Minding the PS, queues, and PXQs: Uniformity of semantic processing across multiple stimulus types

Psychophysiology

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 458-466

  Laszlo, Sarah ^a   Federmeier, Kara D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related potentials (ERPs); N400; Semantic access; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SEMANTICS; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS;

EID: 41849098163     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00636.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bastuji, H., Perrin, F. Garcia-Larrea, L. (2002). Semantic analysis of auditory input during sleep: Studies with event related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 46, 242 255.
2. Bobes, M. A., Valdés-Sosa, M. Olivares, E. (1994). An ERP study of expectancy violation in face perception. Brain and Cognition, 26, 1 22.
3. Brown, C. Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 34 44.
4. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204 256.
5. Cornelissen, P., Tarkiainen, A., Helenius, P. Salmelin, R. (2003). Cortical effects of shifting letter position in letter strings of varying length. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 731 746.
6. Dale, A. M. (1994). Source localization and spatial discriminant analysis of event-related potentials: Linear approaches. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. La Jolla, CA: University of California San Diego.
7. Deacon, D., Dynowska, A., Ritter, W. Grose-Fifer, J. (2004). Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: Implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology, 41, 60 74.
8. Deacon, D., Hewitt, S., Yang, C. Masanouri, N. (2000). Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: Evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 137 146.
9. Dejerine, J. (1891). Sur un cas de cecite verbale avec agraphie, suivi 'autopsie [On a case of word blindness with agraphia, follow-up autopsy.]. Mémoires de la Société Biologique, 3, 197 201.
10. Ganis, G., Kutas, M. Sereno, M. I. (1996). The search for "common sense": An electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 89 106.
11. Harm, M. W. Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662 720.
12. Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J. O'Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 938 950.
13. Holcomb, P. J. Neville, H. J. (1990). Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 281 312.
14. Kelly, S. D., Kravitz, C. Hopkins, M. (2004). Neural correlates of bimodal speech and gesture comprehension. Brain and Language, 89, 253 260.
15. Kuçera, H. Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
16. Kutas, M. Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehnsion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463 470.
17. Kutas, M. Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11, 99 116.
18. Kutas, M. Hillyard, S. A. (1983). Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory and Cognition, 11, 539 550.
19. Laszlo, S. Federmeier, K. D. (2004). Acronym knowledge in University of Illinois undergraduates: The Acronym Information Database (AID). Unpublished manuscript.
20. Laszlo, S. Federmeier, K. D. (2007a). The acronym superiority effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 1158 1163.
21. Laszlo, S. Federmeier, K. D. (2007b). Better the DVL you know: Acronyms reveal the contribution of familiarity to single word reading. Psychological Science, 18, 122 126.
22. Marinkovic, K., Dhond, R. P., Dale, A. M., Glessner, M., Carr, V. Halgren, E. (2003). Spatiotemporal dynamics of modality-specific and supramodal word processing. Neuron, 38, 487 497.
23. McClelland, J. L. Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375 407.
24. Misra, M. Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Event-related potential indices of masked repetition priming. Psychophysiology, 40, 115 130.
25. Nobre, A. C., Allison, T. McCarthy, G. (2002). Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe. Nature, 372, 260 263.
26. Olichney, J. M., Van Petten, C., Paller, K. A., Salmon, D. P., Iragui, V. J. Kutas, M. (2000). Word repetition in amnesia: Electrophysiological measures of impaired and spared memory. Brain, 123, 1948 1963.
27. Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C. McCarthy, G. (1996). Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letterstrings, and textures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5205 5215.
28. Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., et al 2000). Functional neuroimaging studies of reading and reading disability (developmental dyslexia). Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 6, 207 213.
29. Rugg, M. D. Nagy, M. E. (1987). Lexical contribution to nonword-repetition effects: Evidence from event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 15, 473 481.
30. Rumelhart, D. E. McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60 94.
31. Schendan, H. E., Ganis, G. Kutas, M. (1998). Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. Psychophysiology, 35, 240 251.
32. Stuss, D., Picton, T. Cerri, M. (1988). Electrophysiological manifestations of typicality judgment. Brain & Language, 33, 260 272.
33. Tarkiainen, A., Cornelissen, P. L. Salmelin, R. (2002). Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letter-string perception. Brain, 125, 1125 1136.
34. Van Petten, C. Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18, 380 393.
35. Van Petten, C., Kutas, M., Kluender, R., Mitchiner, M. McIsaac, H. (1991). Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 131 150.
36. Van Petten, C. Rheinfelder, H. (1995). Conceptual relationships between spoken words and environmental sounds: Event-related brain potential measures. Neuropsychologia, 33, 485 508.
37. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C. Coltheart, M. (2000). The DRC model of visual word recognition and reading aloud: An extension to German. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 413 430.