Development of design principles for automated systems in transport control

Ergonomics

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 37-54

  Balfe, Nora ^a   Wilson, John R ^b   Sharples, Sarah ^b   Clarke, Theresa ^a  

^a NETWORK RAIL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

automation; control centres; ergonomics design principles; rail; signalling

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED SYSTEMS; AUTOMATION SYSTEMS; CONTROL CENTRES; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; ERGONOMICS DESIGN PRINCIPLES; FUTURE GENERATIONS; IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS; LOW LEVEL; QUALITATIVE STUDY; TRANSPORT CONTROL;

DESIGN; RAILS; SIGNALING; USER INTERFACES; VEHICLE WHEELS;

AUTOMATION;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; DEVICE SAFETY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVIEW; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MANPOWER; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RAILWAY; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM; WORKLOAD;

AUTOMATION; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RAILROADS; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84857816696     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2011.636456     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Atoyan, H., Duquet, J.-R. and Robert, J.-M. Trust in new decision aid systems. Proceedings of the 18th international conference on association francophone d'interaction homme-machine. April18-212006. pp.115-122. New York: ACM Press.
2. Bainbridge, L. 1983. Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19(6): 775-779.
3. Balfe, N. 2008. "Structured observations of automation use". In Contemporary ergonomics 2008, Edited by: Bust, P. D. 552-557. London: Taylor & Francis.
4. Balfe, N. Effects of signalling automation on workload and performance. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on rail human factors. March3-52009, Lille, France. [CD-ROM]
5. Beck, H. P., Dzindolet, M. T. and Pierce, L. G. 2007. Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task. Human Factors, 49(3): 429-437.
6. Bekier, M., Molesworth, B. R.C. and Williamson, A. 2011. Defining the drivers for accepting decision making automation in air traffic management. Ergonomics, 54(4): 347-356.
7. Billings, C. E. 1991. Human-centered aircraft automation: a concept and guidelines (No. NASA Technical Memorandum 103885), Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
8. Billings, C. E. 1997. Issues concerning human-centered intelligent systems: what's 'human-centered' and what's the problem? [online] Available from: www.ifp.uiuc.edu [Accessed 24 April 2005]
9. Billings, C. E. and Woods, D. D. 1994. "Concerns about adaptive automation in aviation systems". In Human performance in automated systems: current research and trends, Edited by: Mouloua, M. and Parasuraman, R. 263-269. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Christoffersen, K. and Woods, D. D. 2001. "How to make automated systems team players". In Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research, Edited by: Salas, E. Vol2, 1-12. Vol. 2. New York: JAI Press/Elsevier.
11. Dekker, S. W.A. 2004. "On the other side of promise: what should we automate today?". In Human factors for civil flight deck design, Edited by: Harris, D. 183-198. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
12. de-Vries, P., Midden, C. and Bouwhuis, D. 2003. The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6): 719-735.
13. Dixon, S. R. and Wickens, C. D. 2006. Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: a reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload. Human Factors, 48(3): 474-486.
14. Dzindolet, M. T. 2003. The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6): 697-718.
15. Endsley, M. R. 1996. "Automation and situation awareness". In Automation and human performance: theory and applications, Edited by: Parasuraman, R. and Mouloua, M. 163-181. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Endsley, M. R. and Kiris, E. O. 1995. The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37(2): 381-394.
17. Hoc, J. M. 2000. From human-machine interaction to human-machine cooperation. Ergonomics, 43(7): 833-843.
18. Hollnagel, E. and Woods, D. D. 2005. Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
19. Hopkin, V. D. and Wise, J. A. 1996. "Human factors in air traffic system automation". In Automation and human performance: theory and applicatiosn, Edited by: Parasuraman, R. and Mouloua, M. 319-336. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Kaber, D. B. and Endsley, M. R. 1997. Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety. Process Safety Progress, 16(3): 126-131.
21. Kauppi, A. 2005. "Future train traffic control: control by re-planning". In Rail human factors: supporting the integrated railway, 296-308. Aldershot: Ashgate.
22. Kauppi, A. 2006. Future train traffic control: control by re-planning. Cognition, Technology & Work, 8(1): 50-56.
23. Lee, J. D. and Moray, N. 1994. Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(1): 153-184.
24. Lee, J. D. and See, K. A. 2004. Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1): 50-80.
25. Lenior, D. 2006. Human-factors engineering for smart transport: decision support for car drivers and train traffic controllers. Applied Ergonomics, 37(4): 479-490.
26. Lewandowsky, S., Mundy, M. and Tan, G. P.A. 2000. The dynamics of trust: comparing humans to automation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 6(2): 104-123.
27. Macdonald, W. A. Train controller interface design: factors influencing mental workload. Proceedings of the international conference on human interfaces in control rooms, cockpits and command centres. June21-231999. pp.31-36. London: Institute of Electrical Engineers.
