Erratum: Recognizing textual entailment: Rational, evaluation and approaches (Natural Language Engineering (2009) 15:4 (i-xvii) DOI: 10.1017/S1351324909990209);Recognizing textual entailment: Rational, evaluation and approaches

Natural Language Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 105-

  Dagan, Ido ^a   Dolan, Bill ^b   Magnini, Bernardo ^c   Roth, Dan ^d  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^c FONDAZIONE BRUNO KESSLER   (Italy)

^d University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

AUTOMATIC ACQUISITION; COMPETITIVE MEETINGS; INFERENCE METHODS; LEXICAL SEMANTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING; QUESTION ANSWERING; RECOGNIZING TEXTUAL ENTAILMENTS; TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 70449462156     PISSN: 13513249     EISSN: 14698110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1351324909990234     Document Type: Erratum

References (41)

1. Bacchus, F. 1990. Representing and Reasoning with Probabilistic Knowledge. Cambridge, MA, USA, MIT Press.
2. Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., and Lowe, J. B. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet project. In Proceedings of the COLING-ACL, Montreal, QC, Canada.
3. Bar-Haim, R., Dagan, I., Dolan, B., Ferro, L., Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B., and Szpektor, I. 2006. The second PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, Venice, Italy.
4. Bar-Haim, R., Dagan, I., Mirkin, S., Shnarch, E., Szpektor, I., Berant, J., and Greenthal, I. 17 November 2008. Efficient semantic deduction and approximate matching over compact parse forests. In Proceedings of the TAC 2008 Workshop on Textual Entailment, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
5. Bar-Haim, R., Szpektor, I., and Glickman, O. 2005. Definition and analysis of intermediate entailment levels. In ACL-05 Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
6. Bos, J., and Markert, K. 2006 When logical inference helps determining textual entailment (and when it doesnt). In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, Venice, Italy.
7. Cabrio, E., Kouylekov, M., and Magnini, B. 17 November 2008. Combining specialized entailment engines for RTE-4. In Proceedings of the TAC 2008 Workshop on Textual Entailment, Gaithersburg, MD.
8. Chambers, N., Cer, D., Grenager, T., Hall, D., Kiddon, C., MacCartney, B., de Marneffe, M.-C., Ramage, D., Yeh, E., and Christopher, D. M. 28-29 June 2007. Learning alignments and leveraging natural logic, In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, Prague, Czech Republic.
9. Chklovski, T., and Pantel, P. 2004. VerbOcean: Mining the web for fine-grained semantic verb relations. In Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-04), Barcelona, Spain.
10. Chierchia, G., and McConnell-Ginet, S. 2001. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Clark, P., Harrison, P., Thompson, J., Murray, W., Hobbs, J., and Fellbaum, C. 28-29 June 2007. On the role of lexical and world knowledge in RTE3. In Proceedings of the ACLPASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, Prague, Czech Republic.
12. Condoravdi, C., Crouch, D., de Paiva, V., Stolle, R., and Bobrow, D. G. 2003. Entailment, intensionality and text understanding. HLT-NAACL Workshop on Text Meaning, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
13. Dagan, I., Bar-Haim, R., Szpektor, I., Greental, I., and Shnarch, E. 17-23 February 2008. Natural language as the basis for meaning representation and inference. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing08), Haifa, Israel.
14. Dagan, I., and Glickman, O. 2004. Probabilistic textual entailment: generic applied modeling of language variability, In PASCAL Workshop on Learning Methods for Text Understanding and Mining, Grenoble, France.
15. Dagan, I., Glickman, O., and Magnini, B. 11-13 April 2005.: The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proceedings of the First PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, Southampton, UK.
16. Dagan, I., Glickman, O., and Magnini, B. 2006. The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In J. Quinonero-Candela, I. Dagan, B. Magnini, and F. d'Alch-Buc (eds.), Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty, Visual Object Classification, and Recognizing Textual Entailment, First Pascal Machine Learning Challenges Workshop, 2005, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 177-190, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol.3944, pp. 177-190. Springer-Verlag.
17. de Marneffe, M.-C. Rafferty, A. N., and Manning, C. D. 16-18 June 2008. Finding contradictions in text. In Proceedings of the ACL 2008: HLT, Columbus, OH.
