A review on uncertainty analysis of large-scale hydrological cycle modeling system

Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 396-406

  Song, Xiaomeng ^a   Zhan, Chesheng ^b   Kong, Fanzhe ^a   Xia, Jun ^b  

^a CHINA UNIVERSITY OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH   (China)

Author keywords

Hydrological cycle modeling; Land atmosphere coupling; Large scale; PSUADE; Uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

AIR-SOIL INTERACTION; DATA SET; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LITERATURE REVIEW; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84857811197     PISSN: 03755444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Chen T H, Henderson S A, Milly P. Cabauw experimental results from the project or intercomparison of land-surface parameterization scheme. Journal of Climate, 1997, 10: 1194-1215.
2. Lohmann D, Lettenmaier D P, Liang X. The project for intercomparison of land-surface parameterization schemes (PLIPS) phase Red-Arkansas River basin experiment. Global and Planetary Change, 1998, 19: 161-179.
3. Shao Y, Henderson S A. Validation of soil moisture simulation in land surface parameterization schemes with HAPEX data. Global and Planetary Change, 1996, 13: 11-46.
4. Yong Bin, Ren Liliang. Development of a large-scale hydrological model TOPX and its coupling with regional intergrated environment modeling system RIEMS. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2009, 52(8): 1954-1965.
5. Ye Shouze, Xia Jun. Century's retrospect and looking into the future of hydrological science. Advances in Water Sciences, 2002, 13(1): 93-104.
6. Renard B, Kavetski D, Kuczera G et al. Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: the challenge of identifying input and structural errors. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46, W05521, 22PP, doi: 10.1029/2009WR008328.
7. Li L, Xia J, Xu C Y et al. Evaluation of the subjective factors of the GLUE method and comparison with the formal Bayesian method in uncertainty assessment of hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 390(3/4): 210-221.
8. Liang Zhongmin. A review of hydrological uncertainty analysis based on Bayesian theory. Advances in Water Science, 2010, 21(2): 274-281.
9. Kavetski D, Kuczera G, Frank S W et al. Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: I. Theory. Water Resources Research, 2006, 42, W03407, doi: 10.1029/2005WR004368.
10. Kavetski D, Kuczera G, Frank S W et al. Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: II. Application. Water Resources Research, 2006, 42, W03408, doi: 10.1029/2005WR004376.
11. Thiemann M, Trosset M, Gupta H et al. Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 2001, 37(10): 2521-2535.
12. Engeland K, Xu C Y, Gottschalk L et al. Assessment uncertainties in a conceptual water balance model using Basyesian methodology. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2005, 50(1): 45-63.
13. Beven K J, Binley A M. The future of distributed hydrological models. Hydrological Processes, 1992, 6: 279-298.
14. Beven K J, Freer J Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modeling of complex environmental systems. Journal of Hydrology, 2001, 249: 11-29.
15. Shu Chang, Liu Suxia, Mo Xingguo et al. Uncertainty analysis of Xin'anjiang model parameter. Geographical Research, 2008, 27(2): 343-352.
16. Montanari A. Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimate (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of the rainfall-runoff simulations. Water Resources Research, 2005, 41(8): W08406.
17. Blasone R S, Vrugt J A. Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. Advances in Water Resources, 2008, 31: 630-648.
18. Wei Xiaojing, Xiong Lihua, Wan Min et al. Application of Markov Chain Monte Carlo method based modified generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation to hydrological models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 40(4): 464-473.
19. Krzysztofowicz R. Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model. Water Resources Research, 1999, 35(9): 2739-2750.
20. Kuczera G, Kavetski D, Franks S et al. Towards a Bayesian total error analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Characterising model error using storm-dependent parameters. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 331, 167-177.
21. Thyer M, Renard B, Kavetski D et al. Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45, W00B14, doi: 10.1029/2008WR006825.
22. Kuczera G, Parent E. Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: The metropolis algorithm. Journal of Hydrology, 1998, 221(1-4): 69-85.
23. Ajami N K, Duan Q Y, Sorooshian S. An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework. Water Resources Research, 2007, 43, W01403, doi: 10.1029/2005WR004745.
24. Cheng Chuntian, Li Xiangyang. A parallel adaptive metropolis algorithm for uncertainty assessment of Xinanjiang model parameters. Engineering Sciences, 2007, 9(9): 47-51.
25. Vrugt J A, Robinson B A. Treatment of uncertainty using ensemble methods: comparison of sequential data assimilation and Bayesian model averaging. Water Resources Research, 2007, 43(1): W01411, doi: 10.1029/2005WR004838.
26. Vrugt J A, Gupta H V, Bouten W et al. Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 2003, 39(8): 1214, doi: 10.1029/2002WR001746.
27. Huang Y, Chen X, Li Y P et al. A fuzzy-based simulation method for modeling hydrological processes under uncertainty. Hydrological Processes, 2010, 24(25): 3718-3732.
28. Montanari A, Brath A. A stochastic approach for assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations. Water Resources Research, 2004, 40, W01106, doi: 10.1029/2003 WR002540.
29. Yu Zhongbo. Principle and Application of Watershed Distributed Hydrological Model. Beijing: Science Press, 2008.
30. Reichle R H, Mclaughlin D B, Entekhabi D. Hydrologic data assimilation with the ensemble kalman filter. Monthly Weather Review, 2002, 130: 103-114.
31. Koren V, Lee H, Seo D. Reducing uncertainties in model initial conditions via variational assimilation of hydrologic and hydrometeorological data into distributed hydrologic models. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2009, abstract#H41F-0961.
32. Kotlarski S, Block A, Bohm U et al. Regional climate model simulations as input for hydrological applications: evaluation of uncertainties. Advances in Geosciences, 2005, 5: 119-125.
33. Ni G H, Wang L, Hu H P. Identification of uncertainty of a physically-based Hydrological model. The 2nd Asia Pacific Association of Hydrology and Water Resources (APHW), 2004, 2: 633-640.
34. Butts M B, Payne J T, Kristensen M et al. An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modeling uncertainty for streamfiow simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 2004, 298: 242-266.
35. Lin Z, Beck B. Error and uncertainty in the structure of a model: Propagating into forecasts. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2009, abstifact#H23L-07.
36. