Spatial dependence of phenotype-environment associations for tadpoles in natural ponds

Evolutionary Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 915-932

  Michel, Matt J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive divergence; Environmental heterogeneity; GIS; Hierarchical linear model; Phenotypic plasticity; Spatial autocorrelation

Indexed keywords

LITHOBATES; RANA SYLVATICA;

EID: 84857942590     PISSN: 02697653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-010-9441-y     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alford RA (1986) Habitat use and positional behavior of anuran larvae in a northern Florida temporary pond. Copeia 1986:408-423
2. Anselin L (2003) GeoDa 0.9 User's guide. Spatial analysis laboratory. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL
3. Berven KA, Grudzien TA (1990) Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica), implications for genetic population structure. Evolution 44:2047-2056
4. Bonacci A, Brunelli E, Sperone E et al (2008) The oral apparatus of tadpoles of Rana dalmatina, Bombina variegate, Bufo bufo, and Bufo viridis (Anura). Zool Anz 247:47-54
5. Brodie ED Jr, Ridenhour BJ, Brodie ED III (2002) The evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: hotspots and coldspots in the geographic mosaic of coevolution between garter snakes and newts. Evolution 56:2067-2082
6. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW (1992) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
7. Conover DO, Clakre LM, Munch SB et al (2006) Spatial and temporal scales of adaptive divergence in marine fishes and the implications for conservation. J Fish Biol 69:SC21-SC47
8. Crosby MK, Licht LE, Fu J (2009) The effect of habitat fragmentation on finescale population structure of wood frogs (Rana sylvatica). Conserv Genet 10:1707-1718
9. Cushman SA, McGarigal K (2002) Hierarchical, multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships. Landscape Ecol 17:637-646
10. Day T, Pritchard J, Schluter D (1994) A comparison of two sticklebacks. Evolution 48:1723-1734
11. Dayton GH, Saenz D, Baum KA et al (2005) Body shape, burst speed and escape behavior of larval anurans. Oikos 111:582-591
12. Dudley SA, Schmitt J (1996) Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: density-dependent selection on manipulated stem length in Impatiens capensis. Am Nat 147:445-465
13. Ernande B, Dieckmann U (2004) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in spatially structured environments: implications of intraspecific competition, plasticity costs and environmental characteristics. J Evol Biol 17:613-628
14. Fortin M-J, Dale M (2005) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
15. Fridley JD, Stachowicz JJ, Naeem S et al (2007) The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology 88:3-17
16. Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
17. Juenger T, Bergelson J (2002) The spatial scale of genotype by environment interaction (GEI) for fitness in the loose-flowered gilia, Ipomopsis laxiflora (Polemoniaceae). Int J Plant Sci 163:613-618
18. Keeley ER, Parkinson EA, Taylor EB (2005) Ecotypic differentiation of native rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) populations from British Columbia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:1523-1539
19. Keeley ER, Parkinson EA, Taylor EB (2007) The origins of ecotypic variation of rainbow trout: a test of environmental vs. genetically based differences in morphology. J Evol Biol 20:725-736
20. Kerfoot JR Jr, Schaefer JF (2006) Ecomorphology and habitat utilization of Cottus species. Environ Biol Fishes 76:1-13
21. Kirschel ANG, Blumstein DT, Smith TB (2009) Character displacement of song and morphology in African tinkerbirds. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:8256-8261
22. Langerhans RB, Chapman LJ, DeWitt TJ (2007) Complex phenotype-environment associations revealed in an East African cyprinid. J Evol Biol 20:1171-1181
23. Lardner B (1998) Plasticity of fixed adaptive traits? Strategies for predation avoidance in Rana arvalis tadpoles. Oecologia 117:119-126
24. Leimar O, Hammerstein P, Van Dooren TJM (2006) A new perspective on developmental plasticity and the principles of adaptive morph determination. Am Nat 167:367-376
25. Lind MI, Johansson F (2007) The degree of adaptive phenotypic plasticity is correlated with the spatial environmental heterogeneity experienced by island populations of Rana temporaria. J Evol Biol 20:1288-1297
26. Losos JB (1990) Ecomorphology, performance capability, and scaling of West Indian Anolis lizards: an evolutionary analysis. Ecol Monogr 60:369-388
27. Losos JB, Creer DA, Glossip D et al (2000) Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in the hindlimb of the lizard Anolis sagrei. Evolution 54:301-305
28. McIntyre PB, Baldwin S, Flecker AS (2004) Effects of behavioral and morphological plasticity on risk of predation in a Neotropical tadpole. Oecologia 141:130-138
