Influence of operator orientation on relative organizational mapping and spatial compatibility

Ergonomics

Volumn 44, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 751-765

  Chua, Romeo ^a   Weeks, Daniel J ^b   Ricker, Kathryn L ^c   Poon, Pauline ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Operator orientation; Organizational mapping; Spatial compatibility

Indexed keywords

EYE MOVEMENTS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; SPATIAL VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; VISION;

SPATIAL MAPPING;

ERGONOMICS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; VOLUNTEER;

CANADA; FEMALE; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MOVEMENT; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0035918875     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130117522     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Burgess-limerick, R., Abernethy, B. and Neal, R. J. 1991, A statistical problem in testing invariance of movement using the phase plane model, Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 301-303.
2. Byblow, W. D., Carson, R. G. and Goodman, D. 1994, Expressions of asymmetries and anchoring in bimanual coordination, Human Movement Science, 13, 3-28.
3. Byblow, W. D., Chua, R. and Goodman, D. 1995, Asymmetries in coupling dynamics of perception and action, Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 123-137.
4. Chapanis, A. and Lindenbaum, L. E. 1959, A reaction time study of four control-display linkages, Human Factors, 1, 1-7.
5. Chua, R. and Weeks, D. J. 1997, Dynamical explorations of compatibility in perception-action coupling, in B. Hommel and W. Prinz (eds), Theoretical Issues in Stimulus-Response Compatibility (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science), 373-398.
6. Dutta, A. and Proctor, R. W. 1992, Persistence of stimulus-response compatibility effects with extended practice, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 801-809.
7. Fitts, P. M. and Deninger, R. I. 1954, S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-491.
8. Fitts, P. M. and Posner, M. I. 1967, Human Performance (Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole).
9. Fitts, P. M. and Seeger, C. M. 1953, S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
10. Gopher, D., Karis, D. and Koenig, W. 1985, The representation of movement schemas in long-term memory: lessons from the acquisition of a transcription skill, Acta Psychologica, 60, 105-134.
11. Hanna, G. B., Shimi, S. M. and Cuschieri, A. 1998, Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display, Annas of Surgery, 4, 481-484.
12. Heister, G., Schroeder-Heister, P. and Ehrenstein, W. H. 1990, Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: evidence for a hierarchical model of spatial stimulus-respons compatibility, in R. W. Proctor and T. G. Reeve (eds), Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective (Amsterdam: North-Holland), 117-144.
13. Loveless, N. E. 1962, Direction-of-moticn stereotypes: a review, Ergonomics, 5, 357-383.
14. Mardia, K. V. 1972, Statistics of Directional Data (London: Academic Press).
15. Michaels, C. F. and Schilder, S. 1991, Stimulus-respons compatibilities between vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: the effects of hand position and posture, Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 342-348.
16. Newell, A. and Rosenbloom, P. S. 1981, Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice, in J. R. Anderson (ed.), Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), 1-55.
17. Proctor, R. W. and Reeve, T. G. (eds) 1990, Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
18. Proctor, R. W. and Van Zandt, T. 1994, Human Factors in Simple and Complex Systems (Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon).
19. Schmidt, R. C. and Turvey, M. T. 1994, Phase-entrainment dynamics of visual coupled rhythmic movements, Biological Cybernetics, 70, 369-376.
20. Schmidt, R. C., Carello, C. and Turvey, M. T. 1990, Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 227-247.
21. Smith, K. U. and Sussman, H. 1969, Cybernetic theory and analysis of motor learning and memory, in E. A. Bilodeau and I. McD. Bilodeau (eds), Principles of Skill Acquisition (New York: Academic Press), 103-139.
22. Wallace, R. J. 1971, S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360.
23. Weeks, D. J. and Procter, R. W. 1990, Salient features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 355-366.
24. Weeks, D. J., Proctor, R. W. and Beyak, B. 1995, Spatial coding processes in stimulus-response compatibilities between vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 367-383.
25. Welford, A. T. 1968, Fundamentals of Skill (London: Methuen).
26. Wimmers, R. H., Beek, P. J. and Van Wieringen, P. C. W. 1992, Phase transitions in rhythmic tracking movements: a case of unilateral coupling, Human Movement Science, 11, 217-226.
27. Worringham, C. J. and Beringer, D. B. 1989, Operator orientation and compatibility in visual-motor task performance, Ergonomics, 32, 387-399.