Using bilingual parallel corpora for cross-lingual textual entailment

ACL-HLT 2011 - Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 1336-1345

  Mehdad, Yashar ^a   Negri, Matteo ^a   Federico, Marcello ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION; CROSS-LINGUAL; DATA SETS; INFERENCE MECHANISM; LEXICAL KNOWLEDGE; LEXICAL RELATIONS; MATCHING METHODS; PARALLEL CORPORA; PARALLEL DATA; TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; TEXT PROCESSING;

SOFTWARE AGENTS;

EID: 84858301854     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Collin F. Baker, Charles J. Fillmore, and John B. Lowe. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet project. Proceedings of COLING-ACL.
2. Colin Bannard and Chris Callison-Burch. 2005. Paraphrasing with Bilingual Parallel Corpora. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2005).
3. Roy Bar-haim, Jonathan Berant, Ido Dagan, Iddo Greental, Shachar Mirkin, Eyal Shnarch, and Idan Szpektor. 2008. Efficient semantic deduction and approximate matching over compact parse forests. Proceedings of the TAC 2008 Workshop on Textual Entailment.
4. Luisa Bentivogli, Peter Clark, Ido Dagan, Hoa Trang Dang, and Danilo Giampiccolo. 2010. The Sixth PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge. Proceedings of the the Text Analysis Conference (TAC 2010).
5. Timothy Chklovski and Patrick Pantel. 2004. Verbocean: Mining the web for fine-grained semantic verb relations. Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-04).
6. Ido Dagan and Oren Glickman. 2004. Probabilistic textual entailment: Generic applied modeling of language variability. Proceedings of the PASCAL Workshop of Learning Methods for Text Understanding and Mining.
7. Ido Dagan, Bill Dolan, Bernardo Magnini, and Dan Roth. 2009. Recognizing textual entailment: Rational, evaluation and approaches. Journal of Natural Language Engineering, Volume 15, Special Issue 04, pp i-xvii.
8. Michael Denkowski and Alon Lavie. 2010. Extending the METEOR Machine Translation Evaluation Metric to the Phrase Level. Proceedings of Human Language Technologies (HLT-NAACL 2010).
9. Georgiana Dinu and Rui Wang. 2009. Inference Rules and their Application to Recognizing Textual Entailment. Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL 2009).
10. Claudio Giuliano. 2007. jLSI a tool for latent semantic indexing. Software available at http://tcc.itc.it/research/textec/toolsresources/jLSI. html.
11. Lidija Iordanskaja, Richard Kittredge, and Alain Polgre. 1991. Lexical selection and paraphrase in a meaning text generation model. Natural Language Generation in Articial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics.
12. Thorsten Joachims. 1999. Making large-scale support vector machine learning practical.
13. Philipp Koehn, Franz Josef Och, and DanielMarcu 2003. Statistical Phrase-Based Translation. Proceedings of HLT/NAACL.
14. Philipp Koehn, Hieu Hoang, Alexandra Birch, Chris Callison-Burch, Marcello Federico, Nicola Bertoldi, Brooke Cowan, Wade Shen, Christine Moran, Richard Zens, Chris Dyer, Ondrej Bojar, Alexandra Constantin, and Evan Herbst. 2007. Moses: Open Source Toolkit for Statistical Machine Translation. Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
15. Milen Kouleykov and Bernardo Magnini. 2005. Tree edit distance for textual entailment. Proceedings of RALNP-2005, International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing.
16. Milen Kouylekov, Yashar Mehdad, and Matteo Negri. 2010. Mining Wikipedia for Large-Scale Repositories of Context-Sensitive Entailment Rules. Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2010).
17. Yashar Mehdad, Alessandro Moschitti and Fabio Massimo Zanzotto. 2010. Syntactic/semantic structures for textual entailment recognition. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL HLT 2010).
18. Dekang Lin and Patrick Pantel. 2001. DIRT - Discovery of Inference Rules from Text. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-01).
19. Kathleen R. McKeown, Regina Barzilay, David Evans, Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou, Judith L. Klavans, Ani Nenkova, Carl Sable, Barry Schiffman, and Sergey Sigelman. 2002. Tracking and summarizing news on a daily basis with Columbias Newsblaster. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference.
20. Yashar Mehdad, Matteo Negri, and Marcello Federico. 2010. Towards Cross-Lingual Textual Entailment. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL HLT 2010).
21. Dan Moldovan and Adrian Novischi. 2002. Lexical chains for question answering. Proceedings of COLING.
22. Matteo Negri and Yashar Mehdad. 2010. Creating a Bilingual Entailment Corpus through Translations with Mechanical Turk: $100 for a 10-day Rush. Proceedings of the NAACL 2010Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data With Amazons Mechanical Turk .
23. Franz Josef Och and Hermann Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Computational Linguistics, 29(1):1951.
24. Emanuele Pianta, Luisa Bentivogli, and Christian Girardi. 2002. MultiWordNet: Developing and Aligned Multilingual Database. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Global WordNet.
25. Vasile Rus, Art Graesser, and Kirtan Desai 2005. Lexico-Syntactic Subsumption for Textual Entailment. Proceedings of RANLP 2005.
26. Helmut Schmid 2005. Probabilistic Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Decision Trees. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing.
27. Marta Tatu andDan Moldovan. 2005. A semantic approach to recognizing textual entailment. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP 2005).
28. Matthew Snover, Nitin Madnani, Bonnie Dorr, and Richard Schwartz. 2009. Fluency, Adequacy, or HTER? Exploring Different Human Judgments with a Tunable MT Metric. Proceedings of WMT09.
29. Rui Wang and Yi Zhang,. 2009. Recognizing Textual Relatedness with Predicate-Argument Structures. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2009).
30. Kenji Yamada and Kevin Knight 2001. A Syntax-Based Statistical Translation Model. Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
31. Shiqi Zhao, Haifeng Wang, Ting Liu, and Sheng Li. 2009. Extracting Paraphrase Patterns from Bilingual Parallel Corpora. Journal of Natural Language Engineering, Volume 15, Special Issue 04, pp 503-526.