Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 244-250

  Tomasi, C ^a   Bressan, E ^b   Corazza, B ^b   Mazzoleni, S ^b   Stellini, E ^b   Lith, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Image reconstruction; Reliability of results

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT POSITIONING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

CADAVER; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MANDIBLE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT POSITIONING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79955040862     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/17432330     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Schulze D, Heiland M, Schmelzle R, Rother UJ. Diagnostic possibilities of cone-beam computed tomography in the facial skeleton. Int Congr Ser 2004; 1268: 1179-1183.
2. Mupparapu M, Singer SR. Implant imaging for the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70: 32.
3. Wortche R, Hassfeld S, Lux CJ, Mussig E, Hensley FW, Krempien R, et al. Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 88-94.
4. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 126-130. (Pubitemid 38993338)
5. Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Käser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 367-378.
6. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72: 75-80. (Pubitemid 43326970)
7. Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Araki M, Iwai K, Sawada K, Akiyama Y. Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT. J Oral Sci 2006; 48: 27-34.
8. Walker L, Enciso R, Mah J. Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 418-423. (Pubitemid 41427086)
9. Tsuchida R, Araki K, Okano T. Evaluation of a limited cone-beam volumetric imaging system: comparison with film radiography in detecting incipient proximal caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 412-416.
10. Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T, Keeve E, Zoller JE. Diagnostic quality of panoramic views obtained by a newly developed digital volume tomography device for max-illofacial imaging. Quintessence Int 2007; 38: 763-772.
11. Liu DG, Zhang WL, Zhang ZY, Wu YT, Ma XC. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and observation of adjacent incisor resorption with cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 91-98.
12. Akdeniz BG, Grondahl HG, Magnusson B. Accuracy of proximal caries depth measurements: comparison between limited cone beam computed tomography, storage phosphor and film radiography. Caries Res 2006; 40: 202-207. (Pubitemid 43760294)
13. Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 2006; 10: 1-7. (Pubitemid 43309103)
14. Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, Hirsch E, Schutyser F, Quirynen M, et al. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 816-821.
15. Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007; 35: 207-211. (Pubitemid 47400214)
16. Mischkowski RA, Zinser MJ, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Keeve E, Zoller JE. Intraoperative navigation in the maxillofacial area based on 3D imaging obtained by a cone-beam device. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36: 687-694. (Pubitemid 47091509)
17. Choi SC, Ann CH, Choi HM, Heo MS, Lee SS. Accuracy of reformatted CT image for measuring the pre-implant site: analysis of the image distortion related to the gantry angle change. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 273-277.
18. Kim KD, Jeong HG, Choi SH, Hwang EH, Park CS. Effect of mandibular positioning on preimplant site measurement of the mandible in reformatted CT. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 177-183.
19. Sforza NM, Franchini F, Lamma A, Botticelli S, Ghigi G. Accuracy of computerized tomography for the evaluation of mandibular sites prior to implant placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27: 589-595.
20. Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Sanderink G. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31: 129-134.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: measurement error and correlation coefficients. Br Med J 1996; 313: 41-42. (Pubitemid 26229891)
22. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 228-231. (Pubitemid 38561060)
23. Naitoh M, Yamada S, Noguchi T, Ariji E, Nagao J, Mori K, et al. Three-dimensional display with quantitative analysis in alveolar bone resorption using cone-beam computerized tomography for dental use: a preliminary study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 607-612. (Pubitemid 44935756)
24. Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Mitsuya S, Kamemoto H, Ariji E. Measurement of mandibles with microfocus x-ray computerized tomography and compact computerized tomography for dental use. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 239-246. (Pubitemid 38561062)
25. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Brochhagen HG, Keeve E, et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 551-559.
26. Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LTJ, Hershey HG. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 534-542.
27. Lund H, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG. Accuracy and precision of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography AccuitomoH tomograms obtained with different reconstruction techniques. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 379-386.
28. Gupta R, Bartling SH, Basu SK, Ross WR, Becker H, Pfoh A, et al. Experimental flat-panel high-spatial-resolution volume CT of the temporal bone. Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 1417-1424. (Pubitemid 44364356)
29. Vazquez L, Saulacic N, Belser U, Bernard JP. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 81-85.
30. Frei C, Buser D, Dula K. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 490-497. (Pubitemid 40115777)