Automation usage decisions: Controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task

Human Factors

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 429-437

  Beck, Hall P ^a   Dzindolet, Mary T ^b   Pierce, Linda G ^c  

^a APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CAMERON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPRAISAL ERRORS; DISUSE RATES; TARGET DETECTION TASKS; TRAINING PROGRAMS;

AUTOMATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; FEEDBACK; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD;

TARGET TRACKING;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AUTOMATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; JUDGMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 34249036161     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872007X200076     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Beck, H. P., Dzindolet, M. T., & Pierce, L. G. (2002). Applying a decision-making model to understand misuse, disuse and appropriate automation use. In E. Salas (Ed.), Advances in human factors and cognitive engineering: Automation (Vol. 2, pp. 37-78). Amsterdam: JAI.
2. Beck, H. P., & Pierce, L. G. (1996). The impact of selected group processes on the coordination and motivation of Army teams (ARL-CR-292). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
3. Dzindolet, M. T., Petersen, S. A., Pomranky, R. A., Pierce, L. G., & Beck, H. P. (2003). The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human and Computer Studies, 58, 697-718.
4. Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L. G., Beck, H. P., & Dawe, L. A. (2002). The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task. Human Factors, 44, 79-94.
5. Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L. G., Beck, H. P., Dawe, L. A., & Anderson, B. W. (2001). Predicting soldier responses to combat identification systems. Military Psychology, 13, 147-164.
6. Gurner, J. (2001). Casey's last ride. Retrieved March 3, 2006, from http://www.watervalley.net/users/caseyjones/cj~long.htm
7. Halpin, S. M., Johnson, E. M., & Thornberry, J. A. (1973). Cognitive reliability in manned systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-22, 165-170.
8. Heimbeig, R. G., & Becker, R. E. (2002). Cognitive-behavioral group therapy for social phobia: Basic mechanisms and clinical strategies. New York: Guilford Press.
9. Kantowitz, B. H., Hanowski, R. J., & Kantowitz, S. C. (1997). Driver acceptance of unreliable traffic information in familiar and unfamiliar settings. Human Factors, 39, 164-176.
10. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Toney, R. J., Mullins, M. E., Weissbein, D. A., Brown, K. G., & Bell, B. S. (2001). Developing adaptability: A theory for the design of integrated-embedded training systems. In E. Salas (Ed.), Advances in human factors and cognitive engineering: Automation, (Vol. 1, pp. 59-123). Amsterdam: JAI.
11. Langer, E. J., & Roth, J. (1975). Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 951-955.
12. Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35, 1243-1270.
13. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing systems for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50-80.
14. Meichenbaum, D., & Cameron, R. (1974). The clinical potential of modifying what clients say to themselves. Psychotherapy: Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 11, 103-117.
15. Metzger, U., & Parasuraman, R. (2005). Automation in future air traffic management: Effects of decision aid reliability on controller performance and mental workload. Human Factors, 47, 35-49.
16. Moray, N., Inagaki, T., & Itoh, M. (2000). Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 44-58.
17. Morrissey, R. B. (1979, September 8). Three Mile Island: Sifting out the facts. America, 141, 91-93.
18. National Transportation Safety Board. (1996). Collision of Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority Train T111 with standing train at Shady Grove Station, near Gaithersburg, MD, January 6, 1996 (Rep. PB 96-916304). Washington, DC: Author.
19. Nikolic, M. I., & Sarter, N. B. (2001). Peripheral visual feedback: A powerful means of supporting effective attention allocation in event-driven, data-rich environments. Human Factors, 43, 30-38.
20. Parasuraman, R., & Miller, C. A. (2004). Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Communications of the ACM, 47, 51-55.
21. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
22. Rodin, J., & Langer, E. J. (1980). Aging labels: The decline of control and the fall of self-esteem. Journal of Social Issues, 36, 12-29.
23. Savidge, M. (2001, March 20). Greeneville skipper takes the stand. Retrieved March 3, 2006, from http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/03/20/sub. collision.02/index.html
24. Scaturo, D. J. (2005). Balancing directive and nondirective elements of treatment. In D. J. Scaturo (Ed.), Clinical dilemmas in psychotherapy: A transtheoretical approach to psychotherapy integration (pp. 67-81). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25. Singh, I. L., Deaton, J. E., & Parasuraman, R. (2001). Development of a scale to assess pilot attitudes to towards cockpit automation. Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 27, 205-211.
26. Singh, I. L., Hilburn, B., & Parasuraman, R. (1999). Effect of feedback on adaptive automation. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 25, 157-165.
27. Singh, I. L., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1993). Automation-induced "complacency": Development of the complacency-potential rating scale. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 111-122.
28. Singh, I. L., Sharma, H. O., & Parasuraman, R. (2001). Effects of manual training and automation reliability on automation induced complacency in a flight simulation task. Psychological Studies, 46, 21-27.
29. Sklar, A. E., & Sarter, N. B. (1999). Good vibrations: Tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domains. Human Factors, 41, 543-552.
30. Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books.
31. Thompson, S. C. (1981). Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 89-101.
32. Weil, M. M., & Rosen, L. D. (1995). The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective: A study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from twenty-three countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 11, 95-133.
33. Wiegmann, D. A. (2002). Agreeing with automated diagnostic aids: A study of users' concurrence strategies. Human Factors, 44, 44-50.
34. Wiegmann, D. A., & Cristina, F. J. (2000). Effects of feedback lag variability on the choice of an automated diagnostics aid: A preliminary predictive model. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1, 139-156.
35. Wiegmann, D. A., Rich, A., & Zhang, H. (2001). Automated diagnostic aids: The effects of aid reliability on user's trust and reliance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2, 352-367.