Genetic similarity of natural populations and plantations of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. in Nepal

Annals of Forest Science

Volumn 66, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 703-703

  Gauli, Archana ^a   Gailing, Oliver ^a,b   Stefenon, Valdir Marcos ^a,c   Finkeldey, Reiner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Federal University of the Pampa   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Chloroplast microsatellites; Forest reproductive material; Genetic differentiation; Genetic diversity; Nuclear microsatellites

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ALLELE; CHLOROPLAST; CONIFEROUS FOREST; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC STRUCTURE; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING; PLANTATION;

ASIA; EURASIA; NEPAL; SOUTH ASIA;

PINUS ROXBURGHII;

EID: 70449564761     PISSN: 12864560     EISSN: 1297966X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/forest/2009053     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arya S., Kalia R.K., and Arya I.D., 2000. Induction of somatic embryogenesis in Pinus roxburghii Sarg. Plant Cell Rep. 19: 775-780.
2. Auckland L.D., Bui T., Zhou Y., Shepherd M., and Williams C.G., 2002. Conifer microsatellite handbook, Corporate Press
3. Raleigh, N.C. Austerlitz F., Mariette S., Machon N., Gouyon P.-H., and Godelle B., 2000. Effects of colonization processes on genetic diversity: differences between annual plants and tree species. Genetics 154: 1309-1321.
4. Dogra P.D., 1985. Conifers of India and their wild gene resources in relation to tree breeding. Ind. For. 111: 935-955.
5. Ellstrand N.C., 1992. Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 63: 77-86.
6. Excoffier L., Laval G., and Schneider S., 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.1: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis, evolutionary bioinformatics online.
7. Excoffier L., Smouse P.E., and Quattro J.M., 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitrochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
8. Felsenstein J., 1989. PHYLIP: phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5: 164-166.
9. Finkeldey R. and Hattemer H.H., 2007. Tropical forest genetics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
10. Goudet J., 2001. FSTAT: A program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (Version 2.9.3.2), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
11. Hamrick J.L., Godt M.J.W., and Sherman-Broyles S.L., 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New For. 6: 95-124.
12. Hedrick P.W., 2005. A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59: 1633-1638.
13. Hussain A., 1995. Untersuchungen zur genetischen Kontrolle von Isoenzym- Polymorphismen und zur genetischen Struktur von Pinus roxburghii SARG. Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Forestry Science at the Faculty of Forestry Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August university of Göttingen, Germany.
14. Jackson J.K., 1994. Manual of Afforestation in Nepal (Part II), Department of Forest Research and Forest Survey, Kathmandu, Nepal.
15. Langella O., 2002. Populations (Version 1.2.28), CNRS, France.
16. Liewlaksaneeyanawin C., Ritland C.E., El-Kassaby Y.A., and Ritland R., 2004. Single-copy, species-transferable microsatellite markers developed from loblolly pine ESTs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 361-369.
17. Mantel N.A., 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27: 209-220.
18. Mariette S., Chagné D., Lézier C., Pastuszka P., Raffin A., Plomion C., and Kremer A., 2001. Genetic diversity within and among Pinus pinaster populations: comparison between AFLP and microsatellite markers. Heredity 86: 469-479.
19. Marquardt P.E., Echt C.S., Epperson B.K., and Pubanz D.M., 2007. Genetic structure, diversity, and inbreeding of eastern white pine under different management conditions. Can J. For. Res. 37: 2652-2662.
20. McCauley D.E., 1995. The use of chloroplast DNA polymorphism in studies of gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 198-202.
21. Nason A., 2001. The new OECD scheme for the certification of forest reproductive material. Silvae Genet. 50: 177-280.
22. Navascués M. and Emerson B.C., 2007. Natural recovery of genetic diversity by gene flow in reforested areas of the endemic Canary Island pine, Pinus canariensis. For. Ecol. Manage. 244: 122-128.
23. Nei M., 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
24. Nei M., 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 283-292.
25. Nei M., 1975. Molecular population genetics and evolution. In: Neuberger A., Tatum E.L. (Eds.), Frontier of biology Vol. 40, American Elsevier, New York.
26. Pandey M., Gailing O., Leinemann L., and Finkeldey R., 2004. Molecular markers provide evidence for long-distance planting material transfer during plantation establishment of Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. in Nepal. Ann. For. Sci. 61: 603-606.
27. Peakall R. and Smouse P.E., 2005. Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6: 288-295.
28. Rohlf F.J., 1998. NTSYS-pc version 2.0. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, Exeter Software, Setauket, New York.
29. Rungis D., Berube Y., Zhang J., Ralph S., Ritland C.E., Ellis B.E., Douglas C., Bohlmann J., and Ritland K., 2004. Robust simple sequence repeats markers for spruce (Picea spp.) from expressed sequence tags. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 1283-1294.
30. Sharma K., Degen B., Wuehlisch G.V., and Singh N.B., 2002. Allozyme variation in eight natural populations of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. in India. Silvae Genet. 51: 246-253.
31. Siregar I.Z., 2000. Genetic aspects of the reproductive system of Pinus merkusii. Jungh. et de Vriese in Indonesia. Thesis for the degree of doctor of forestry science at the Faculty of Forestry Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Germany, Cuvillier Verlag Göttingen.
32. Stefenon V.M., Gailing O., and Finkeldey R., 2008. Genetic structure of plantations and the conservation of genetic resources of Brazilian pine (Araucaria angustifolia). For. Ecol. Manage. 255: 2718-2725.
33. Thomas B.R., Macdonald S.E., Hicks M., Adams D.L., and Hodgetts R.B., 1999. Effects of reforestation methods on genetic diversity of lodgepole pine: an assessment using microsatellite and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 793-801.
34. Vekemans X., 2002. AFLP-SURV version 1.0. Laboratoire de génétique et écologie végétale, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.
35. Vendramin G., Lelli L., Rossi P., andMorgante M., 1996. A set of primers for the amplification of 20 chloroplast microsatellites in Pinaceae. Mol. Ecol. 5: 595-598.
36. Wang X.-R. and Szmidt A.E., 2001. Molecular Markers in Population Genetics of Forest Trees. Scand. J. For. Res. 16: 199-220.
37. Weir B.S. and Cockerham C.C., 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
38. Weising K., Nybom H.,Wolff K., and Kahl G., 2005. DNA Fingerprinting in Plants. Principles, methods, and applications, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton.
39. Wright S., 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.
40. Yi W.Z. and Raven P.H., 1999. Flora of China, Vol.4, Science Press, St. Louis, Missouri Botanical Garden, Beijing.