciesla, A., Forycka, A., Ksepko, M.Obidziński, A. 2008. Stan róznorodnosci biologicznej lasów w Polsce (Biodiversity condition of Polish forests on the basis of monitoring plots), Warsaw: Instytut Badawczy Lesnicta.
12. Degen, B., Streiff, R. and Ziegenhagen, B. 1999. Comparative study of genetic variation and differentiation of two pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) stands using microsatellite and allozyme loci. Heredity, 83: 597-603.
13. Dow, B. D., Ashley, M. V. and Howe, H. F. 1995. Characterization of highly variable (GT/CT)n microsatellite in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 91: 137-141.
14. Dzialuk, A., Chybicki, I. and Burczyk, J. 2005. PCR multiplexing of nuclear microsatellite loci in Quercus species. Plant Molecular Biology Reports, 23: 121-128.
15. Excoffier, L., Laval, G. and Schneider, S. 2005. Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online, 1: 47-50.
16. Finkeldey, R. and Ziehe, M. 2004. Genetic implications of silvicultural regimes. Forest Ecology and Management, 197: 231-244.
17. Gauli, A., Gailing, O., Stefenon, V.M. and Finkeldey, R. 2009. Genetic similarity of natural populations of Pinus roxburghi Sarg. In Nepal. Annals of Forest Science, 66: 703-712.
18. Goudet, J. 2002. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversity and fixation indices (version 2.9.3) from http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm
19. Gömöry, D. 1992. Effect of stand origin on the genetic diversity of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) populations. Forest Ecology and Management, 54: 215-223.
20. Hosius, B., Leinemann, L., Konnert, M. and Bergman, F. 2006. Genetic aspects of forestry in the Central Europe. European Journal of Forest Research, 125: 407-417.
21. Icgen, Y., Kaya, Z., Cengel, B., Velioglu, E., Öztürk, H. and Önde, S. 2006. Potential impact of forest management of Turkish pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) plantations in Turkey. Forest Ecology and Management, 225: 328-336.
22. Kempfer, S., Lexer, C., Glossl, J. and Steinkeler, H. 1998. Characterization of (GA)n microsatellite loci from Quercus robur. Hereditas, 129: 183-196.
23. Koski, V., Skrøppa, T., Paule, L., Wolf, H. and Turok, J. 1997. Technical guidelines for genetic conservation of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.
24. Konnert, M. and Ruetz, W. 2003. Influence of nursery practices on the genetic structure of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedling populations. Forest Ecology and Management, 184: 193-200.
25. Konnert, M. and Ruetz, W. 2006. Genetic aspects of artificial regeneration of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menzisii) in Bavaria. European Journal of Forest Research, 125: 261-270.
26. Kosińska, J., Lewandowski, A. and Chalupka, W. 2007. Genetic variability of Scots pine maternal populations and their progenies. Silva Fennica, 41: 5-12.
27. Kremer, A., Dupouey, J. L., Deans, J. D., Cottrell, J., Csaikl, U.Finkeldey, U. 2002. Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petrea is stable across western European mixed oak stands. Annals of Forest Science, 59: 777-787.
28. Kremer, A. and Petit, R. J. 1993. Gene diversity in natural populations of oak species. Annals of Forest Science, 50(Suppl. 1): 186-202.
29. Lefèvre, F. 2004. Human impacts on forest genetic resources in the temperate zone: Un updated review. Forest Ecology and Management, 197: 257-271.
30. Lepais, O. and Gerber, S. 2010. Reproductive patterns shape introgression dynamics and species succession within the European white oaks species complex. Evolution, 65: 156-170.
31. Mariette, S., Cottrell, J., Csaikl, U. M., Goikoechea, P., König, A.Löwe, A. J. 2002. Comparision of levels of genetic diversity detected with AFLP and microsatellite markers within and among mixed Q. petrea (Matt.) Lieb. And Q. robur L. stands. Silvae Genetica, 51: 72-79.
