Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 185-189

  Pandit, H ^a,b   Jenkins, C ^a,b   Beard, D J ^a,b   Gallagher, J ^a,b   Price, A J ^a,b   Dodd, C A F ^a,b   Goodfellow, J W ^a,b   Murray, D W ^a,b  

^a NUFFIELD ORTHOPAEDIC CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; HYDROXYAPATITE; TITANIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TIBIA;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE CEMENTS; CEMENTATION; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TIBIA; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 59949097029     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21413     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. No authors listed. SKAR: The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2007. http://www.knee.nko.Se/english/online/uploadedfiles/110- SKAR2007-Engli.2.pdf (date last accessed 7 October 2008).
2. Saxler G, Temmen TD, Bontemps G. Medium-term results of the AMC-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 2004;11:349-55.
3. Magnussen PA, Bartlett RJ. Cementless PCA unicompartmental joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the knee: a prospective study of 51 cases. J Arthroplasty 1990;5:151-8.
4. Forsythe ME, Englund ER, Leighton RK. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a cementless perspective. Can J Surg 2000;43:417-24.
5. White SH, Ludkowski PF, Goodfellow JW. Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1991;73-B:582-6.
6. Goodfellow J, O'Connor J, Dodd C, Murray D. Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee. First edition. Oxford University Press, 2006:190.
7. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:63-9.
8. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13-14.
9. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 1985;198:43-9.
10. Beard DJ, Pandit H, Gill HS, et al. The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1597-601.
11. Beard DJ, Pandit H, Ostlere S et al. Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1602-7.
12. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers KP, et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1010-14.
13. Tibrewal SB, Grant KA, Goodfellow JW. The radiolucent line beneath the tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1984;66-B:523-8.
14. Weale AE, Murray DW, Crawford R, et al. Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after 'Oxford' medial unicompartmental arthroplasty?: a clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999;81-B:783-9.
15. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW. The Oxford medial uni-compartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:54-60.
16. Chau R, Gulati A, Pandit HG, et al. An acceptable limit of the tibial component overhang in the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. [Abstract]. Annual Meeting of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee. Bournemouth 2008.