The Playbook™ approach to adaptive automation

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 15-19

  Miller, Christopher ^a   Funk, Harry ^a   Wu, Peggy ^a   Goldman, Robert ^a   Meisner, John ^a   Chapman, Marc ^a  

^a SMART INFORMATION FLOW TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE AUTOMATION; HUMAN SUBORDINATES; SUBORDINATE SYSTEMS;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLANNING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 44349085458     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Bainbridge, Lisanne (1983). Ironies of Automation. Increasing levels of automation can increase, rather than decrease, the problems of supporting the human operator. Automatica, 19, 775-779.
2. Reprinted in : (1987) Rasmussen, J., Duncan, K. and Leplat, J. (eds.) New Technology and Human Error, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 276-283. http://www.bainbrdg.demon.co.uk/Papers/Ironies.html
3. Bonasso, P. Issues in providing adjustable autonomy in the 3T architecture. Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium, on Agents with Adjustable Autonomy. Stanford, CA; March 22-24, 1999.
4. Cockburn, A. "Growth of Human Factors in Application Development" http://alistair.cockburn.us/crystal/articles/gohfiad/ growthofhumanfactorsinsd.htm
5. Cruz, J., Simaan, M., Gacic, A., Jiang, H., Letellier, B., Li, M. and Liu, Y. "Game-Theoretic Modeling and Control of a Military Air Operation," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 37, No.4, October 2001.
6. Duggan, D. S. (2001). "Demonstration of an Integrated Variable Autonomy UAV Flight Control System", Phase II SBIR Final Report, AFRL-HE-WP-TR-2001-0035, January.
7. Funk, Harry B. and Christopher A. Miller (2001). User Acceptance and Plan Recognition: Why Even Perfect Intent Inferencing Might Not be Good Enough. In Prceedings of 2001 AAAI Fall Symposium.
8. Goldman, R., Haigh, K., Musliner, D., Pelican, M. (2000). MACBeth: A Multi-Agent Constraint-Based Planner, In Working Notes of the AAAI workshop "Constraints and AI Planning", 2000. 11-17.
9. Klein, G. Sources of Power. MIT Press; Cambridge, MA. 1998.
10. Matessa, Michael. (2001). Structured Interfaces in Collaborative Communication. In Prceedings of 200.1 AAAI Fall Symposium.
11. Mitchell, Christine (1998). Available at: http://mentalmodels.mitre.org/ cog_eng/reference_documents/OFM-Model%20Based%20Design.pdf
12. Miller, C. (Guest Ed.) (2004). "Human-Computer Etiquette: Managing Expectations with Intelligent Agents." Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. April.
13. Miller, C. and Goldman, R.(1997). 'Tasking' Interfaces: Associates that know who's the boss. Proceedings of the 4th USAF/RAF/GAF Conference on Human/Electronic Crewmembers, (Kreuth, Germany, September 1997).
14. Miller, C. and Parasuraman, R. (2003). Beyond Levels of Automation: An Architecture for More Flexible Human-Automation Collaboration. Proceedings of the 47th Annual. Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, October 13-17; Denver, CO.
15. Miller, C. and Parasuraman, R. (2004)"Tasking" Interfaces for Flexible Interaction with Automation: Playbooks for Supervisory Control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics; Part A: Systems and Humans.
16. Miller, C., Pelican, M. and Goldman, R. (2000). "Tasking" Interfaces for Flexible Interaction with Automation: Keeping the Operator in Control. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Interaction with Complex Systems. (Urbana-Champaign, Ill. May 2000).
17. Miller, C., Funk, H. and Goldman, R. (2004). Delegation Approaches to Multiple Unmanned Vehicle Control. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Factors of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Manning the Unmanned Chandler, AZ; May 24-25.
18. Oppermann, R. (1994). Adaptive User Support. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
19. Parasuraman, R., & Byrne, E. A. (2003). Automation and Human Performance in Aviation. Principles of Aviation Psychology. P. Tsang and M. Vidulich, Eds. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2003, 311-356.
20. Parasuraman, Galster, & Miller, 2003, "Human Control of Multiple Robots in the Roboflag Simulation Environment", in Proceedings IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics (2003).
21. Parasuraman, Raja, Thomas B. Sheridan, and Christopher D. Wickens (2000). A. Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 30, No. 3, May 2000.
22. Parasuraman, R. and Riley, V., "Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse," Human Factors, Vol. 39, pp. 230-253, 1997.
23. Shattuck, L. Communication of Intent in Distributed Supervisory Control Systems. Unpublished dissertation. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 1995.
24. Shreckenghost, D. Human interaction with control software supporting adjustable autonomy. In Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Agents with Adjustable Autonomy. Stanford, CA; March 22-24, 1999.
25. Peter Squire, Hiroshi Furukawa, Scott Galster, Christopher Miller, and Raja Parasuraman, " Adaptability and flexibility are key! Benefits of the "playbook" interface for human supervision of multiple unmanned vehicles, "the Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, USA and September (2004)
26. Tabuada, P., Pappas, G. and Lima P. Feasible formations of multiagent systems. Submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Mar. 01