Effects of behavioral and morphological plasticity on risk of predation in a Neotropical tadpole

Oecologia

Volumn 141, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 130-138

  McIntyre, Peter B ^a   Baldwin, Sandra ^b   Flecker, Alexander S ^a  

^a Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anuran; Belostoma; Phenotypic plasticity; Pigmentation; Rana palmipes

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; CHEMICAL CUE; FROG; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PREDATION RISK;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FROG; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HETEROPTERA; HISTOLOGY; LARVA; METABOLISM; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PIGMENTATION; PREDATION; RISK FACTOR; TAIL; VENEZUELA;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CUES; HETEROPTERA; LARVA; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHENOTYPE; PIGMENTATION; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; RANIDAE; RISK FACTORS; TAIL; VENEZUELA;

ANIMALIA; ANURA; BELOSTOMA; RANA PALMIPES;

EID: 4944255815     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1652-x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Abrams PA (2003) Effects of altered resource consumption rates by one consumer species on a competitor. Ecol Lett 6:550-555
2. Anholt BR, Werner EE (1999) Density-dependent consequences of induced behavior. In: Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 218-230
3. Anholt BR, Werner EE, Skelly DK (2000) Effect of food and predators on the activity of four larval ranid frogs. Ecology 81:3509-3521
4. Arnqvist G, Johansson F (1998) Ontogenetic reaction norms of predator-induced defensive morphology in dragonfly larvae. Ecology 79:1847-1858
5. Azevedo-Ramos C, Van Sluys M, Hero J, Magnusson WE (1992) Influence of tadpole movement on predation by odonate naiads. J Herpetol 26:335-338
6. Babbitt KJ, Tanner GW (1998) Effects of cover and predator size on survival and development of Rana utricularia tadpoles. Oecologia 114:258-262
7. Barnett HK, Richardson JS (2002) Predation risk and competition effects on the life history characteristics of larval Oregon spotted frog and larval red-legged frog. Oecologia 132:436-444
8. Caldwell JP (1982) Disruptive selection: a tail color polymorphism in Acris tadpoles in response to differential predation. Can J Zool 60:2818-2827
9. Caldwell JP, Thorp JH, Jervey TO (1980) Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs. Oecologia 46:285-289
10. Dahl J, Peckarsky BL (2002) Induced morphological defenses in the wild: predator effects on a mayfly, Drunella coloradensis. Ecology 83:1620-1634
11. Dodson SI, Crowl TA, Peckarsky BL, Kats LB, Covich AP, Culp JM (1994) Non-visual communication in freshwater benthos: an overview. J N Am Benthol Soc 13:268-282
12. Doherty PA, Wassersug RJ, Lee JM (1998) Mechanical properties of the tadpole tail fin. J Exp Biol 201:2691-2699
13. Eklov P, Werner EE (2000) Multiple predator effects on size-dependent behavior and mortality of two species of anuran larvae. Oikos 88:250-258
14. Feder ME (1983) The relation of air breathing and locomotion to predation on tadpoles, Rana berlandieri, by turtles. Physiol Zool 56:522-531
15. Flecker AS, Feifarek BP, Taylor BW (1999) Ecosystem engineering by a tropical tadpole: density-dependent effects on habitat structure and larval growth rates. Copeia 1999:495-500
16. Flecker AS, Taylor BW, Bernhardt ES, Hood JM, Cornwell WK, Cassatt SR, Vanni MJ, Altman NS (2002) Interactions between herbivorous fishes and limiting nutrients in a tropical stream ecosystem. Ecology 83:1831-1844
17. Gascon C (1992) Aquatic predators and tadpole prey in central Amazonia: field data and experimental manipulations. Ecology 73:971-980
18. Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes for identification. Herpetologica 16:183-190
19. Havel JE (1987) Predator-induced defenses: a review. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 263-278
20. Hillis DM, de Sa R (1988) Phylogeny and taxonomy of the Rana palmipes group (Salientia: Ranidae). Herpetol Monogr 2:1-26
21. Hoff KS, Wassersug RJ (2000) Tadpole locomotion: axial movements and tail functions in a largely vertebraeless vertebrate. Am Zool 40:62-76
22. Holmes RM, Aminot A, Kerouel R, Hooker BA, Peterson BJ (1999) A simple and precise method for measuring ammonium in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:1801-1808
23. Kats LB, Dill LM (1998) The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5:361-394
24. Kornerup A, Wanscher JH (1978) Methuen handbook of colour. 3rd edn. Eyre Methuen, London
25. Lampert W (1989) The adaptive significance of diel vertical migration by zooplankton. Funct Ecol 3:21-27
26. Lardner B (2000) Morphological and life history responses to predators in larvae of seven anurans. Oikos 88:169-180
27. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619-640
28. Ludwig D, Rowe L (1990) Life history strategies for energy gain and predator avoidance under time constraints. Am Nat 135:686-707
29. McCollum SA, Leimberger JD (1997) Predator-induced morphological changes in an amphibian: predation by dragonflies affects tadpole shape and color. Oecologia 109:615-621
30. McCollum SA, Van Buskirk J (1996) Costs and benefits of a predator-induced polyphenism in the gray tree frog, Hyla chrysocelis. Evolution 50:583-593
