What is measured in mathematics tests? Construct validity of curriculum-based mathematics measures

School Psychology Review

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 498-513

  Thurber, Robin Schul ^b   Shinn, Mark R ^a   Smolkowski, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036995521     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anrig, G. R., & LaPointe, A. E. (1989). What we know about what students don't know. Educational Leadership, 47(3), 4-9.
2. Beatty, L. S., Gardner, E. G., Madden, R., & Karlsen, B. (1985). The Stanford Diagnostic Mathematics Test (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
3. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
5. Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1997). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. CTB/McGraw-Hill.(1992).Califomia Achievement Tests, Fifth Edition. Monterey, CA: CTB Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
7. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
8. Deno, S. L. (1986). Formative evaluation of individual programs: Anew role for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 15, 358-374.
9. Deno, S. L., & Espin, C. A. (1991). Evaluation strategies for preventing and remediating basic skill deficits. In G. Stoner, M. R. Shinn, & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems (pp. 79-97). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
10. Fassinger, R. E. (1987). Use of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 425-436.
11. Freeman, D. J., Juhn, T. M., Porter, A. C., Floden, R. E., Schmidt, W. H., & Schwille, J. R. (1983). Do textbooks and tests define a national curriculum in elementary school mathematics? Elementary School Journal, 83, 501-513.
12. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199-208.
13. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45-58.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989). Effects of instrumental use of curriculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 43-52.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1990). The role of skills analysis in curriculum-based measurement in math. School Psychology Review, 19, 6-22.
16. Good, R. H., & Jefferson, G. (1998). Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advances in curriculum-based measurement (pp. 61-88). New York: Guilford Press.
17. Hallahan, D. P., Kaufman, J. M., & Lloyd, J. W. (1985). Introduction to learning disabilities. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. Howell, K. W., Fox, S. L., & Morehead, M. K. (1993). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19. Long, J. S. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
20. Marsh, H. W. (1995). χ2 and χ2 I2 fit indices for structural equation models: A brief note of clarification. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 246.
21. Marsh, H.W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
22. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford Press.
23. Messick, S. (1990). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 1012-1027.
24. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2001). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
25. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1992). NAEP 1992 mathematics report card for the nation and the states (Report No. 23-ST02). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
26. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1996). The pocket guide to the condition of education: 1996. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
27. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
28. Putnam, D. (1989). The criterion-related validity of CBM measures of math. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Oregon, Eugene.
29. Reese, C. M., Miller, K. E., Mazzeo, J., & Dossey, J. A. (1997). NAEP 1996 mathematics report card for the nation and the states. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
30. th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
32. Shinn, M.R. (Ed.). (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford.
33. Shinn, M. R. (2002). Use of curriculum-based measurement maze in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation, Inc.
34. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
35. Shinn, M. R., & Marston, D. (1985). Differentiating mildly handicapped, low-achieving, and regular education students: A curriculum-based approach. Remedial and Special Education, 6(2), 31-38.
36. Shinn, M. R., & McConnell, S. M. (1994). Improving general education instruction: Relevance to school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 23, 351-371.
37. Silbert, J., Carnine, D., & Stein, M. (1990). Direct instruction mathematics (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
38. Skiba, R., Magnusson, D., Marston, D., & Erickson, K. (1986). The assessment of mathematics performance in special education: Achievement tests, proficiency tests, or formative evaluation? Minneapolis: Special Services, Minneapolis Public Schools.
39. Stanovich, K. E. (1992). How to think straight about psychology. New York: Harper Collins.
40. Tindal, G., Marston, D., & Deno, S. (1983). The reliability of direct and repeated measurement (Research Report No. 109). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
41. U.S. Department of Education. (1997). Nineteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.