Intersecting representation and communication infrastructures

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 399-412

  Hegedus, Stephen J ^a   Moreno Armella, Luis ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH   (United States)

^b DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858208915     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-009-0191-7     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abrahamson, A. L. (1998). An overview of teaching and learning research with classroom communication systems. Paper presented at the Samos international conference on the teaching of mathematics, Village of Pythagorion, Samos, Greece, July, 1998.
2. Abrahamson, A. L. (2000). A brief history of classtalk. Paper presented at the teachers teaching with technology international conference, Dallas, TX, March, 2000.
3. Abu-Hilal, M. (2000). A structural model for predicting mathematics achievement: Its relation with anxiety and self-concept in mathematics. Psychological Reports, 86(3), 835-847. doi: 10.2466/PR0.86.3.835-847.
4. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms, goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261.
5. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (Trans. C. Emerson & M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.
6. Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
9. Burke, K. A. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10. Burnstein, R., & Lederman, L. M. (2001). Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. The Physics Teacher, 39(8), 8-11. doi:10.1119/1.1343420.
11. Burrill, G., Allison, J., Breaux, G., Kastberg, S., Leatham, K., & Sanchez, W. (2002). Handheld graphing technology in secondary mathematics: Research findings and implications for classroom practice. Dallas, TX: Texas Instruments.
12. Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. The Physics Teacher, 69(9), 970-977.
13. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Davidson, A. (1999). Negotiating social differences: Youth's assessments of educators' strategies. Urban Education, 34, 338-369. doi:10.1177/0042085999343004.
15. Davidson, A., & Phelan, P. (1999). Students' multiple worlds: An anthropological approach to understanding students' engagement with school. In Advances in motivation and achievement: Role of context (Vol. 2, pp. 233-283). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
16. Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the human brain. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
17. Deci, E. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105-115. doi:10.1037/h0030644.
18. Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: The development of human consciousness. New York: Norton.
19. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P., & Wenk, L. (1996). Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7(2), 3-47. doi:10.1007/BF02948592.
20. Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Ellington, A. J. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students' achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(5), 433-463.
23. Gee, J. P. (1999). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis.
24. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74. doi:10.1119/1.18809.
26. Harter, S. (1992). The relationship between perceived competence, affect, and motivational orientation within the classroom: Process and patterns of change. In A. Boggiano & T. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and motivation: A social-developmental perspective (pp. 77-114). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hartline, F. (1997). Analysis of 1st semester of Classtalk use at McIntosh elementary school. Yorktown, VA: Better Education, Inc.
28. Hegedus, S., Dalton, S., Cambridge, L., & Davis, G. (2006). Patterns of participation in networked classrooms. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 257-264). Prague, Czech Republic: Program Committee.
29. Hegedus, S. J., & Kaput, J. (2003). The effect of SimCalc connected classrooms on students' algebraic thinking. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education held jointly with the 25th conference of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 47-54). Honolulu, Hawaii: College of Education, University of Hawaii.
30. Hegedus, S., Kaput, J., Dalton, S., Moniz, R., & Roschelle, J. (2007). SimCalc classroom connectivity project 2: Understanding classroom interactions among diverse, connected classrooms technology-Overview of the present finding of a 4-year study (2004-2008). Technical Report. Dartmouth, MA: University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, James J. Kaput Center for Research and Innovation in Mathematics Education.
31. Hegedus, S., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2008). Analyzing the impact of dynamic representations and classroom connectivity on participation, speech and learning. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom and culture (pp. 175-194). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
32. Hegedus, S., & Penuel, W. (2008). Studying new forms of participation and identity in mathematics classrooms with integrated communication and representational infrastructures. Special issue of Educational Studies in Mathematics: Democratizing Access to Mathematics Through Technology-Issues of Design and Implementation, 68(2), 171-183.
33. Hickey, D. (2003). Engaged participation versus marginal nonparticipation: A stridently sociocultural approach to achievement motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 103(4), 401-429. doi:10.1086/499733.
34. Honey, M., Kulp, K. M., & Carrigg, F. (2000). Perspectives on technology and education research: Lessons from the past and the present. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 5-14. doi:10.2190/7VV9-4G08-U0BX-REEJ.
35. Huffaker, D. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2003). The new sciences of learning: Active learning, metacognition, and transfer of knowledge in e-Learning applications. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 325-334. doi:10.2190/4T89-30W2-DHTM-RTQ2.
36. Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G., Jr. (2001). Students' attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74(4), 318-340. doi:10.2307/2673138.
37. Kaput, J. (1991). Notations and representations as mediators of constructive processes. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism and mathematics education (pp. 53-74). Boston: Reidel.
38. Kaput, J. (1994). Democratizing access to calculus: New routes using old routes. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 77-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Kaput, J. (2002). Implications of the shift from isolated, expensive technology to connected, inexpensive, diverse and ubiquitous technologies. In F. Hitt (Ed.), Representations and mathematical visualization (pp. 177-207). Mexico: Departmento de Matematica Educativa del Cinvestav-IPN.
