Effects of dose reduction on multi-detector computed tomographic images in evaluating the maxilla and mandible for pre-surgical implant planning: A cadaveric study

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 830-834

  Koizumi, Hiroshi ^a   Sur, Jaideep ^a   Seki, Kenji ^a   Nakajima, Koh ^a   Sano, Tsukasa ^b   Okano, Tomohiro ^a  

^a SHOWA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO DENTAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Dental implant; Dose reduction; Image quality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

CADAVER; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIATION DOSAGE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77955137664     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: 16000501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01925.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Preston RJ, Puskin JS, Ron E, Sachs RK, Samet JM, Setlow RB, Zaider M. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100:13761-13766.
2. Diederichs CG, Engelke WG, Richter B, Hermann KP, Oestmann JW. Must radiation dose for CT of the maxilla and mandible be higher than that for conventional panoramic radiography? American Journal of Neuroradiology 1996, 17:1758-1760.
3. Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Chen J, Ting HH, Shah ND, Nasir K, Einstein AJ, Nallamothu BK. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. New England Journal of Medicine 2009, 361:849-857.
4. Greess H, Wolf H, Lell M, Pirkl M, Kalender W, Bautz WA. Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions. European Journal of Radiology 2000, 10:391-394.
5. Hagtvedt T, Aalokken TM, Notthellen J, Kolbenstvedt A. A new low-dose CT examination compared with standard-dose CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. European Journal of Radiology 2003, 13:976-980.
6. Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. British Journal of Radiology 2008, 81:362-378.
7. Hamberg LM, Rhea JT, Hunter GJ, Thrall JH. Mutli-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology 2003, 226:762-772.
8. Honnef D, Wildberger JE, Haras G, Hohl C, Staatz G, Gunther RW, Mahnken AH. Prospective evaluation of image quality with use of a patient image gallery for dose reduction in pediatric 16-MDCT. American Journal of Roentgenology 2008, 190:467-473.
9. Imhof H, Czerny C, Dirisamer A. Head and neck imaging with MDCT. European Journal of Radiology 2003, 45:S23-S31.
10. 1990, International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Amsterdam, Elsevier
11. Managing patient dose in computed tomography, Annals of the ICRP, Publication 87 2001, International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Oxford, Pergamon Press
12. Judy PF, Swensson RG. Lesion detection and signal-to-noise ratio in CT images. Medical Physics 1981, 8:13-23.
13. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Sues C, Gies M, Greess H, Bautz WA. Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. European Journal of Radiology 1999, 9:323-328.
14. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, Saini S. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004, 230:619-628.
15. Kim MJ, Park CH, Choi SJ, Hwang KH, Kim HS. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 2009, 33:416-412.
16. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M, Hill C. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64 slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics 2008, 106:106-114.
17. Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008, 248:254-263.
18. Monsour PA, Dudhia R. Implant radiography and radiology. Australian Dental Journal 2008, 53((Suppl.)):S11-S25.
19. Mulkens TH, Broers C, Fieuws S, Termote JL, Bellnick P. Comparison of effective doses for low-dose MDCT and radiographic examination of sinuses in children. American Journal of Roentgenology 2005, 184:1611-1618.
20. Mullins ME, Lev MH, Bove P, O'Reilly CE, Saini S, Rhea JT, Thrall JH, Hunter GJ, Hamberg LM, Gonzalez RG. Comparison of image quality between conventional and low-dose nonenhanced head CT. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2004, 25:533-538.
21. Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y, Sakaino R, Tsuchida R, Iwai K, Seki K, Araki K. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2009, 38:79-85.
22. Rothman SLG. Dental Applications of Computerized Tomography: Surgical Planning for Implant Placement 1998, Illinois, Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
23. van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Florie J, Nio CY, Serlie IWO, Schutter MP, van Rijn JC, Vos FM, Glas AS, Bossuyt PMM, Bartelsman JFW, Lameris JS, Stoker J. CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction- comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients. Radiology 2004, 232:611-620.