32. Matras, J., Burzyński, G., Czart, J., Fonder, W., Korczyk, A.Puchniarski, T. 1993. Program zachowania lesnych zasobów genowych i hodowli selekcyjnej drzew lesnych w Polsce na lata 1991-2010. [The programme for the conservation of the forest genetic resources and forest tree improvement in Poland in period 1991-2010], Warszawa: Centrum Informacyjne Lasów Państwowych (In Polish).
33. Moreau, F., Kleinschmit, J. and Kremer, A. 1994. Molecular differentiation between Q. petrea and Q. robur assessed by random amplified DNA fragments. Forest Genetics, 1: 51-64.
34. Muona, O., Harju, A. and Kärkkäinen, K. 1988. Genetic composition of natural and nursery grown seedlings of Pinus sylvestris using allozymes. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 3: 37-46.
35. Nakanisi, A., Tomaru, N., Yoshimaru, H., Manabe, T. and Yamamoto, S. 2005. Interannual genetic heterogeneity of pollen pools accepted by Quercus salicina individuals. Molecular Ecology, 14: 4469-4478.
36. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics, New York: Columbia University Press.
37. Neophytou, C., Aravanopolus, F. A., Fink, S. and Dounavi, A. 2010. Detecting interspecific and geographic differentiation patterns in two interfertile oak species (Quercus petrea (Matt.) Lieb. and Quercus robur L.) using small sets of microsatellite markers. Forest Ecology and Management, 259: 2026-2035.
38. Petit, R. J., Bodénès, C., Ducousso, A., Roussel, G. and Kremer, A. 2004. Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytologist, 161: 151-164.
39. Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248 - 249. http://genepop.curtin.edu.au/
40. Rajora, O. P. and Mosseler, A. 2001. Challenges and opportunities for conservation of forest resources. Euphytica, 118: 197-212.
41. Schwartz, M. K., Luikart, G. and Waples, R. S. 2006. Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22: 25-33.
42. Sigaud, P., Palmberg-Lerche, C. H. and Hald, S. 2000. "International action in the management of forest genetic resources: Status and challenges". In XXI IUFRO World Congress, 7-12 August, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Pramaju Sdn. Bhd., Sub-Plenary Sessions Edited by: Krishnapillay, B., Soepadmo, E., Arshad, N. L., Wong, A. H. H., Appanah, S.Wan Chik, S. 91-99.
43. Ståhl, P. and Koski, V. 2000. "Impacts of silviculture and forest management on genetic diversity of trees". In XXI IUFRO World Congress, 7-12 August, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Pramaju Sdn. Bhd., Sub-Plenary Session Edited by: Krishnapillay, B., Soepadmo, E., Arshad, N. L., Wong, A. H. H., Appanah, S.Wan Chik, S. 110-119.
44. Steinkeller, H., Fluch, S., Turetschek, E., Lexer, C., Kremer, A.Burg, K. 1997. Identification and characterization of (GA/CT)n microsatellite loci from Quercus petrea. Plant Molecular and Biology, 33: 1093-1096.
45. Streiff, R., Labbe, T., Bacilieri, R., Steinkellner, H., Glossl, J. and Kremer, A. 1998. Within-population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petrea (Matt.) Lieb. Assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Molecular Ecology, 7: 317-328.
46. Thomas, B. R., Macdonald, S. E., Hicks, M., Adams, D. L. and Hodgetts, R. B. 1999. Effects of reforestation methods on genetic diversity of lodgepole pine: An assessment using microsatellite and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 98: 793-801.
47. Vellend, M. and Geber, M. 2005. Connections between species diversity and genetic diversity. Ecological Letters, 8: 767-781.
48. Waples, R. S. 1989. A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency. Genetics, 121: 379-391.
49. Zanetto, A., Roussel, G. and Kremer, A. 1994. Geographgical variation of interspecific differentiation between Quercus robur L. and Quercus petrea (Matt.) Liebl. Forest Genetics, 1: 111-113.