28. Madhavan, P. and Wiegmann, D. A. 2007. Similarities and differences between human-human and human-automation trust: an integrative review. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8(4): 277-301.
29. Madsen, M. and Gregor, S. Measuring human-computer trust. Proceedings of the 11th Australasian conference on information systems. December6-82000. Edited by: Gable, G. and Viatle, M. pp.53-64. Victoria: AIS.
30. Megaw, T. 2005. "The definition and measurement of mental workload". In Evaluation of human work, 3rd ed, Edited by: Wilson, J. R. and Corlett, N. 525-551. London: Taylor & Francis.
31. Merritt, S. M. and Ilgen, D. R. 2008. Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history based trust in human-automation interactions. Human Factors, 50(2): 194-210.
32. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, M. A. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Miller, C. The playbook approach to adaptive automation. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 49th annual meeting. September26-302005. pp.15-19. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
34. Miller, C. A. and Parasuraman, R. 2007. Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation: delegation interfaces for supervisory control. Human Factors, 49(1): 57-75.
35. Moray, N. 2000. Culture, politics and ergonomics. Ergonomics, 43(7): 858
36. Moray, N., Inagaki, T. and Itoh, M. 2000. Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 6(1): 44-58.
37. Mosier, K. L., Skitka, L. J. and Korte, K. J. 1994. "Cognitive and social psychological issues in flight crew/automation interaction". In Human performance in automated systems: current research and trends, Edited by: Mouloua, M. and Parasuraman, R. 191-197. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Muir, B. M. and Moray, N. Operators' trust in and use of automatic controllers. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the human factors association of Canada. November26-291989. pp.163-166. Ontario: Human Factors Association of Canada.
39. Muir, B. M. and Moray, N. 1996. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics, 39(3): 429-460.
40. Norman, D. A. 1990. The 'problem' with automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not 'over-automation'. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B327(1241): 585-593.
41. Olsen, W. A. and Sarter, N. B. Supporting informed consent in human-machine collaboration: the role of conflict type, time pressure, and display design. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 43rd annual meeting. 27 September-1 October1999. pp.189-193. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
42. Oppenheim, A. N. 1992. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement, 2nd ed, London: Continuum.
43. Parasuraman, R. and Riley, V. 1997. Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2): 230-253.
44. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B. and Wickens, C. D. 2000. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3): 286-297.
45. Pidgeon, N. 1996. "Grounded theory: theoretical background". In Handbook of qualitative research methods, Edited by: Richardson, J. T.E. 75-85. Leicester: BPS Books.
46. Riley, V. 1994. "A theory of operator reliance on automation". In Human performance in automated systems: current research and trends, Edited by: Mouloua, M. and Parasuraman, R. 8-14. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Robson, C. 2002. Real world research, 2nd ed, Oxford: Blackwell.
48. Sandblad, B. 2002. "New control strategies and user interfaces for train traffic control". In Computers in railways VIII, Edited by: Allan, J., Hill, R. J., Brebbia, C. A. and Sciutto, G. Boston, MA: WIT Press.
49. Sarter, N. B. and Woods, D. D. 1997. Team Play with a powerful and independent agent: Operational experiences and automation surprises on the airbus A-320. Human Factors, 39(4): 553-569.
50. Sarter, N. B., Woods, D. D. and Billings, C. E. 1997. "Automation surprises". In Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 2nd ed, Edited by: Salvendy, G. 1926-1943. New York: Wiley.
51. Sheridan, T. B. 1999. "Human supervisory control". In Handbook of systems engineering and management, Edited by: Sage, A. P. and Rouse, W. B. 645-690. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
52. Sheridan, T. B. and Parasuraman, R. 2006. "Human-automation interaction". In Reviews of human factors and ergonomics. Vol. 1, Edited by: Nickerson, R. S. vol. 1, 89-129. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
53. Wickens, C. D. and Dixon, S. R. 2007. The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: a synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 8(3): 201-212.
54. Wiegmann, D. A., Rich, A. M. and Zhang, H. 2001. Automated diagnostic aids: the effects of aid reliability on users' trust and reliance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2(4): 352-367.
55. Wiener, E. L. 1989. Human factors of advanced technology ('glass cockpit') transport aircraft, Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center. Report Number 117528
56. Woods, D. D. 1996. "Decomposing automation: apparent simplicity, real complexity". In Automation technology and human performance, Edited by: Parasuraman, R. and Mouloua, M. 3-17. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Woods, D. D. 1997. "Human-centered software agents: lessons from clumsy automation". In Human centered systems: information, interactivity and intelligence, Edited by: Flanagan, J., Huang, T., Jones, P. and Kasif, S. 288-293. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
58. Young, M. S. and Stanton, N. A. 1997. Automotive automation: investigating the impact on drivers' mental workload. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 1(4): 325-336.