Inference rules and their application to recognizing textual entailment

EACL 2009 - 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 211-219

  Dinu, Georgiana ^a   Wang, Rui ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

INFERENCE RULES; ITS APPLICATIONS; LEXICAL RESOURCES; RECOGNIZING TEXTUAL ENTAILMENTS;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 77954584930     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1609067.1609090     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Roy Bar-Haim, Ido Dagan, Iddo Greental, Idan Szpektor, and Moshe Friedman. 2007. Semantic inference at the lexical-syntactic level for textual entailment recognition. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pages 131-136, Prague, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Regina Barzilay and Kathleen R. McKeown. 2001. Extracting paraphrases from a parallel corpus. In Proceedings of 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 50-57, Toulouse, France, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Roberto Basili, Diego De Cao, Paolo Marocco, and Marco Pennacchiotti. 2007. Learning selectional preferences for entailment or paraphrasing rules. In Proceedings of RANLP, Borovets, Bulgaria.
4. Peter Clark, Phil Harrison, John Thompson, William Murray, Jerry Hobbs, and Christiane Fellbaum. 2007. On the role of lexical and world knowledge in rte3. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pages 54-59, Prague, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. 2006. The pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3944, Springer, pages 177-190. Quionero-Candela, J.; Dagan, I.; Magnini, B.; d'Alch-Buc, F. Machine Learning Challenges.
6. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Anna N. Rafferty, and Christopher D. Manning. 2008. Finding contradictions in text. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 1039-1047, Columbus, Ohio, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini, Ido Dagan, and Bill Dolan. 2007. The third pascal recognizing textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pages 1-9, Prague, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Adrian Iftene and Alexandra Balahur-Dobrescu. 2007. Hypothesis transformation and semantic variability rules used in recognizing textual entailment. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pages 125-130, Prague, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Dekang Lin and Patrick Pantel. 2001. Dirt, discovery of inference rules from text. In KDD '01: Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 323-328, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
10. Dekang Lin. 1998. Dependency-based evaluation of minipar. In Proc. Workshop on the Evaluation of Parsing Systems, Granada.
11. Erwin Marsi, Emiel Krahmer, and Wauter Bosma. 2007. Dependency-based paraphrasing for recognizing textual entailment. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pages 83-88, Prague, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. Rowan Nairn, Cleo Condoravdi, and Lauri Karttunen. 2006. Computing relative polarity for textual inference. In Proceedings of ICoS-5 Inference in Computational Semantics, Buxton, UK.
13. Bo Pang, Kevin Knight, and Daniel Marcu. 2003. Syntax-based alignment of multiple translations: Extracting paraphrases and generating new sentences. In HLT-NAACL, pages 102-109.
14. Satoshi Sekine. 2005. Automatic paraphrase discovery based on context and keywords between NE pairs. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Paraphrase, pages 80-87, Jeju Island, Korea.
15. Idan Szpektor, Hristo Tanev, Ido Dagan, and Bonaventura Coppola. 2004. Scaling web-based acquisition of entailment relations. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 41-48.
16. Idan Szpektor, Eyal Shnarch, and Ido Dagan. 2007. Instance-based evaluation of entailment rule acquisition. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 456-463, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Idan Szpektor, Ido Dagan, Roy Bar-Haim, and Jacob Goldberger. 2008. Contextual preferences. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HIT, pages 683-691, Columbus, Ohio, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. Rui Wang and Günter Neumann. 2007. Recognizing textual entailment using sentence similarity based on dependency tree skeletons. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pages 36-41, Prague, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. Fabio Massimo Zanzotto and Alessandro Moschitti. 2006. Automatic learning of textual entailments with cross-pair similarities. In ACL-44: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 401-408, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.