Use of a New High-Activity Arthroplasty Score to Assess Function of Young Patients With Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 268-273

  Talbot, Simon ^a   Hooper, Gary ^a   Stokes, Andrew ^a   Zordan, Rachel ^b  

^a CHRISTCHURCH HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

assessment in young patients; High Activity Arthroplasty Score; higher activity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLIMBING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HIGH ACTIVITY ARTHROPLASTY SCORE; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; RUNNING; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF EVALUATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WALKING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PILOT PROJECTS; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 74249109364     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Tegner Y., and Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198 (1985) 43
2. Merle d'Aubigne R., and Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36 (1954) 451
3. Charnley J. Long term results of low friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972; 54:61-76.54; 36:451.
4. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. JBJS Am 51 (1969) 737
5. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of the WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthopaedic Rheumatology 1 (1988) 95
6. Whitehouse S.L., Lingard E.A., Katz J.N., et al. Development and testing of a reduced WOMAC function scale. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85 (2003) 706
7. Kreibich D.N., Vaz M., Bourne R.B., et al. What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement?. Clin Orthop 331 (1996) 221
8. Marx R.G., Jones E.C., Alien A.A., et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 (2001) 1459
9. Pollard B., Johnston M., and Dixon D. Theoretical framework and methodological development of common subjective health outcome measures in osteoarthritis: a critical review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5 (2007) 14
10. Whitehouse S.L., Blom A.W., Taylor A.H., et al. The Oxford Knee Score; problems and pitfalls. Knee 12 (2005) 287
11. Healy W.L., Iorio R., and Lemos M.J. Athletic activity after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 380 (2000) 65
12. Dubs L., Gschwend N., and Munzinger U. Sport after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 101 (1983) 161
13. Ritter M.A., and Meding J.B. Total hip arthroplasty. Can the patient play sports again?. Orthopedics 10 (1987) 1447
14. McGrory B.J., Stuart M.J., and Sim F.H. Participation in sports after hip and knee arthroplasty: review of literature and survey of surgeon preferences. Mayo Clin Proc 70 (1995) 342
15. Chatterji U., Ashworth M.J., Lewis P.L., et al. Effect of knee arthroplasty on recreational and sporting activity. ANZ Journal of Surgery 7 (2005) 405
16. Walton N.P., Jahromi I., Lewis P.L., et al. Patient-perceived outcomes and return to sport and work: TKA versus mini-incision Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 19 (2006) 112