The early radiological results of the uncemented Oxford medial compartment knee replacement

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 94 B, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 334-338

  Hooper, G J ^a   Maxwell, A R ^a   Wilkinson, B ^a,b   Mathew, J ^a   Woodfield, T B F ^a   Penny, I D ^a   Burn, P J ^a   Frampton, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b CHRISTCHURCH HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR; FLUOROSCOPY; FOLLOW UP; HIGH ACTIVITY ARTHROPLASTY SCORE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; OXFORD MEDIAL COMPARTMENT KNEE REPLACEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; SCORING SYSTEM; TIBIA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84857853840     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.27407     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kort NP, van Raay JJ, Cheung J, Jolink C, Deutman R. Analysis of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using minimally invasive technique in patients 60 and above: an independent prospective series. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:1331-1334.
2. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, et al. Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:970-976. (Pubitemid 33151871)
3. No authors listed. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. National joint register: 11 year report, 2009. http://www.nzoa.org.nz/ Publications%20Guidelines%20and%20Reports.php (date last accessed 28 November 2011).
4. Davidson D, Graves S, Tomkins A, et al. Australian Orthopaedic Association: annual report 2009: hip and knee arthroplasty September 1999 to December 2008. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/documents/aoanjrrreport- 2009.pdf (date last accessed 28 November 2010).
5. Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell AG, Frampton C. The survivorship and functional outcomes of unicompartmental knee replacements converted to total knee replacements: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:508-512.
6. Hang JR, Stanford TE, Graves SE, et al. Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Orthop 2010;81:95-98.
7. Klemme WR, Galvin EG, Petersen SA. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: sequential radiographic and scintigraphic imaging with an average five-year follow- up. Clin Orthop 1994;301:233-238. (Pubitemid 24119279)
8. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop 1999;367:50-60. (Pubitemid 29503678)
9. Tibrewal SB, Grant KA, Goodfellow JW. The radiolucent line beneath the tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1984;66-B:523-528. (Pubitemid 14003919)
10. Hooper GJ, Rothwell AG, Frampton C. The low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective study with a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:58-63.
11. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Beard DJ, et al. Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:185-189.
12. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:63-69.
13. Talbot S, Hooper G, Stokes A, Zordan R. Use of a new high-activity arthroplasty score to assess function of young patients with total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:268-273.
14. Gulati A, Chau R, Pandit HG, et al. The incidence of physiological radiolucency following Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement and its relationship to outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:896-902.
15. Forsythe ME, Englund RE, Leighton RK. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a cementless perspective. Can J Surg 2000;43:417-424. (Pubitemid 32002424)
16. Kalra S, Smith TO, Berko B, Walton NP. Assessment of radiolucent lines around the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: sensitivity and specificity for loosening. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:777-781.
17. Smith TO, Hing CB, Davies L, Donell ST. Fixed versus mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement: a meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009;95:599-605.
18. Borus T, Thornhill T. Unicompartment knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16:9-18.
19. Li MG, Yao F, Joss B, et al. Mobile vs. fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics. Knee 2006;13:365-370. (Pubitemid 44311493)
20. Waters T, Lusty P, Walter W, Zicat B. Stability and ingrowth of cementless tibial fixation without screws in rotating platform total knee arthroplasty: minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B(Suppl):329-330.
21. Monk AP, Keys GW, Murray DW. Loosening of the femoral component after unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:405-408.