18. de Salvo Braz, R., Girju, R., Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., and Sammons, M. 11-13 April 2005. An inference model for semantic entailment in natural language. In Proceedings of the First PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, Southampton, UK.
19. Fellbaum, C. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Garoufi, K. 2007. Towards a better understanding of applied textual entailment. Master Thesis. Saarbrucken, Germany: Saarland University.
21. Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B., Dagan, I., and Dolan, B. 28-29 June 2007 The third PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, Prague, Czech Republic.
22. Giampiccolo, D., Trang, D, Hoa, Bernardo, M., Dagan, I., and Cabrio, E. 17 November 2008. The fourth PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proceedings of the TAC 2008 Workshop on Textual Entailment. Gaithersburg, MD.
23. Glickman, O., Dagan, I., and Koppel, M. 2006. A lexical alignment model for probabilistic textual entailment. In J. Quinonero-Candela, I. Dagan, B.Magnini, and F. d'Alch-Buc (eds.), Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty, Visual Object Classification, and Recognizing Textual Entailment, First Pascal Machine Learning Challenges Workshop, MLCW 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3944, pp. 287-298, Springer-Verlag.
24. Halpern, J. Y. 1990. An analysis of first-order logics of probability. Artificial Intelligence 46: 311-350
25. Harabagiu, S., Hickl, A., and Lacatusu, F. 16-20 July 2006. Negation, contrast, and contradiction in text processing. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06), Boston, MA.
26. Iftene, A. 2009. Textual Entailment, PhD Thesis. Iasi, Romania: "Al. I. Cuza" University.
27. Keefe, R., and Smith, P. (ed.) 1997. Vagueness: A Reader. MIT Press.
28. Kipper Schuler, K. 2005. VerbNet: a broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon. Dissertations available from ProQuest. University of Pennsylvania, Paper AAI3179808.
29. Kouleykov, M., and Magnini, B. 2005. Tree edit sistance for textual entailment. In Proceedings of RALNP-2005, International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Borovets, Bulgaria, pp. 271-278
30. Kozareva, Z., and Montoyo, A. 2006. MLEnt: the machine learning entailment system of the University of Alicante. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, Venice, Italy.
31. Landis, J. R., and Koch, G. G. 1997. The measurements of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159-174
32. Lin, D., and Pantel, P. 2001 DIRT - Discovery of Inference Rules from Text. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-01), San Francisco, CA.
33. Monz, C., and de Rijke, M. 2001. Light-Weight entailment checking for computational semantics. In The Third Workshop on Inference in Computational Semantics (ICoS-3), Siena, Italy.
34. Szpektor, I., Tanev, H., Dagan, I., and Coppola, B. 2004. Scaling Web-based acquisition of entailment relations. In 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2004), Barcelona, Spain.
35. Tatu, M., and Moldovan, D. 28-29 June 2007. COGEX at RTE 3. In Proceedings of the ACLPASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, Prague: Czech Republic.
36. Vanderwende, L., and Dolan,W. B. 2006. What syntax can contribute in the entailment task. In J. Quinonero-Candela, I. Dagan, B. Magnini, and F. d'Alch-Buc (eds.), Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty, Visual Object Classification, and Recognizing Textual Entailment, First Pascal Machine Learning Challenges Workshop, MLCW 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol.3944, pp. 205-216 Springer-Verlag.
37. Vanderwende, L., Menezes, A., and Snow, R. 10 April 2006. Microsoft research at RTE-2: syntactic contributions in the entailment task: an implementation. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, Venice, Italy.
38. Voorhees, E. M., and Harman, D. 1999. Overview of the seventh text retrieval conference. In Proceedings of the Seventh Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-7), Gaithersburg, MD.
39. Wang, R., and Neumann, G. 17 November 2008. An accuracy-oriented divide-and-conquer strategy. In Proceedings of the TAC 2008 Workshop on Textual Entailment, Gaithersburg, MD.
40. Zaenen, A., Karttunen, L., and Crouch, R. 2005. Local textual inference: can it be defined or circumscribed? In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
41. Zanzotto, F. M., Pennacchiotti, M., and Moschitti, A. 28-29 June 2007. Shallow semantic in fast textual entailment rule learners. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, Prague, Czech Republic.