Which spatial heterogeneity framework? Consequences for conclusions about patchy population distributions

Ecology

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1476-1489

  Talley, Theresa Sinicrope ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

California's Central Valley (USA); Desmocerus californicus dimorphus; Gradient analysis; Hierarchical analysis; Metapopulation; Patch analysis; Patch dynamics; Patchy populations; Scaling; Spatial heterogeneity; Species distributions

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; HABITAT QUALITY; HOST PLANT; LEGUME; METAPOPULATION; MODEL; PATCHINESS; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; STOCHASTICITY; WATER AVAILABILITY;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

COLEOPTERA; DESMOCERUS CALIFORNICUS DIMORPHUS; SAMBUCUS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; BIODIVERSITY; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; BIODIVERSITY; CALIFORNIA; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHY; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 34547631435     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/06-0555     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Allen, T. F. H., and T. W. Hoekstra. 1990. The confusion between scale-defined levels and conventional levels of organization in ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 1:5-12.
2. Allen, T. F. H., and T. B. Starr. 1982. Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
3. Argov, Y., Y. Rossler, D. Rosen, and H. Voet. 2003. Stability in the host-parasitoid relationship of Dialeurodes citri and Encarsia lahorensis in the citrus orchard. Biocontrol 48:637-657.
4. Barr, C. B. 1991. The distribution, habitat, and status of the valley elderberry longhorn beetle, Desmocerus californicus dimorphus. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, California, USA.
5. Benedetti-Cecchi, L. 2001. Variability in abundance of algae and invertebrates at different spatial scales on rocky sea shores. Marine Ecology Progress Series 215:79-92.
6. Bonsall, M. B., and A. Hastings. 2004. Demographic and environmental stochasticity in predator-prey metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:1043-1055.
7. Boorman, S. A., and P. R. Levitt. 1973. Group selection on boundary of a stable population. Theoretical Population Biology 4:85-128.
8. Brown, J. H., O. J. Reichman, and D. W. Davidson. 1979. Granivory in desert ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10:201-227.
9. CaSIL. 2000. The California spatial information library. State of California, Sacramento, California, USA. 〈http://gis.ca.gov/〉
10. Clements, F. E., and V. E. Shelford. 1939. Bioecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
11. Collinge, S. K., M. Holyoak, C. B. Barr, and J. T. Marty. 2001. Riparian habitat fragmentation and population persistence of the threatened valley elderberry longhorn beetle in central California. Biological Conservation 100:103-113.
12. Cowles, H. C. 1899. The ecological relations of the vegetation of the sand dunes of Lake Michigan. Botanical Gazette 27:95-117, 167-202, 281-308, 361-391.
13. Cushman, S. A., and K. McGarigal. 2004. Hierarchical analysis of forest bird species-environment relationships in the Oregon Coast Range. Ecological Applications 14:1090-1105.
14. DANR [Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources]. 2005. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources methods of analysis. University of California, Davis, California, USA. 〈http://danranlab.ucdavis.edu〉
15. Dayton, P. K. 1971. Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecological Monographs 41:351-389.
16. Dayton, P. K. 1994. Community landscape: scale and stability in hard bottom marine communities. Pages 289-332 in A. G. Hildrew, P. S. Giller, and D. Raffaelli, editors. Aquatic ecology: scale, pattern, and processes. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.
17. Dayton, P. K., and M. J. Tegner. 1984. The importance of scale in community ecology: a kelp forest example with terrestrial analogs. Pages 458-481 in P. W. Price, C. N. Slobodchikoff, and W. S. Gaud, editors. A new ecology: novel approaches to interactive systems. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
18. ESRI [Environmental Systems Research Institute]. 2004a. ArcGIS 9.0 geographic information system software. ESRI, Redlands, California, USA.
19. ESRI [Environmental Systems Research Institute]. 2004b. ArcView 3.2. ESRI, Redlands, California, USA.
20. Forman, R. T. 1995. Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
21. Frank, K. 2005. Metapopulation persistence in heterogeneous landscapes: lessons about the effect of stochasticity. American Naturalist 165:374-388.
22. Gleason, H. A. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 53:7-26.
23. Graham, M. H. 2003. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84:2809-2815.
24. Gullan, P. J., and P. S. Cranston. 2004. The insects: an outline of entomology. Third edition. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK.
25. Haddad, N. M., and K. A. Baum. 1999. An experimental test of corridor effects on butterfly densities. Ecological Applications 9:623-633.
26. Hanks, L. M. 1999. Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of cerambycid beetles. Annual Review of Entomology 44:483-505.
27. Hanski, I. 1994a. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:151-162.
28. Hanski, I. 1994b. Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:131-135.
29. Harrison, S., and E. Bruna. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: What do we know for sure? Ecography 22:225-232.
30. Haury, L. R., J. S. McGovern, and P. Wiebe. 1978. Patterns and processes in the time-space scales of plankton distributions. Pages 277-327 in J. Steele, editor. Spatial pattern in plankton communities. Plenum Press, New York, New York, USA.
31. Hewitt, J. E., P. Legendre, B. H. McArdle, S. F. Thrush, C. Bellehumeur, and S. M. Lawrie. 1997. Identifying relationships between adult and juvenile bivalves at different spatial scales. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 216:77-98.
