Multimodality in multi-representational environments

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 715-731

  Arzarello, Ferdinando ^a   Robutti, Ornella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Communication Infrastructure; Handheld technology; Multi representation; Multimodality; Representational Infrastructure; Semiotic approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858219409     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-010-0288-z     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arcavi, A. (1994). Symbol sense: Informal sense making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics: an International Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 24-35.
2. Arzarello, F. (2008). Mathematical landscapes and their inhabitants: Perceptions, languages, theories. In M. Niss (Ed.), Proceedings of ICME10, Copenhagen, July 4-11 2004 (pp. 158-181). IMFUFA, Department of Science, Systems and Models, Roskilde University, Denmark.
3. Arzarello, F. (2009). New technologies in the classroom: Towards a semiotics analysis. In B. Sriraman & S. Goodchild (Eds.), Relatively and philosophically earnest: Festschrift in honor of Paul Ernest's 65th birthday (pp. 235-255). Chishing, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
4. Arzarello, F., & Edwards, L. (2005). Gesture and the construction of mathematical meaning. In Proceedings of PME XXIX, Melbourne, Vol. 1, pp. 122-145.
5. Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (1996). Mathematical discussion and perspective drawing in primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(1-2), 11-41.
6. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. A. Jones, R. A. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education, second revised edition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation. Understanding new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8. Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking. NY: Springer.
9. Chapman, O., & Robutti, O. (2008). Current problems and challenges in upper secondary mathematics education. In M. Niss (Ed.), Proceedings of ICME10, Copenhagen, July 4-11 2004 (pp. 514-518). IMFUFA, Department of Science, Systems and Models, Roskilde University, Denmark.
10. Douady, R. (1986). Jeux de cadres et dialectique outil-object. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 7(2), 5-31.
11. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 103-131.
12. Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455-479.
13. Hegedus, S. J., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2009). Intersecting representation and communication infrastructures. ZDM, 41(4), 399-412.
14. Kaput, J., Roschelle, J. (1998). The mathematics of change and variation from a millennial prespective: New content, new context. In C. Hoyles, C. Morgan & G. Woodhouse (Eds.), Rethinking the mathematics curriculum (pp. 155-170). London: Falmer Press.
15. Kaput, J., Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (2002). Developing new notations for a learnable mathematics in the computational era. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 51-75). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
16. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
17. Loncke, F. T., Campbell, J., England, A. M., & Haley, T. (2006). Multimodality: A basis for augmentative and alternative communication-psycholinguistic, cognitive, and clinical/educational aspects. Disability & Rehabilitation, 28(3), 169-174.
18. Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Three conjectures concerning the relationship between body activity and understanding mathematics. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceeding of PME 27, Honolulu, Hawaii, Vol. 1, pp. 103-135.
19. Radford, L. (2006). The anthropology of meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 39-65.
20. Robutti, O. (2006). Motion, technology, gesture in interpreting graphs. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 13(3), 117-126 (Digital Technologies in Mathematics Education: selected papers from ICTMT-7).
21. Robutti, O. (2010). Graphic calculators and connectivity software to be a community of mathematics practitioners. ZDM, 42, 77-89.
22. Sowder, J. T. (1992). Making sense of number in school mathematics. In G. Leinhardt, R. Putnam, & R. A. Hattrup (Eds.), Analysis of Arithmetic for mathematics teaching (pp. 1-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Tall, D. (1989). Concept images, generic organizers, computers and curriculum change. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(3), 37-42.
24. Trouche, L. (2004). Managing complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students' command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 281-307.
25. Verillion, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77-101.
26. Williamson, B. (2005). What are multimodality, multisemiotics and multiliteracies? http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications_reports_articles/web_articles/Web_Article532.
27. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636. http://ecl.ucsd.edu/EmbCog_Wilson.pdf.