Movement compatibility for rotary control and circular display - Computer Simulated Test and real Hardware Test

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 61-71

  Chan, W H ^a   Chan, Alan H S ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Circular display; Hardware Test; Movement compatibility; Rotary knob; Stereotype reversibility

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HARDWARE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

MOVEMENT COMPATIBILITY;

ERGONOMICS;

ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERFORMANCE; RESPONSE TIME; STEREOTYPY;

EID: 0037211488     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00075-3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brebner J., Sandow B. The effect of scale side on population stereotype. Ergonomics. 19:1976;571-580.
2. Chan, A.H.S., Courtney, A.J., 1998. Color associations for Hong Kong Chinese. In: Ergonomics Practice and Its Theory, Proceedings of the Fifth Pan-Pacific Conferences on Occupational Ergonomics, 21-24 July 1998, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 298-302.
3. Chan A.H.S., Courtney A.J., So K.W.Y. Circular displays with thumbwheels. Hong Kong Chinese preferences Int. J. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Manuf. 10(4):2000;453-463.
4. Courtney A.J. Hong Kong Chinese direction-of-motion stereotypes. Ergonomics. 37:1994;417-426.
5. Courtney A.J. The effect of scale-side, indicator type, and control plane on direction-of-turn stereotypes for Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Ergonomics. 37:1994;865-877.
6. Courtney, A.J., Chan, A.H.S., 1998. Testing Hong Kong Stereotypes With A Questionnaire. In: Ergonomics Practice and Its Theory, Proceedings of the Fifth Pan-Pacific Conferences on Occupational Ergonomics, 21-24 July 1998, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 288-292.
7. Fitts P.M., Simon C.W. Some relations between stimulus patterns and performance in a continuous dual pursuit task. J. Exp. Psychol. 43:1952;428-438.
8. Graham N.E. Manual tracking on a horizontal sale and in the four quadrants of a circular scale. Br. J. Psychol. 43:1952;70-77.
9. Hoffmann, E.R., 1990a. Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes for horizontally moving displays. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 34th Annual Meeting, Countdown to the 21st Century, October 8-12, 1990, Orlando, Florida, USA. Proceedings: M.E. Wiklund (Ed.). Santa Monica, CA: HFES, pp. 457-461.
10. Hoffmann, E.R., 1990b. Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes of three-dimensional display/control arrangements. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 34th Annual Meeting, Countdown to the 21st Century, October 8-12, 1990, Orlando, Florida, USA. Proceedings: M.E. Wiklund (Ed.). Santa Monica, CA: HFES, pp. 462-466.
11. Hoffmann E.R. Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes - linear displays with rotary controls. Ergonomics. 40(2):1997;199-222.
12. Hoffmann, E., Brown, C., Morgan, S., 1992. Stereotypes for operation of water taps. In: Hoffmann, E., Evans, O. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia Inc., Melbourne, Australia, 2-4 December 1992. Ergonomics Society of Australia Inc., Downer, ACT, Australia, pp. 63-71.
13. Hotta A., Yoshioka M. Experiment on direction-of-motion stereotypes for indicator or figure control, Ergonomics International 88. Adams A.S., Hall R.R., McPhee B.J., Oxenburgh M.S. Proceedings of the 10 Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Sydney, Australia, 1-5 August 1988. 1988;154-156 Taylor & Francis, London.
14. Kruk, R.V., Runnings, D.W., Mckinnon, G.M., Lippay, A.L., 1985. Simulation fidelity: Is it real or is it virtual? Proceedings of the Human Factors Association of Canada, 18th Annual Meeting, Hull, Quebec, 27-28 September 1985, HFAC, Rexdale, Ont., pp. 115-118.
15. Loveless N.E. Display-control relationships on circular and linear scales. Br. J. Psychol. 47:1956;271-282.
16. Mital A., Ramanan S. Accuracy of check-reading dials. Eberts R.E., Eberts C.G. Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors II. 1985;North-Holland, Amsterdam.
17. Mital A., Ramanan S. Results of the simulation of a qualitative information display. Hum. Factors. 28(3):1986;341-346.
18. Petropoulos H., Brebner J. Stereotypes for direction-of-movement of rotary controls associated with linear displays. the effects of scale presence and position, of pointer direction, and distances between the control and the display Ergonomics. 24:1981;143-151.
19. Pulat B.M. Fundamentals of industrial ergonomics. Fabrycky W.J., Mize J.H. Selection and Design of Displays and Controls. 1992;235-277 Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
20. Ross S., Shepp B.E., Andrews T.G. Response preferences in display-control relationships. J. Appl. Psychol. 39:1955;425-428.
21. Sanders M.S., McCormick E.J. Human control of systems. Rogers C., Holton T. Human factors in engineering and design. 1993;301-334 McGraw-Hill Inc. Singapore.
22. Smith S.L. Exploring compatibility with words and pictures. Hum. Factors. 23(3):1981;305-515.
23. Warrick, M.J., 1947. Direction of Movement in the Use of Control Knobs to Position Visual Indicators. USAF AMC Rep. No. 694-4C.
24. Warrick, M.J., 1948. Direction of Motion Stereotypes in Positioning a Visual Indicator by Use of a Control Knob. II. Results From a Printed Test. USAF AMC Rep. No. MCREXD-694-19A.
25. Warrick, M.J., 1949. Effects of Motion Relationships on Speed of Positioning Visual Indicators by Rotary Control Knobs. USAF AMC Technical Report No. 581.
26. Warrick, M.J., Grether, W.F., 1948. The Effect of Pointer Alignment on the Check Reading of Engine Instrument Panels. USAF AMC Memo. Rep. No. MCREXD-694-172.