Syntactic/semantic structures for textual entailment recognition

NAACL HLT 2010 - Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1020-1028

  Mehdad, Yashar ^a   Moschitti, Alessandro ^a   Zanzotto, Fabio Massimo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTS; HETEROGENEOUS RESOURCES; LEXICAL COMPOUNDS; LEXICAL SEMANTICS; RECOGNIZING TEXTUAL ENTAILMENTS; SEMANTIC RESOURCES; TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT; TRADITIONAL SYSTEMS; TREE KERNELS; WIKIPEDIA; WORDNET;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORESTRY; TEXT PROCESSING;

SEMANTICS;

COMPUTATION; EXPERIMENTATION; FORESTRY;

EID: 79959204960     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. E. Agirre, E. Alfonseca, K. Hall, J. Kravalova, M. Paşca, and A. Soroa. 2009. A study on similarity and relatedness using distributional and wordnet-based approaches. In NAACL '09: Proc. HLT/NAACL.
2. R. Bar-Haim, I. Dagan, B. Dolan, L. Ferro, D. Giampiccolo, and I. Magnini, B. Szpektor. 2006. The ii PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. In Proc. of the II PASCAL Challenges Workshop.
3. R. Bar-Haim, I. Dagan, I. Greental, and E. Shnarch. 2007. Semantic inference at the lexical-syntactic level. In AAAI'07: Proc. of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence.
4. R. Bar-Haim, J. Berant, and I. Dagan. 2009. A compact forest for scalable inference over entailment and paraphrase rules. In Proc. of EMNLP.
5. R. Basili, M. Cammisa, and A. Moschitti. 2005. Effective use of wordnet semantics via kernel-based learning. In CoNLL.
6. R. Basili, M. Cammisa, and A. Moschitti. 2006. A semantic kernel to classify texts with very few training examples. In Informatica.
7. S. Bloehdorn and A. Moschitti. 2007a. Combined syntactic and semantic kernels for text classification. In ECIR.
8. S. Bloehdorn and A. Moschitti. 2007b. Structure and semantics for expressive text kernels. In Proc. of CIKM '07.
9. S. Bloehdorn, R. Basili, M. Cammisa, and A. Moschitti. 2006. Semantic kernels for text classification based on topological measures of feature similarity. In Proc. of ICDM 06, Hong Kong, 2006.
10. J. Bos and K. Markert. 2005. Recognising textual entailment with logical inference. In HLT '05: Proc. of the conference on HLT and EMNLP.
11. A. Burchardt, N. Reiter, S. Thater, and A. Frank. 2007. Semantic Approach to Textual Entailment: System Evaluation and Task Analysis. In Proc. of the 3rd-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment, Prague.
12. Y. S. Chan and H. T. Ng. 2005. Word sense disambiguation with distribution estimation. In Proc. of IJCAI'05.
13. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proc. of the 1st NAACL conference.
14. M. Collins and N. Duffy. 2002. New ranking algorithms for parsing and tagging: kernels over discrete structures, and the voted perceptron. In Proc. of ACL '02.
15. N. Cristianini and R. Holloway. 2001. Latent semantic kernels.
16. G. Dinu and R. Wang. 2009. Inference rules and their application to recognizing textual entailment. In Proc. of the EACL '09.
17. D. Giampiccolo, B. Magnini, Ido Dagan, and B. Dolan. 2007. The third pascal recognizing textual entailment challenge. In Proc. of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing.
18. Claudio Giuliano. 2007. jLSI a for latent semantic indexing. http://tcc.itc.it/research/textec/toolsresources/jLSI.html.
19. A. D. Haghighi, A. Y. Ng, and C. D. Manning. 2005. Robust textual inference via graph matching. In HLT '05: Proc. of the conference on HLT and EMNLP.
20. David Haussler. 1999. Convolution kernels on discrete structures. Technical report.
21. J. J. Jiang and D. W. Conrath. 1997. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In Proc. of the 10th ROCLING.
22. Thorsten Joachims. 1999. Making large-scale support vector machine learning practical.
23. Landauer, Foltz, and Laham. 1998. Introduction to latent semantic analysis. In Discourse Processes 25.
24. D. Lin and P. Pantel. 2001. DIRT-discovery of inference rules from text. In Proc. of the ACM KDD-01.
25. R. Mihalcea, C. Corley, and C. Strapparava. 2006. Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity. In Proc. of AAAI06.
26. Alessandro Moschitti. 2006. Making tree kernels practical for natural language learning. In Proc. of EACL.
27. Peter Norvig. 1987. A unified theory of inference for text understanding. Technical report, USA.
28. Sebastian Padó, 2006. User's guide to sigf: Significance testing by approximate randomisation.
29. T. Pedersen, S. Patwardhan, and J. Michelizzi. 2004. Wordnet:: similarity - measuring the relatedness of concepts. In Proc. of 5th NAACL.
30. D. Roth and M. Sammons. 2007. Semantic and logical inference model for textual entailment. In Proc. of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing.
31. I. Szpektor and I. Dagan. 2008. Learning entailment rules for unary templates. In Proc. of COLING '08.
32. M. Tatu and D. Moldovan. 2005. A semantic approach to recognizing textual entailment. In HLT '05: Proc. of HLT/EMNLP.
33. Z. Wu and M. Palmer. 1994. Verb semantics and lexical selection. In Proc. of ACL.
34. Alexander Yeh. 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In Proc. of ACL 2000, Morristown, NJ, USA.
35. F. M. Zanzotto and A. Moschitti. 2006. Automatic learning of textual entailments with cross-pair similarities. In Proc. of ACL '06.
36. F. M. Zanzotto, M. Pennacchiotti, and A. Moschitti. 2009. A machine learning approach to textual entailment recognition. NATURAL LANGUAGE ENGINEERING.