29. McMahon SM, Diez JM (2007) Scales of association: hierarchical linear models and the measurement of ecological systems. Ecol Lett 10:437-452
30. Moran NA (1992) The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. Am Nat 139:971-989
31. Mullins ML, Pierce BA, Gutzwiller KJ (2004) Assessment of quantitative enclosure sampling of larval amphibians. J Herpetol 38:166-172
32. Proulx R, Magnan P (2004) Contribution of phenotypic plasticity and heredity to the trophic polymorphism of lacustrine brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis M.). Evol Ecol Res 6:503-522
33. Relyea RA (2000) Trait-mediated indirect effects in larval anurans: reversing competition with the threat of predation. Ecology 81:2278-2289
34. Relyea RA (2001) The lasting effects of adaptive plasticity: predator-induced tadpoles become long-legged frogs. Ecology 82:1947-1955
35. Relyea RA (2002) Competitor-induced plasticity in tadpoles: consequences, cues, and connections to predator-induced plasticity. Ecol Monogr 72:523-540
36. Relyea RA (2003a) Predators come and predators go: the reversibility of predator-induced traits. Ecology 84:1840-1848
37. Relyea RA (2003b) How prey respond to combined predators: a review and an empirical test. Ecology 84:1827-1839
38. Relyea RA (2004) Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85:172-179
39. Relyea RA, Auld JR (2004) Having the guts to compete: how intestinal plasticity explains costs of inducible defenses. Ecol Lett 7:869-875
40. Relyea RA, Auld JR (2005) Predator- and competitor-induced plasticity: how changes in foraging morphology affect phenotypic trade-offs. Ecology 86:1723-1729
41. Robinson BW, Parsons KJ (2002) Changing times, spaces, and faces: tests and implications of adaptive morphological plasticity in the fishes of northern postglacial lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1819-1833
42. Scheiner SM (1998) The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. VII. Evolution in a spatially-structured environment. J Evol Biol 11:303-320
43. Schlichting CD (2004) The role of phenotypic plasticity in diversification. In: DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM (eds) Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford University Press, New York, p 191
44. Schoeppner NM, Relyea RA (2008) Detecting small environmental differences: risk-response curves for predator-induced behavior and morphology. Oecologia 154:743-754
45. Sultan SE, Spencer HG (2002) Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am Nat 160:271-283
46. Svensson EI, Sinervo B (2004) Spatial scale and temporal component of selection in side-blotched lizards. Am Nat 163:726-734
47. Talley TS (2007) Which spatial heterogeneity framework? Consequences for conclusions about patchy population distributions. Ecology 88:1476-1489
48. Teplitsky C, Plenet S, Léna J-P et al (2005) Escape behaviour and ultimate causes of specific induced defences in an anuran tadpole. J Evol Biol 18:180-190
49. Thompson JN (1999) Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. Am Nat 153:S1-S13
50. Van Buskirk J (2005) Local and landscape influence on amphibian occurrence and abundance. Ecology 86:1936-1947
51. Van Buskirk J (2009a) Natural variation in morphology of larval amphibians: Phenotypic plasticity in nature? Ecol Monogr 79:681-705
52. Van Buskirk J (2009b) Getting in shape: adaptation and phylogenetic inertia in morphology of Australian anuran larvae. J Evol Biol 22:1326-1337
53. Van Buskirk J, Arioli M (2005) Habitat specialization and adaptive phenotypic divergence of anuran populations. J Evol Biol 18:596-608
54. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (1999) Plasticity and selection explain variation in tadpole phenotype between ponds with different predator composition. Oikos 85:31-39
55. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (2000) Influence of tail shape on tadpole swimming performance. J Exp Biol 203:2149-2158
56. Van Buskirk J, Relyea RA (1998) Selection for phenotypic plasticity in Rana sylvatica tadpoles. Biol J Linn Soc 65:301-328
57. Van Buskirk J, Saxer G (2001) Delayed costs of an induced defense in tadpoles? Morphology, hopping, and developmental rate at metamorphosis. Evolution 55:821-829
58. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA, Werner EE (1997) Natural selection for environmentally induced phenotypes in tadpoles. Evolution 51:1983-1992
59. Via S, Lande R (1985) Genotype-by-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39:505-522
60. Wang F (2006) Quantitative methods and applications in GIS. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton
61. Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:337-363
62. West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York
63. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385-397