The 'digital native' in context: Tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting

Oxford Review of Education

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 63-80

  Crook, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

computers; ICT; schooling; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858219179     PISSN: 03054985     EISSN: 14653915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2011.577946     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bennett, S. and Maton, K. 2010. Beyond the 'digital natives' debate: towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5): 321-331.
2. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. 2003. "Learning to work creatively with knowledge". In Powerful learning environments: unravelling basic components and dimensions, Edited by: De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N. and van Merriënboer, J. 55-68. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
3. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Casner-Lotto, J. and Barrington, L. 2006. Are they really ready to work? Employers' perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century U.S. workforce. The Conference Board Available online at: http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/FINAL_REPORT_PDF09-29-06.pdf (accessed 10 August, 2010)
5. Clark, A. 1997. Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Clark, W., Logan, K., Luckin, R., Mee, A. and Oliver, M. 2009. Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1): 56-69.
7. Collins, A. and Halverson, R. 2010. The second educational revolution: rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1): 18-27.
8. Confederation of British Industry (CBI). 2009. Future fit: preparing graduates for the world of work, London: Confederation of British Industry Higher Education Task Force.
9. Crook, C. K. 2008. Web 2.0 technologies for learning: the current landscape-opportunities, challenges and tensions, Coventry: Becta. Available online at: http://research.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/Web2.0_technologies_learning.pdf (accessed 3 March 2010)
10. Crook, C., Fisher, T., Graber, R., Harrison, C. and Lewin, C. 2008. Implementing Web 2.0 in secondary schools: impacts barriers and issues, Coventry: Becta. Available online at: http://research.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/Web2.0_benefits_barriers.pdf (accessed 3 March 2010)
11. de Jong, T. 2006. Computer simulations-technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312(5773): 532-533.
12. DfES. 2005. Harnessing technology, transforming learning and children's services Available online at: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/publications/e-strategy/ (accessed 30 January 2008)
13. Grant, L., Owen, M., Sayers, S. and Facer, K. 2006. Social software and learning. Opening Education Reports, Bristol: Futurelab. Available online at: http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/opening_education/Social_Software_report.pdf (accessed 24 November 2007)
14. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B. and Hughes, J. 2009. Web 2.0 and classroom research: what path should we take now?. Educational Researcher, 38(4): 246-259.
15. Horrigan, J. 2007. A typology of information and communication technology users, Washington DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available online at: http://www.pewInternet.org/Reports/2007/A-Typology-of-Information-and-Communication-Technology-Users.aspx (accessed 2 June 2010)
16. Jewitt, C. 2002. The move from page to screen: the multimodal reshaping of school English. Journal of Visual Communication, 1(2): 171-196.
17. Jones, C. and Healing, G. 2010. Net generation students: agency and choice and the new technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5): 344-356.
18. Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B. and Waycott, J. 2010. Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5): 332-343.
19. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1990. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Luckin, R., Logan, K., Clark, K., Graber, R., Oliver, M. and Mee, A. 2008. KS3 and KS4 learners' use of Web 2.0 technologies in and out of school, Coventry: Becta. Available online at: http://research.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/Web2.0_technologies_ks3_4_summary.pdf (accessed 3 March 2010)
21. Manovich, L. 2010. The language of new media, Cambridge: MIT Press.
22. Oliver, B. and Goerke, V. 2007. Australian undergraduates' use and ownership of emerging technologies: Implications and opportunities for creating engaging learning experiences for the Net Generation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2): 171-186.
23. Prenksy, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5): 1-6.
24. Rogoff, B. 2003. The cultural nature of human development, New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Schroeder, A., Minocha, S. and Schneider, C. 2010. The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(3): 159-174.
26. Sharples, M., Graber, R., Harrison, C. and Logan, K. 2009. E-Safety and Web 2.0.0 for children aged 11-16. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25: 70-84.
27. Tapscott, D. 2008. Grown up digital: how the net generation is changing your world, New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Tapscott, D. and Williams, A. D. 2006. Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything, New York: Portfolio.
29. Uricchio, W. 2004. "Cultural citizenship in the age of P2P networks:". In European culture and the media, Edited by: Bondebjerg, L. and Golding, P. 139-163. Bristol: Intellect Books.
30. Zhang, J. 2009. Toward a creative social web for learners and teachers. Educational Researcher, 38(4): 274-279.