Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: The turple effect

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 1106-1117

  Forster, Kenneth I ^a,b   Hector, Jo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0036816918     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194328     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 802-814.
2. Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 234-254.
3. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
4. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80 (3, Pt. 2), 1-46.
5. Bourassa, D. C., & Besner, D. (1998). When do nonwords activate semantics? Implications for models of visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26, 61-74.
6. Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 857-871.
7. Chambers, S. M. (1976). The Use of Visual Stimulus Information in Word Recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Monash University, Melbourne.
8. Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1972). How to make a language user. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of Memory (pp. 309-351). New York: Academic Press.
9. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance IV (pp. 535-555). New York: Academic Press.
10. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
11. Forster, K. I. (1999). The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain & Language, 68, 5-15.
12. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 680-698.
13. Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 696-713.
14. Forster, K. I., & Veres, C. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Formpriming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 498-514.
15. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
16. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 189-195.
17. Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 191-198.
18. Johnson, N. F., & Pugh, K. R. (1994). A cohort model of visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 240-346.
19. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational Analysis of Presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
20. McRae, K., & Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 558-572.
21. Monsell, S., Doyle, C., & Haggard, P. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43-71.
22. Norris, D. (1986). Word recognition: Context effects without priming. Cognition, 22, 93-136.
23. Paap, K., Newsome, S., McDonald, J., & Schvaneveldt, R. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
24. Perea, M., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Chology: Human Perception & Performance. 24, 767-779.
25. Plaut, D. C. (1997). Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language & Cognitive Processes. 12, 765-805.
26. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
27. Sears, C., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 876-900.
28. Sears, C., Lupker, S. J., & Hino, Y. (1999). Orthographic neighborhood effects in perceptual identification and semantic categorization tasks: A test of the multiple read-out model. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1537-1554.
29. Ziegler, J. C., & Perry, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68, B53-B62.