Trust in new decision aid systems

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 133, Issue , 2006, Pages 115-122

  Atoyan, Hasmik ^a   Duquet, Jean Rémi ^b   Robert, Jean Marc ^a  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Lockheed Martin Canada   (Canada)

Author keywords

Decision aid systems; Guidelines; Human computer interface; Reliability; Trust

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; RELIABILITY; TUNING;

DECISION AID SYSTEMS; DESIGN RULES; GUIDELINES;

LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS;

EID: 34250709625     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1132736.1132751     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Muir, B. M. and Moray, N. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics, Vol. 39, 1996, pp. 429-460.
2. Bisantz, A.M. and Seong, Y. Assessment of operator trust in and utilization of automated decision-aids under different framing conditions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 28 (2), 2001, pp. 85-97.
3. Dzindolet, M.T., Pierce, L.G., Beck, H.P. and Dawe, L.A. The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task. Human Factors, Vol. 44, 2002, pp. 79-94.
4. Human Resources Team. Guidelines for Trust in Future ATM Systems: A Literature Review. HRS/HSP-005-GUI-01. Edition Date: 05.05.2003 Edition 1.0. Released Issue. Brussels: EUROCONTROL
5. Lee, J.D. and See K.A. Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors, Vol. 46, 2004, pp. 50-80.
6. Miller, C.A. Trust in Adaptive Automation: The Role of Etiquette in Tuning Trust via Analogic and Affective Method. In Proeedings of the 1st International Conference on Augmented Cognition (July 22-27, 2005), Las Vegas, NV.
7. Parasuraman, R. and Riley, V. Humans and Automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, Vol. 39, 1997, pp. 230-253.
8. Parasuraman, R. and Miller, C.A. Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 47 (4), 2004, pp. 51-55.
9. Madsen, M. and Gregor, S. Measuring humancomputer trust. In Proceedings of 11th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (December 6-8, 2000), Brisbane.
10. Lee, J.D. and Moray, N. Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomis, Vol.35, 1992, pp. 1243-1270.
11. Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E. and MacGregor, D.O. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, Vol. 24 (2), 2002, pp. 1-12.
12. Nickerson, V.J. and Reilly R.R. A model for investigating the effects of machine autonomy on human behavior. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Track 5, Vol.5, 2004, p. 50130.1.
13. Riley, V. Human use of automation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minesota, 1994.
14. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B. and Wickens, C.D. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 30, 2000, pp. 426-432.
15. Lee, J.D. and Moray, N. Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaption to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 40, 1994, pp. 153-184.
16. Wickens, C. D. and Xu, X. Automation Trust, Reliability and Attention HMI 02 03, AHFD-02-14/MAAD-02-2, AHDF Technical Report, 2002.
17. Wickens, C.D., Gempler, K. and Morphew, M.E. Workload and reliability of predictor displays in aircraft traffic avoidance. Transportation Human Factors, Vol. 2, 2000, pp. 99-126.
18. Madhavan, P. and Wiegmann, D. Cognitive Anchoring on Self-Generated Decisions Reduces Operator Reliance on Automated Diagnostic Aids. Human Factors, Vol. 47 (2), 2005, pp. 332-341.
19. Dzindolet M.T., Petersona, S.A., Pomranky, R.A., Pierce, L.G. and Beck, H.P. The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 58 (6), 2003, pp. 697-718.
20. St. John, M. and Manes, D.I. Making unreliable automation useful. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2002, pp. 332-336.
21. 21.Rasmussen, J., Pejterson, A.M., and Goodstein, L.P. Cognitive systems engineering. New York: Wiley, 1994.
22. Madhavan, P., Wiegmann, D.A. and Lacson, F.C. Automation Failures on Tasks Easily Performed by Operators Undermines Trust in Automated Aids. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2003.
23. Muir, B.M. Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aides. International Journal of Man- Machine Studies, Vol. 27, 1987, pp. 527-539.
24. Muir, B.M. Trust in automation: Part 1. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, Vol. 37 (11), 1994, pp. 1905-1922.
25. Jiang, X., Khasawneh, M.T., Master, R., Bowling, S.R. Gramopadhye, A.K., Melloy, B.J., and Grimes, L. Measurement of Human Trust in a Hybrid Inspection System Based on Signal Detection Theory Measures. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 34 (5), 2004, pp. 407-419.
26. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R. and Singh, I. Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency". International Journal of Aviation Psychology, Vol. 3, 1993, pp. 1-23.
27. Mosier, K.L., Skitka, L.J., Heers, S. and Burdick, M. Automation bias: Decision making and performance in high-tech cockpits. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, Vol. 8, 1998, pp. 47-63.
28. Miller, C., Funk, H., Goldman, R., Meisner, J. and Wu, P. Implications of Adaptive vs. Adaptable UIs on Decision Making: Why "Automated Adaptiveness" is Not Always the Right Answer. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Augmented Cognition, Las Vegas, NV, 2005, July 22-27.
29. Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M. and Molloy, R. Affects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Human Factors, Vol. 38, 1996, pp. 665-679.
30. Briggs, P., Burford, B. and Dracup, C. Modeling self-confidence in users of a computer-based system showing unrepresentative design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 49, 1998, pp. 717-742
31. Kim, J. and Moon, J.Y. Designing towards emotional usability in customer interfacesTrustworthiness of cyber-banking system interfaces. Interaction with computers, Vol. 10, 1998, pp. 1-29.
32. Jian, J.Y, Bisantz, A.M., and Drury, C.G. Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, Vol. 4 (1), 2000, pp. 53-71.