32. Hewitt, J. E., S. F. Thrush, V. J. Cummings, and R. D. Pridmore. 1996. Matching patterns with processes: predicting the effect of size and mobility on the spatial distributions of the bivalves Macomona liliana and Austrovenus stutchburyi. Marine Ecology Progress Series 135:57-67.
33. Hewitt, J. E., S. F. Thrush, P. Legendre, V. J. Cummings, and A. Norkko. 2002. Integrating heterogeneity across spatial scales: interactions between Atrina zelandica and benthic macrofauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series 239:115-128.
34. Hill, J. K., C. D. Thomas, and O. T. Lewis. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. Journal of Animal Ecology 65:725-735.
35. Jax, K., C. G. Jones, and S. T. A. Pickett. 1998. The self-identity of ecological units. Oikos 82:253-264.
36. Jenness, J. 2004. Nearest features, with distances and bearings. Jenness Enterprises, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. 〈http://jennessent.com/arcview/ nearest_features.htm〉
37. JMP. 2005. JMP statistical discovery software. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA. 〈http://www.jmp.com/〉
38. Keddy, P. A. 1991. Working with heterogeneity: an operator's guide to environmental gradients. Pages 181-201 in J. Kolasa and S. T. A. Pickett, editors. Ecological heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
39. Kotliar, N. B., and J. A. Wiens. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59:253-260.
40. Leal, W. S., X. Shi, K. Nakamuta, M. Ono, and J. Meinwald. 1995. Structure, stereochemistry, and thermal isomerization of the male sex pheromone of the longhorn beetle Anaglyptus subfasciatus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 92:1038-1042.
41. Legendre, P., and M. J. Fortin. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80:107-138.
42. Legendre, P., et al. 1997. Spatial structure of bivalves in a sandflat: scale and generating processes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 216:99-128.
43. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15:237-240.
44. Lindenmayer, D. B., and R. C. Lacy. 1995. Metapopulation viability of arboreal marsupials in fragmented old-growth forests: comparison among species. Ecological Applications 5:183-199.
45. Linsley, E. G., and J. A. Chemsak. 1972. The Cerambycidae of North America. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
46. MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
47. Moilanen, A., and I. Hanski. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79:2503-2515.
48. Morales, J. M., and S. P. Ellner. 2002. Scaling up animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: the importance of behavior. Ecology 83:2240-2247.
49. Naiman, R. J., and H. Decamps. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:621-658.
50. O'Neill, R. V. 2001. Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (With full military honors of course!). Ecology 82:3275-3284.
51. O'Neill, R. V., D. DeAngelis, J. B. Waide, and T. F. H. Allen. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
52. O'Neill, R. V., R. H. Gardner, B. T. Milne, M. G. Turner, and B. Jackson. 1991. Heterogeneity and spatial hierarchies. Pages 85-96 in J. Kolasa and S. T. A. Pickett, editors. Ecological Heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
53. Pausas, J. G., G. M. Rusch, and J. Leps. 2003. Plant functional types in relation to disturbance and land use: Introduction. Journal of Vegetation Science 14:307-310.
54. Possingham, H. P., D. B. Lindenmayer, T. W. Norton, and I. Davies. 1994. Metapopulation viability analysis of the greater glider Petauroides volans in a wood production area. Biological Conservation 70:227-236.
55. Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132:652-661.
56. Schoener, T. W. 1989. Food webs from the small to the large. Ecology 70:1559-1589.
57. Sih, A., A. Bell, and J. C. Johnson. 2004. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:372-378.
58. Sjögren-Gulve, P., and I. Hanski. 2000. Metapopulation viability analysis using occupancy models. Ecological Bulletins 48:53-71.
59. Summerville, K. S., and T. O. Crist. 2004. Contrasting effects of habitat quantity and quality on moth communities in fragmented landscapes. Ecography 27:3-12.
60. Talley, T. S. 2005. Spatial ecology and conservation of the Valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Dissertation. University of California, Davis, California, USA.
61. Thomas, C. D., M. C. Singer, and D. A. Boughton. 1996. Catastrophic extinction of population sources in a butterfly metapopulation. American Naturalist 148:957-975.
62. Thrush, S. F. 1991. Spatial patterns in soft-bottom communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:75-79.
63. Thrush, S. F., J. E. Hewitt, V. J. Cummings, M. O. Green, G. A. Funnell, and M. R. Wilkinson. 2000. The generality of field experiments: interactions between local and broad-scale processes. Ecology 81:399-415.
64. Turner, M. G., S. E. Gergel, M. D. Dixon, and J. R. Miller. 2004. Distribution and abundance of trees in flood-plain forests of the Wisconsin River: environmental influences at different scales. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:729-738.
65. USFWS [U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service]. 1980. Listing the valley elderberry longhorn beetle as a threatened species with critical habitat. Pages 52803-52807 in Federal Register 45 (8 August). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
66. USFWS [U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service]. 1984. Recovery plan for the valley elderberry longhorn beetle. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon, USA.
67. van Coller, A. L., K. H. Rogers, and G. L. Heritage. 2000. Riparian vegetation-environment relationships: complimentarity of gradients versus patch hierarchy approaches. Journal of Vegetation Science 11:337-350.
68. Whittaker, R. H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biological Review 42:207-264.
69. Wiens, J. A. 1976. Population responses to patchy environments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7:81-120.
70. Wu, J., D. E. Jelinski, M. Luck, and P. T. Tueller. 2000. Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: scale variance and pattern metrics. Geographic Information Sciences 6:6-19.
71. Wu, J., and O. Loucks. 1995. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology 70:439-466.