Spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility for foot controls with visual displays

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 396-402

  Chan, Ken W L ^a   Chan, Alan H S ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Compatibility; Control and display; Foot control; Spatial stimulus response

Indexed keywords

COMPATIBILITY; CONTROL AND DISPLAY; FOOT CONTROL; HAND CONTROLS; HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; IMPROVING EFFICIENCIES; LONGITUDINAL ORIENTATIONS; REACTION TIME; RELATIVE POSITIONS; SPATIAL STIMULUS-RESPONSE; SPATIAL STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITIES; VISUAL DISPLAYS; VISUAL SIGNALS;

ERGONOMICS; FACE RECOGNITION;

HUMAN REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERGONOMICS; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 59749105475     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Annett M. Handedness and Brain Asymmetry: The Right Shift Theory (2002), Taylor and Francis, New York
2. Augustyn C., and Peters M. On the relation between footedness and handedness. Perceptual and Motor Skills 63 (1986) 1115-1118
3. Bayerl J., Miller D., and Lewis S. Consistent layout of function keys and screen labels speeds user responses. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, Santa Monica (1988) 344-346
4. Brebner J.M.T., and Welford A.T. Introduction: An historical background sketch. In: Welford A.T. (Ed). Reaction Times (1980), Academic Press, New York 1-23
5. Chan K.W.L., and Chan A.H.S. Spatial S-R compatibility of visual and auditory signals: Implications for Human-Machine Interface Design. Displays 26 (2005) 109-119
6. Chan A.H.S., and Ng A.W.Y. Lateral foot movement times in sitting and standing postures. Perceptual and Motor Skills 106 (2008) 215-224
7. Chan K.W.L., Chan A.H.S., and Courtney A.J. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility in vertical dimension for Chinese: Implication for interface design. Proceedings of the 6th Pan-Pacific Conference on Occupational Ergonomics, Beijing (2001) 31-36
8. Chan A.H.S., Chan K.W.L., and Yu R.F. Auditory stimulus-response compatibility and control-display design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 8 6 (2007) 557-581
9. Chua R., Weeks D.J., Ricker K.L., and Poon P. Influence of operator orientation on relative organizational mapping and spatial compatibility. Ergonomics 44 (2001) 751-765
10. Coren S. The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 1 (1993) 1-3
11. Drury C.G. Application of Fitts' law to foot-pedal design. Human Factors 17 (1975) 368-373
12. Duncan L.R. Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization (1986), Oxford University Press, New York
13. Ehrenstein A., and Proctor R.W. Selecting mapping rules and responses in mixed compatibility four-choice tasks. Psychological Research 61 (1998) 231-248
14. Gabbard C., and Iteya M. Foot laterality in children, adolescents, and adults. Laterality 1 (1996) 199-205
15. Hoffmann E.R. A comparison of hand and foot movement times. Ergonomics 34 4 (1991) 397-406
16. Hsu S.H., and Peng Y. Control/display relationship of the four-burner stove: A reexamination. Human Factors 35 4 (1993) 745-749
17. Kroemer K.H.E. Foot operation of controls. Ergonomics 14 3 (1971) 333-361
18. Lee C.H., and Chan A.H.S. Ergonomic recommendation for optimum positions and warning foreperiod of auditory signals in human-machine interface. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems 6 1 (2007) 40-48
19. Mendenhall, W., Beaver, R.J., Beaver, M.B., 2006. Introduction to Probability and Statistics, second ed. Belmont, CA.
20. Morin R.E., and Grant D.A. Learning and performance on a key-pressing task as a function of the degree of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (1955) 39-47
21. Nicoletti R., and Umilta C. Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception and Psychophysics 35 4 (1984) 333-345
22. Nicoletti R., and Umilta C. Responding with hand and foot: The right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present. Perception & Psychophysics 38 3 (1985) 211-216
23. In: Proctor R.W., and Reeve T.G. (Eds). Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective (1990), North Holland, Amsterdam
24. Proctor R.W., and Vu K.-P.L. Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles (2006), Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL
25. Rubichi S., Vu K.-P.L., Nicoletti R., and Proctor R.W. Spatial coding in two dimensions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 2 (2006) 201-216
26. In: Sanders M.S., and McCormick E.J. (Eds). Human Factors in Engineering and Design. seventh ed. (1993), McGraw-Hill, Singapore
27. Simon J.R., and Rudell A.P. Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 51 (1967) 300-304
28. Simon J.R., Hinrichs J.V., and Craft J.L. Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 1 (1970) 97-102
29. Simonen R.L., Videman T., Battie M.C., and Gibbons L.E. Comparison of foot and hand reaction times among men: a methodologic study using simple and multiple-choice repeated measurements. Perceptual and Motor Skills 80 (1995) 1243-1249
30. Springer J., and Siebes C. Position controlled input device for handicapped: Experimental studies with a footmouse. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 17 (1996) 135-152
31. Umilta C., and Nicoletti R. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In: Proctor R.W., and Reeve T.G. (Eds). Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective (1990), North-Holland, Amsterdam 86-116