Mobile vs. fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: A randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics

Knee

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 365-370

  Li, Ming G ^a   Yao, Felix ^a   Joss, Brendan ^a   Ioppolo, James ^a   Nivbrant, Bo ^a   Wood, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Fixed bearing UKA; Knee kinematics; Mobile bearing UKA; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INCIDENCE; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; WEIGHT BEARING;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATION;

EID: 33748141517     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2006.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Murray D.W., Goodfellow J.W., and O'Connor J.J. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80 (1998) 983-989
2. Svard U.C., and Price A.J. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 (2001) 191-194
3. Berger R.A., Meneghini R.M., Jacobs J.J., Sheinkop M.B., Della Valle C.J., Rosenberg A.G., et al. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 999-1006
4. Price A.J., Waite J.C., and Svard U. Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 435 (2005) 171-180
5. Emerson R.H., Hansborough T., Reitman R.D., Rosenfeldt W., and Higgins L.L. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed bearing unicompartmental knee implant. Clin Orthop 404 (2002) 62-70
6. Gleeson R.E., Evans R., Ackroyd C.E., Webb J., and Newman J.H. Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study. Knee 11 (2004) 379-384
7. Confalonieri N., Manzotti A., and Pullen C. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed tibial bearing unicompartimental knee prosthesis: a prospective randomized trial using a dedicated outcome score. Knee 11 (2004) 357-362
8. Kozinn S.C., and Scott R. Unycondilar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71 (1989) 145-150
9. Hazaki S., Yokoyama Y., and Inoue H. A radiographic analysis of anterior-posterior translation in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 6 (2001) 390-396
10. Kellgren J.H., and Lawrence J.S. Radiologic assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16 (1957) 494-501
11. Dennis D., Komistek R., Scuderi G., Argenson J.N., Insall J., Mahfouz M., et al. In vivo three-dimensional determination of kinematics for subjects with a normal knee or a unicompartmental or total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 Suppl 2 (2001) 104-115
12. Uvehammer J. Knee joint kinematics, fixation and function related to joint area design in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 72 Suppl 299 (2001) 1-52
13. Argenson J.A., Komistek R.D., Aubaniac J.M., Dennis D.A., Northcut E.J., Anderson D.T., et al. In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 1049-1054
14. Iwaki H., Pinskerova V., and Freeman M.A.R. Tibiofemoral movement: 1. The shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 (2000) 1189-1195
15. Nakagawa S., Kadoya Y., Todo S., Kobayashi A., Sakamoto H., Freeman M.A.R., et al. Tibiofemoral movement: 3. Full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 (2000) 1199-1200
16. McGovern T.F., Ammeen D.J., Collier J.P., Currier B.H., and Engh G.A. Rapid polyethylene failure of unicondylar tibial components sterilized with gamma irradiation in air and implanted after a long shelf life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 (2002) 901-906
17. Collier M.B., Engh Jr. C.A., and Engh G.A. Shelf age of the polyethylene tibial component and outcome of unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 (2004) 763-769
18. Engh G.A., Dwyer K.A., and Hanes C.K. Polyethylene wear of metal-backed tibial components in total and unicompartmental knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74 (1992) 9-17
19. Psychoyios V., Crawford R.W., O'Connor J.J., and Murray D.W. Wear of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A retrieval study of 16 specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80 (1998) 976-982
20. Blunn G.W., Joshi A.B., Minns R.J., Lidgren L., Lilley P., Ryd L., et al. Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties. A comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prostheses. J Arthroplasty 12 (1997) 281-290
21. Bartley R.E., Stulberg S.D., Robb III W.J., and Sweeney H.J. Polyethylene wear in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 299 (1994) 18-24
22. Gioe T.J., Killeen K.K., Hoefel D.P., Bert J.M., Comfort T.K., Scheltema K., et al. Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry. Clin Orthop 416 (2003) 111-119
23. Hodgkinson J.P., Shelley P., and Wroblewski B.M. The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 228 (1988) 105-109