Concurrent and longitudinal patterns and trends in performance on early numeracy curriculum-based measures in kindergarten through third grade

Assessment for Effective Intervention

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 95-106

  Missall, Kristen N ^a   Mercer, Sterett H ^b   Martínez, Rebecca S ^c   Casebeer, Dian ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Richland Bean Blossom Community School Corperation   (United States)

Author keywords

Curriculum based measurement; Early numeracy; Math

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858183192     PISSN: 15345084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1534508411430322     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baglici, S. P., Codding, R., & Tryon, G. (2010). Extending the research on the Tests of Early Numeracy: Longitudinal analyses over two school years. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 89-102. doi:10.1177/ 1534508409346053
2. Baldi, S., Jin, Y., Skemer, M., Green, P., Hergert, D., & Xie, H. (2007). Highlights from PISA 2006: Performance of the U.S. 15-year-old students in science and mathematics literacy in an international context. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
3. Chard, D. J., Clarke, B., Baker, S., Otterstedt, J., Braun, D., & Katz, R. (2005). Using measures of number sense to screen for difficulties in mathematics: Preliminary findings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 3-14. doi:10.1177/073724770503000202
4. Clarke, B., Baker, S., Smolkowski, K., & Chard, D. J. (2008). An analysis of early numeracy curriculum-based measurement: Examining the role of growth in student outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 46-57. doi:10.1177/0741932507309694
5. Clarke, B., & Shinn, M. R. (2004). A preliminary investigation into the identification and development of early mathematics curriculumbased measurement. School Psychology Review, 33, 234-248. (Pubitemid 39051388)
6. Clements, D. H. (2004). Major themes and recommendations. In D. H. Clements and J. Sarama (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 7-76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. Florence, KY: Routledge.
8. Cooper, H., Nye, B., Charlton, K., Lindsay, J., & Greathouse, S. (1996). The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 66, 227-268. doi:10.3102/00346543066003227
9. DiStefano, C., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2006). Investigating subtypes of child development: A comparison of cluster analysis and latent class cluster analysis in typology creation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 778-794. doi:10.1177/0013164405284033 (Pubitemid 44300879)
10. Duncan, G. J., Claessens, A., Huston, A. C., Pagani, L.S., Engel, M., Sexton, H., .Duckworth, K. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428-1446.
11. Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford.
12. Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007). Progress monitoring in mathematics: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 41, 121-139. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020101
13. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Hamlett, C. L. (2003). The potential for diagnostic analysis within curriculum-based measurement. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28, 13-22. doi:10.1177/073724770302800303
14. Gersten, R., & Chard, D. (1999) Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 3, 18-29. doi:10.1177/002246699903300102
15. Indiana Department of Education. (2010). 2010-2011 ISTEP+ program manual: Policies and procedures for Indiana's assessment system. Retrieved from http://www.doe.in.gov/assessment/docs/ProgramManual.pdf
16. Kaplan, D. (2008). An overview of Markov chain methods for the study of stage-sequential developmental processes. Developmental Psychology, 44, 457-467. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.457
17. Kidd, J. K., Pasnak, R., Gadzichowski, M., Ferral-Like, M., & Gallington, D. (2008). Enhancing early numeracy by promoting the abstract thought involved in the oddity principle, seriation and conservation. Journal of Advance Academics, 19, 164-200.
18. Lanza, S. T., Flaherty, B. P., & Collins, L. M. (2003). Latent class and latent transition analysis. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 663-685). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
19. Lee, J., Grigg, W., & Dion, G. (2007). The nation's report card: Mathematics 2007. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
20. Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, covariate effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 26-47. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1401-2
21. Martínez, R. S., Missall, K. M., Graney, S. B., K. Aricak, T., & Clarke, B. (2009). Technical adequacy of early numeracy curriculumbased measurement in kindergarten. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 116-125. doi:10.1177/1534508408326204
22. Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Thompson, R. E. (2005). Kindergarten predictors of math learning disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 142-155. doi:10.0000/j.1540- 5826.2005.00129.x (Pubitemid 41006906)
23. McKelvey, R. D., & Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4, 103-120. doi:10.1080/00222 50X.1975.9989847
24. Muthén, B. O. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. Marcoulides & R. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1-33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles CA: Author.
26. National Council for Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: Author.
27. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
28. Olson, J. F., Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2008). Trends in international mathematics and science study 2007 technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
29. Perie, M., Grigg, W., & Dion, G. (2005). The nation's report card: Mathematics 2005 (NCES 2006-453). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30. Shinn, M. R. (2004). Administration and scoring of Mathematics Computation Curriculum-Based Measurement (M-CBM) and math fact probes for use with AIMSweb. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation.
31. Thurber, R. S., Shinn, M. R., & Smoklowski, K. (2002). What is measured in mathematics tests? Construct validity of curriculum-based mathematics measures. School Psychology Review, 31, 498-513. (Pubitemid 36507756)
32. VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Burns, M. K. (2009). Performance indicators in math: Implications for brief experimental analysis of academic performance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 71-91. doi:10.1007/s10864-009-9081-x
33. Wagner, D., & Davis, B. (2010). Feeling number: Grounding number sense in a sense of quantity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74, 39-51. doi:10.1007/s10649-009-9226-9