A neurally plausible Parallel Distributed Processing model of Event-Related Potential word reading data

Brain and Language

Volumn 120, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 271-281

  Laszlo, Sarah ^a   Plaut, David C ^b  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational modeling; Event Related Potentials; N400; Parallel Distributed Processing; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; INHIBITORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MENTAL TASK; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING MODEL; PHONETICS; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS MODEL; READING; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; READING; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 84858007831     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ackley D.H., Hinton G.E., Sejnowski T.J. A learning algorithm for Boltzmann machines. Cognitive Science 1985, 9:147-169.
2. Barber H.A., Kutas M. Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition. Brain Research Reviews 2007, 53:98-123.
3. Benado L.S. Separate activation of fast and slow inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in rat neocortex in vitro. The Journal of Physiology 1994, 476:203-215.
4. Coltheart M., Davelaar E., Jonasson J., Besner D. Access to the internal lexicon. Attention and performance IV 1977, 535-555. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Dornic (Ed.).
5. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological review 2001, 108:204-256.
6. Crick F., Asanuma C. Certain aspects of the anatomy and physiology of the cerebral cortex. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Psychological and biological models 1986, Vol. 2. MIT Press, Cambridge.
7. Deacon D., Dynowska A., Ritter W., Grose-Fifver J. Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: Implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:60-74.
8. Fabiani M., Gratton G., Federmeier K.D. Event-related brain potentials: Methods, theory, and application. Handbook of psychophysiology 2007, 85-119. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 3rd ed. J.T. Cacioppo, L. Tassinary, G. Berntson (Eds.).
9. Federmeier K.D., Wlotko E., De Ochoa-Dewald E., Kutas M. Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research 2007, 1146:75-84.
10. Forster K.I., Hector J. Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: The turple effect. Memory and Cognition 2002, 7:1106-1117.
11. Grainger J., Holcomb P.J. Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processions in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass 2009, 3:128-156.
12. Griffiths T.L., Chater N., Kemp C., Perfors A., Tenenbaum J.B. Probabilistic models of cognition: Exploring representations and inductive biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14:357-364.
13. Hagoort P., Baggio G., Willems R.M. Semantic unification. The cognitive neurosciences 2009, 819-836. MIT Press, Boston. 4th ed. M. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
14. Hagoort P., Brown C.M., Swaab T.Y. Lexical-semantic event-related potential effects in patients with left hemisphere lesions and aphasia, and patients with right hemisphere lesions without aphasia. Brain 1996, 119:627-649.
15. Halgren E., Dhond R.P., Christensen N., Van Petten C., Marinkovic K., Lewine J.D., et al. N400-like magnetoencephalography responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences. Neuroimage 2002, 17:1101-1116.
16. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review 2004, 111:662-720.
17. Hinton G.E. Connectionist learning procedures. Artificial Intelligence 1989, 40:185-234.
18. Kounios J., Holcomb P.J. Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:804-823.
19. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology 2011, 62:621-647.
20. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology 1980, 11:99-116.
21. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory and Cognition 1983, 11:539-550.
22. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1984, 207:203-205.
23. Laszlo, S., & Plaut, D. C. (2011). Simulating event-related potential reading data in a neurally plausible parallel distributed processing model. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the cognitive science society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
24. Laszlo, S., Stites, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (in press). Won't get fooled again: An event-related potential study of task and repetition effects on the semantic processing of items without semantics. Language and Cognitive Processes.
25. Laszlo S., Federmeier K.D. Better the DVL you know: Acronyms reveal the contribution of familiarity to single word reading. Psychological Science 2007, 18:122-126.
26. Laszlo S., Federmeier K.D. Minding the PS, queues, and PXQs: Uniformity of semantic processing across multiple stimulus types. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:458-466.
27. Laszlo S., Federmeier K.D. A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language 2009, 61:326-338.
28. Laszlo S., Federmeier K.D. The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:176-186.
29. Laszlo St., Stites M., Federmeier K.D. Task and repetition effects on the semantic processing of items without semantics. Psychophysiology 2010, 47(1):S28.
30. McCarthy G., Nobre A.C., Bentin S., Spencer D.D. Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: I. Intracranial distribution and neural generators. Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15:1080-1089.
31. Nobre A.C., McCarthy G. Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming. Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15:1990-1998.
32. O'Reilly, R. C. (1996a). The Leabra model of neural interactions and learning in the neocortex. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
33. O'Reilly R.C. Biologically plausible error-driven learning using local activation differences: The generalized recirculation algorithm. Neural Computation 1996, 8:895-938.
34. Perry C., Ziegler J.C., Zorzi M. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review 2007, 114:273-315.
35. Plaut D.C., Booth J.R. Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review 2000, 107:786-823.
36. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 1996, 103:56-115.
37. Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E., Williams R.J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 1986, 323:533-536.
38. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 1989, 96:523-568.
39. Traub R.D., Miles R., Wong R.K. Model of the origin of rhythmic population oscillations in the hippocampal slice. Science 1989, 243:1319-1325.
40. Tse C.-Y., Lee C.-L., Sullivan J., Garnsey S.M., Dell G.S., Fabiani M., et al. Imaging cortical dynamics of language processing with the event-related optical signal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104:17157-17161.
41. van Berkum J.J.A. Understanding sentences in context: What brain waves can tell us. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008, 17:376-380.
42. van Berkum J.J.A., Hagoort P., Brown C.M. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11:657-671.
43. West W.C., Holcomb P.J. Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:1024-1037.
44. White E.L. Cortical circuits: Synaptic organization of the cerebral cortex, structure, function, and theory 1989, Birkhauser, Boston.
45. Xie X., Seung H.S. Equivalence of backpropagation and contrastive Hebbian learning in a layered network. Neural Computation 2003, 15:441-454.