40. Kaput, J., & Hegedus, S. (2002). Exploiting classroom connectivity by aggregating student constructions to create new learning opportunities. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 177-184). Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia.
41. Kaput, J., & Roschelle, J. (1998). The mathematics of change and variation from a millennial perspective: New content, new context. In C. Hoyles, C. Morgan, & G. Woodhouse (Eds.), Rethinking the mathematics curriculum (pp. 155-170). London: Springer-Verlag.
42. Linnenbrink, E., & Pintrich, P. (2000). Multiple pathways to learning and achievement: The role of goal orientation in fostering adaptive motivation, affect, and cognition. In C. Sansone & J. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 195-227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43. Littauer, R. (1972). Instructional implications of a low-cost electronic student response system. Educational Technology: Teacher and Technology Supplement, 12(10), 69-71.
44. Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (1990). On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45. Meece, J. (1991). The classroom context and student's motivational goals. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 261-285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
46. Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424-436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663. 85.3.424.
47. Moreno-Armella, L. & Hegedus, S. (2008). From static to dynamic mathematics: Historical and representational perspectives. Special issue of Educational Studies in Mathematics: Democratizing Access to Mathematics Through Technology-Issues of Design and Implementation, 68(2), 99-111.
48. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principle and standards for school mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
49. National Research Council. (2003). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students' motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
50. Newman, R., & Goldin, L. (1990). Children's reluctance to seek help with school work. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 92-100. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.92.
51. Newmann, F. M. (1992). (Ed.) Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
52. Penuel, W. R., & Wertsch, J. V. (1995). Dynamics of negation in the identity politics of cultural other and cultural self. Culture and Psychology, 1(3), 343-359. doi:10.1177/1354067X9513002.
53. Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Yu, H. (1998). Adolescents' worlds: Negotiating family peers, and school. New York: Teachers College Press.
54. Piazza, S. (2002). Peer instruction using an electronic response system in large lecture classes. Presentation document presented at the Pennsylvania State University, Center for Education Technology Services "Teaching with Technology" series: Departments of Kinesiology, Mechanical Engineering, and Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation.
55. Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
56. RAND. (2002). Mathematical proficiency for all students: Toward a strategic research and development program in mathematics education. RAND Mathematics Study Panel, Deborah Loewenberg Ball, Chair. A Report Prepared for the Office of Education Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education.
57. Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: Bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 7-30. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0901_3.
58. Roschelle, J., Abrahamson, L., & Penuel, B. (2003). Catalyst: Toward scientific studies of the pedagogical integration of learning theory and classroom networks. http://firefly.ctl.sri.com/wild/review.html.
59. Roschelle, J., & Gallagher, L. (2005). A research perspective on using graphing calculator interventions to improve mathematics achievement. SRI Report P11961.560, SRI International, CA.
60. Roschelle, J., Kaput, J., & Stroup, W. (2000). SimCalc: Accelerating students' engagement with the mathematics of change. In M. Jacobson & R. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 47-75). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Roschelle, J., Kaput, J., Stroup, W., & Kahn, T. (1998). Scalable integration of educational software: Exploring the promise of component architectures. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/98/6/.
62. Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Cognitive Technology, 1(1), 145-168. doi:10.1075/ijct.1.1.09ros.
63. Ryan, A., & Pintrich, P. (1997). "Should I ask for help?" The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents' help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 329-341. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.329.
64. Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.). (2000). Intrinsic motivation: Controversies and new directions. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
65. Shaffer, D. W., & Kaput, J. J. (1999). Mathematics and virtual culture: An evolutionary perspective on technology and mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 197-199. doi:10.1023/A:1003590914788.
66. Skinner, E., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571.
67. Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
68. Stroup, W. (2003). Understanding qualitative calculus: A structural synthesis of learning research. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(2), 167-215. doi:10.1023/A:1021147132127.
69. Turner, J., Thorpe, P., & Meyer, D. (1998). Students' reports of motivation and negative affect: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 758-771. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.758.
70. Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3-19. doi:10.1023/A:1009421303064.
71. Wilensky, U., & Stroup, W. (1999). Learning through participatory simulations: Network-based design for systems learning in classrooms. Paper presented at the computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL '99) conference. December 12-15, 1999, Stanford University.
72. Wilensky, U., & Stroup, W. (2000). Networked gridlock: Students enacting complex dynamic phenomena with the HubNet architecture. Proceedings of the fourth annual international conference of the learning sciences, Ann Arbor, MI, June 14-17, 2000.
73. Wortham, S. (2004). The interdependence of social identification and learning. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 715-749. doi:10.3102/00028312041003715.