The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 159-174

  Schroeder, A ^a   Minocha, S ^a   Schneider, C ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Case study based analysis; Collaborative learning; Social software; SWOT; Technology enabled education; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955412237     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00347.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson T. Teaching in an online learning context. Theory and Practice of Online Learning 2008, 343-366. Anderson TElloumi F. eds, Athabasca University, Edmonton, Canada
2. Benkler Y. Coase's penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. The Yale Law Journal 2002, 112:369-446.
3. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006, 3:77-101.
4. Brown G, Howe T, Ihbe M, Prakash A, Borders K. Social networks and context-aware spam. 2008, Paper presented at the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
5. Cain J. Online social networking issues within academia and pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2008, 72:1-7.
6. Chu M, Meulemans YN. The problems and potential of MySpace and facebook usage in academic libraries. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 2008, 13:69-85.
7. Dalsgaard C. Social software: e-learning beyond learning management systems. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning 2006, http://www.eurodl.org/index.php?article=228, Available at: (last accessed 18 January 2010
8. Day D, Lloyd MM. Affordances of online technologies: more than the properties of the technology. Australian Educational Computing 2007, 22:17-21.
9. Dennen VP. From message posting to learning dialogues: factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education 2005, 26:127-148.
10. Dennis AR, Kinney ST. Testing media richness theory in the new media: the effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research 1998, 9:256-274.
11. Dron J. Any color you like, as long as it's Blackboard. 2006, Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education
12. Du HS, Wagner C. Learning with weblogs: enhancing cognitive and social knowledge construction. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 2007, 50:1-16.
13. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of facebook 'friends': social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 2007, 12:1143-1168.
14. Garrison DR, Akyol Z. Role of instructional technology in the transformation of higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 2009, 21:19-30.
15. Garrison DR, Arbaugh JB. Researching the community of inquiry framework: review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education 2007, 10:157-172.
16. Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 1999, 2:87-105.
17. Gerhard J, Mayr P. Competing in the e-learning environment-strategies for universities. 2002, Paper presented at the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science
18. Gross R, Acquisti A. Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. 2005, Paper presented at the ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society, Alexandria, VA
19. Hagner PR, Schneebeck CA. Engaging the faculty. Technology Enhanced Teaching and Learning: Leading and Supporting the Transformation on Your Campus 2001, 1-12. Barone CA, Hagner PR. eds, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
20. Higdon J, Topaz C. Blogs and wikis as instructional tools. College Teaching 2009, 57:105-109.
21. Janssen R. Evaluation of the organization and financing of the Danish health care system. Health Policy 2002, 59:145-159.
22. Johnson SD, Aragon SR. An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 2003, 100:31-43.
23. Kieslinger B. How to Use Social Software in Higher Education. 2009, http://www.icamp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/icamp-handbook-web.pdf, On-line]. Available at: (last acessed
24. Kumar R, Novak J, Raghavan P, Tomkins A. Structure and evolution of blogspace. Communications of the ACM 2004, 47:35-39.
25. McLoughlin C, Lee M. Social software and participatory learning: pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. 2007, Paper presented at the Ascilite
26. Mann BL. Social networking websites - a concatenation of impersonation, denigration, sexual aggressive solicitation, cyber-bullying or happy slapping videos. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 2008, 17:252-267.
27. Miles MB, Huberman MA. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook 1994, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
28. Mottet TP, Martin MM, Myers SA. Relationships among perceived instructor verbal approach and avoidance relational strategies and students' motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education 2004, 53:116-122.
29. Parameswaran M, Whinston AB. Social computing: an overview. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2007, 19:762-780.
30. Pena-Shaff JB, Nicholls C. Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers and Education 2004, 42:243-265.
31. Romiszowski AJ. How's the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. Educational Technology 2004, 44:5-27.
32. Sabbaghi A, Vaidyanathan G. SWOT analysis and theory of constraint in information technology projects. Information Systems Education Journal 2004, 2:1-19.
33. Steffe L, Gale J. Constructivism in Education 1995, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ
34. Trentin G. Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2009, 25:43-55.
35. Yin RB. Case Study Research: Design and Methods 2008, 4th, edition, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA