Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 679-686

  Liu, Yung Ching ^a   Jhuang, Jing Wun ^a  

^a NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Display; In vehicle warning information; Spatial compatibility

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY DEVICES; VEHICLES;

AUDITORY DISPLAY; DECISION PERFORMANCE; DIVIDED ATTENTION; DRIVING SIMULATOR STUDY; RESPONSE PERFORMANCE; SPATIAL COMPATIBILITY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; WARNING INFORMATIONS;

VEHICLE PERFORMANCE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY DISPLAY; CAR; CAR DRIVING; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; DISPLAY SYSTEM; DRIVER; DRIVING ABILITY; HUMAN; IN VEHICLE WARNING INFORMATION DISPLAY; INFORMATION SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; RATING SCALE; RESPONSE TIME; SIMULATION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISPLAY; VOLUNTEER;

EID: 84858071829     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Beruscha, F., Wang, L., Augsburg, K., Wandke, H., 2010. Do drivers steer toward or away from lateral directional vibrations at the steering wheel? In: Proc. 2nd European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, Berlin, Germany, April 2010, pp. 227-236.
2. Bronkhorst A.W., Veltman J.A., Van Breda L. Application of a three-dimensional auditory display in a flight task. Hum. Factors 1996, 38(1):23-33.
3. Chan W.H., Chan A.H.S. Movement compatibility for rotary control and circular display-computer simulated test and real hardware test. Appl. Ergon. 2003, 34(1):61-71.
4. Chan K.W.L., Chan A.H.S. Spatial S-R compatibility of visual and auditory signals: implications for human-machine interface design. Displays 2005, 26(3):109-119.
5. Chan K.W.L., Chan A.H.S. Spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility for foot controls with visual displays. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2009, 39:396-402.
6. Chan A.H.S., Chan K.W.L. Three-dimensional spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility for visual signals with hand and foot controls. Appl. Ergon. 2010, 41:840-848.
7. Chan A.H.S., Shum V.W.Y., Law H.W., Hui I.K. Precise effects of control position, indicator type, and scale side on human performance. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2003, 22:380-386.
8. Christensen C.A., Ivkovich D., Drake K.J. Late positive ERP peaks observed in stimulus-response compatibility tasks tested under speed-accuracy instructions. Psychophysiology 2001, 38(3):404-416.
9. Chua R., Weeks D.J., Ricker K.L., Poon P. Influence of operator orientation on relative organizational mapping and spatial compatibility. Ergonomics 2001, 44:751-765.
10. Collins D.J., Biever W.J., Dingus T.A., Neale V.L. Development of Human Factors Guidelines for Advanced Traveler Information Systems(ATIS) and Commercial Vehicle Operations(CVO): An Examination of Driver Performance under Reduced Visibility Conditions when Using an In-vehicle Signing and Information System (ISIS) 1999, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, (FHWA-RD- 99-130).
11. Deatherage B. Auditory and other sensory forms of information presentation. Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design (Rev. Ed.) 1972, 124. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, Table 4-1. H. Van Cott, R. Kinkade (Eds.).
12. Dingus T.A., McGehee D.V., Manakkal N., Jahns S.K., Carney C., Hankey J.M. Human factors field evaluation of automotive headway maintenance/collision warning devices. Hum. Factors 1997, 39(2):216-229.
13. Fitts P.M., Seeger C.M. S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. J. Exp. Psychol. 1953, 46:199-210.
14. Ghozlan A. Simon's experiments and stimulus-response compatibility: hypothesis of two automatic responses. Percept. Mot. Skills 1997, 84(1):35-45.
15. Green P., Levison W., Paelke G., Serafin C. Preliminary Human Factors Design Guidelines for Driver Information Systems 1995, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, Technical Report No. FHWA-RD-94-087.
16. Harder K.A., Bloomfield J., Chihak B.J. The Effectiveness of Auditory Side and Forward-collision Avoidance Warnings in Winter Driving Conditions 2003, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Final report. Technical Report No. MN/RC 2003-14.
17. Klauer S.G., Dingus T.A., Neale V.L., Sudweeks J.D., Ramsey D.J. The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-crash/crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data 2006, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, Technical Report DOT HS 810 594.
18. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: a model and taxonomy. Psychol. Rev. 1990, 97:253-270.
19. Kunde W. Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2001, 27:387-394.
20. Kunde W., Müsseler J., Heuer H. Spatial compatibility effects with tool use. Hum. Factors 2007, 49:661-670.
21. Lee F.C.H., Chan A.H.S. Attending visual and auditory signals: ergonomics recommendations with consideration of signal modality and spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2007, 37(3):197-206.
22. Logie R.H. Visuo-spatial Working Memory 1995, Erlbaum, Hove, UK.
23. Macdonald W.A., Hoffmann E.R. Review of relationships between steering wheel reversal rate and driving task demand. Hum. Factors 1980, 22(6):733-739.
24. Maltz M., Shinar D. Imperfect in-vehicle collision avoidance warning systems can aid drivers. Hum. Factors 2004, 46(2):357-366.
25. Nanthavanij S., Yenradee P. Predicting the optimum number, location, and signal sound level of auditory warning devices for manufacturing facilities. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 1999, 24(6):569-578.
26. Nomura, S., Utsunomiya, T., Tsuchinaga, M., Shiose, T., Kawakami, H., Katai, O., Yamanaka, K., 2007. Designing an aural user interface for enhancing spatial conceptualization. In: Proceedings of the Second IASTED International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 205-210), March 14-6, 2007, Chamonix, France.
27. Stimulus-response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective 1990, North-Holland, Amsterdam. R.W. Proctor, T.G. Reeve (Eds.).
28. Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L. Stimulus-response Compatibility: Data, Theory, and Applications 2006, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
29. Roswarski T.E., Proctor R.W. Auditory stimulus-response compatibility: is there a contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence. Psychol. Res. 2000, 63(2):148-158.
30. Sanders M.M., McCormick E.J. Human Factors in Engineering and Design 1993, McGraw-Hill, New York. seventh ed.
31. Simon J.R. The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. Stimulus-response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective 1990, 31-86. North-Holland, Amsterdam. R.W. Proctor, T.G. Reeve (Eds.).
32. Simon J.R., Rudell A.P. Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J. Appl. Psychol. 1967, 51(3):300-304.
33. Simon J.R., Small A.M. Processing auditory information: interference from an irrelevant cue. J. Appl. Psychol. 1969, 53(5):433-435.
34. Suetomi T., Niibe T. A human interface design of multiple collision warning system. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Human Factors in Driving Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design 2001, 14-17. Aspen, Colorado, August 14-17, 2001.
35. Suetomi, T., Kido, K., Yamamoto, Y., Hata, S., 1995. A study of collision warning system using a moving-base driving simulator. In: Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Intelligent Transport System, November 9-11, 1995, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 1807-1812.
36. Taiwan Ministry of Internal Affairs, 2009. Retrieved May 20, 2009, available from: http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/.
37. Takao H., Sakai K., Osufi J., Ishii H. Acoustic user interface (aui) for the auditory displays. Displays 2002, 23:65-73.
38. Vu K.-P.L., Proctor R.W. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2004, 57A:539-556.
39. Wang, D.D., Pick, D., Proctor, R., Ye, Y., 2007. Effect of a side collision avoidance signal in simulation driving with a navigation system, In: Proc. 4th Int. Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, pp. 206-211.