Extracting paraphrase patterns from bilingual parallel corpora

Natural Language Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 503-526

  Zhao, Shiqi ^a   Wang, Haifeng ^b   Liu, Ting ^a   Li, Sheng ^a  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Toshiba China Co Ltd   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEATURE FUNCTION; INFERENCE RULES; LOGLINEAR MODEL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PARALLEL CORPORA; PATTERN PAIRS; WORD ALIGNMENT;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

EID: 76449092048     PISSN: 13513249     EISSN: 14698110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1351324909990155     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bannard, C., and Callison-Burch, C. 2005. Paraphrasing with bilingual parallel corpora. In Proceedings of ACL, pp. 597-604, Ann Arbor, MI.
2. Bar-Haim, R., Dagan, I., Greental, I., Szpektor, I., and Friedman, M. 2007. Semantic inference at the lexical-syntactic level for textual entailment recognition. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pp. 131-136, Prague, Czech Republic.
3. Barzilay, R. 2003. Information Fusion for Multidocument Summarization: Paraphrasing and Generation. Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University, New York.
4. Barzilay, R., and Lee, L. 2003. Learning to paraphrase: an unsupervised approach using multiple-sequence alignment. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, pp. 16-23, Edmonton, Canada.
5. Barzilay, R., and McKeown, K. R. 2001. Extracting paraphrases from a parallel corpus. In Proceedings of ACL. pp. 50-57 Toulouse, France.
6. Callison-Burch, C., Koehn, P., and Osborne, M. 2006. Improved statistical machine translation using paraphrases. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, pp. 17-24, New York.
7. Chambers, N., Cer, D., Grenager, T., Hall, D., Kiddon, C., MacCartney, B., de Marneffe, M., Ramage, D., Yeh, E., and Manning, C. D. 2007. Learning alignments and leveraging natural logics. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pp. 165-170, Prague, Czech Republic.
8. Clark, P., Murray, W. R., Thompson, J., Harrison, P., Hobbs, J., and Fellbaum, C. 2007. On the role of lexical and world knowledge in RTE3. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pp. 54-59, Prague, Czech Republic.
9. Hermjakob, U., Echihabi, A., and Marcu, D. 2002. Natural language based reformulation resource and web exploitation for question answering. In Proceedings of TREC, Gaithersburg, MD.
10. Ibrahim, A., Katz, B., and Lin, J. 2003. Extracting structural paraphrases from aligned monolingual corpora. In Proceedings of IWP, pp. 57-64, Sapporo, Japan.
11. Iftene, A., and Balahur-Dobrescu, A. 2007. Hypothesis transformation and semantic variability rules used in recognizing textual entailment. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pp. 125-130, Prague, Czech Republic.
12. Iordanskaja, L., Kittredge, R., and Polgùere, A. 1991. Lexical selection and paraphrase in a meaning-text generation model. In C. L. Paris, W. R. Swartout, and W. C. Mann (eds.), Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics, Kluwer, Norwell, MA, pp. 293-312.
13. Kauchak, D., and Barzilay, R. 2006. Paraphrasing for automatic evaluation. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, pp. 455-462, New York.
14. Koehn, P., Axelrod, A., Mayne, A. B., Callison-Burch, C., Osborne, M., and Talbot, D. 2005. Edinburgh system description for the 2005 IWSLT speech translation evaluation. In Proceedings of IWSLT, Pittsburgh, PA.
15. Koehn, P., Och, F. J., and Marcu, D. 2003. Statistical phrase-based translation. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, pp. 127-133, Edmonton, Canada.
16. Lepage, Y., and Denoual, E. 2005. Automatic generation of paraphrases to be used as translation references in objective evaluation measures of machine translation. In Proceedings of IWP, pp. 57-64, Jeju, Korea.
17. Lin, D., and Pantel, P. 2001. Discovery of inference rules for question answering. Natural Language Engineering 7(4): 343-360
18. Liu, T., Ma, J., Zhu, H., and Li, S. 2006. Dependency parsing based on dynamic local optimization. In Proceedings of CoNLL-X, pp. 211-215, New York.
19. Marsi, E., Krahmer, E., and Bosma, W. 2007. Dependency-based paraphrasing for recognizing textual entailment. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pp. 83-88, Prague, Czech Republic.
20. Mckeown, K. R., Barzilay, R., Evans, D., Hatzivassiloglou, V., Klavans, J. L., Nenkova, A., Sable, C., Schiffman, B., and Sigelman, S. 2002. Tracking and summarizing news on a daily basis with Columbia's newsblaster. In Proceedings of HLT, pp. 280-285, San Diego, CA.
21. Nivre, J., Hall, J., Nilsson, J., Chanev, A., Eryigit, G., Kubler, S., Marinov, S., and Marsi, E. 2007. MaltParser: a language-lndependent system for data-driven dependency parsing. Natural Language Engineering 13(2): 95-135.
22. Och, F., and Ney, H. 2000. Improved statistical alignment models. In Proceedings of ACL, pp. 440-447, Hong Kong, China.
23. Ouangraoua, A., Ferraro, P., Tichit, L., and Dulucq, S. 2007. Local similarity between quotiented ordered trees. Journal of Discrete Algorithms 5(1): 23-35.
24. Pang, B., Knight, K., and Marcu, D. 2003. Syntax-based alignment of multiple translations: extracting paraphrases and generating new sentences. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, pp. 181-188, Edmonton, Canada.
25. Pantel, P., Bhagat, R., Coppola, B., Chklovski, T., and Hovy, E. 2007. ISP: Learning inferential selectional preferences. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, pp. 564-571, Rochester, NY.
26. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P. 1992. Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 412- 420
27. Quirk, C., Brockett, C., and Dolan, W. 2004. Monolingual machine translation for paraphrase generation. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 142-149, Barcelona, Spain.
28. Ravichandran, D., and Hovy, E. 2002. Learning surface text patterns for a question answering system. In Proceedings of ACL, pp. 41-47, Philadelphia, PA.
29. Roth, D., and Sammons, M. 2007. Semantic and logical inference model for textual entailment. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pp. 107-112, Prague, Czech Republic.
30. Shinyama, Y., Sekine, S., and Sudo, K. 2002. Automatic paraphrase acquisition from news articles. In Proceedings of HLT, pp. 40-46 San Diego, CA.
31. Szpektor, I., and Dagan, I. 2007. Learning canonical forms of entailment rules. In Proceedings of RANLP, Borovets, Bulgaria.
32. Szpektor, I., Shnarch, E., and Dagan, I. 2007. Instance-based evaluation of entailment rule acquisition. In Proceedings of ACL, pp. 456-463, Prague, Czech Republic.
33. Szpektor, I., Tanev, H., Dagan, I., and Coppola, B. 2004. Scaling web-based acquisition of entailment relations. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 41-48, Barcelona, Spain.
34. Zhao, S.-Q., Wang, H.-F., Liu, T., and Li, S. 2008. Pivot approach for extracting paraphrase patterns from bilingual corpora. In Proceedings of ACL-08:HLT, pp. 780-788, Columbus, OH.
35. Zhao, S.-Q., Zhou, M., and Liu, T. 2007. Learning question paraphrases for QA from encarta logs. In Proceedings of IJCAI, pp. 1795-1800, Hyderabad, India.