31. McCollum EW, Crowder LB, McCollum SA (1998) Complex interactions of fish, snails, and littoral zone periphyton. Ecology 79:1980-1994
32. Nusch EA (1980) Comparison of different methods for chlorophyll and phaeopigment determination. Arch Hydrobiol Erge Limnol 14:14-36
33. Peacor SD (2002) Positive effect of predators on prey growth rate through induced modifications of prey behaviour. Ecol Lett 5:77-85
34. Peacor SD, Werner EE (2000) Predator effects on an assemblage of consumers through induced changes in consumer foraging behavior. Ecology 81:1998-2010
35. Peacor SD, Werner EE (2001) The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3904-3908
36. Persson A (1997) Effects of fish predation and excretion on the configuration of aquatic food webs. Oikos 79:137-146
37. Relyea RA (2001a) Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology 82:523-540
38. Relyea RA (2001b) The relationship between predation risk and antipredator responses in larval anurans. Ecology 82:541-554
39. Relyea RA (2002) Competitor-induced plasticity in tadpoles: consequences, cues, and connections to predator-induced plasticity. Ecol Monogr 72:523-540
40. Relyea RA (2003) Predators come and predators go: the reversibility of predator-induced traits. Ecology 84:1840-1848
41. Relyea RA (2004) Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology (in press)
42. Relyea RA, Hoverman JT (2003) The impact of larval predators on the morphology and fitness of juvenile treefrogs. Oecologia 134:596-604
43. Relyea RA, Werner EE (1999) Quantifying the relation between predator-induced behavior and growth performance in larval anurans. Ecology 80:2117-2124
44. Relyea RA, Werner EE (2000) Morphological plasticity in four larval anurans distributed along an environmental gradient. Copeia 2000:178-190
45. Richards SJ, Bull CM (1990) Size-limited predation on tadpoles of three Australian frogs. Copeia 1990:1041-1046
46. Schmidt BR, Amezquita A (2001) Predator-induced behavioral responses: tadpoles of the neotropical frog Phyllomedusa tarsius do not respond to all predators. Herpetol J 11:9-15
47. Semlitsch RD, Reyer HU (1992) Modification of anti-predator behavior in tadpoles by environmental conditions. J Anim Ecol 61:353-360
48. Sih A (1987) Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 203-224
49. Skelly DK (1994) Activity level and the susceptibility of anuran larvae to predation. Anim Behav 47:465-468
50. Skelly DK (2002) Experimental venue and estimation of interaction strength. Ecology 83:2097-2101
51. Skelly DK, Kiesecker JM (2001) Venue and outcome in ecological experiments: manipulations of larval anurans. Oikos 94:198-208
52. Smith DC (1983) Factors controlling tadpole populations of the chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata) on Isle Royal, Michigan. Ecology 64:501-510
53. Smith DC, Van Buskirk J (1995) Phenotypic design, plasticity, and ecological performance in two tadpoles. Am Nat 145:211-233
54. Tollrian R, Dodson SI (1999) Inducible defenses in cladocera: constraints, costs, and multipredator environments. In: Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 177-202
55. Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) (1999) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton
56. Travis J, Keen WH, Julianna J (1985) The role of relative body size in a predator-prey relationship between dragonfly naiads and larval anurans. Oikos 45:59-65
57. Van Buskirk J (2002a) A comparative test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: relationships between habitat and phenotype in anuran larvae. Am Nat 160:87-102
58. Van Buskirk J (2002b) Phenotypic lability and the evolution of predator-induced plasticity in tadpoles. Evolution 56:361-370
59. Van Buskirk J, Arioli M (2002) Dosage response of an induced defense: how sensitive are tadpoles to predation risk? Ecology 83:1580-1585
60. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (1999) Plasticity and selection explain variation in tadpole phenotype between ponds with different predator composition. Oikos 85:31-39
61. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (2000a) Functional mechanisms of an inducible defense in tadpoles: behavior and morphology influence mortality risk from predation. J Evol Biol 13:336-347
62. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (2000b) Influence of tail shape on tadpole swimming performance. J Exp Biol 203:2149-2158
63. Van Buskirk J, Relyea RA (1998) Selection for phenotypic plasticity in Rana sylvatica tadpoles. Biol J Linn Soc 65:301-328
64. Van Buskirk J, Schmidt BR (2000) Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in larval newts: trade-offs, selection, and variation in nature. Ecology 81:3009-3028
65. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA, Werner EE (1997) Natural selection for environmentally induced phenotypes in tadpoles. Evolution 51:1983-1992
66. Van Buskirk J, Mueler C, Portmann A, Surbeck M (2002) A test of the risk-allocation hypothesis: tadpole responses to temporal change in predation risk. Behav Ecol 13:526-530
67. Van Buskirk J, Anderwald P, Lupold S, Reinhardt L, Schuler H (2003) The lure effect, tadpole tail shape, and the target of dragonfly strikes. J Herpetol 37:420-424
68. Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:337-363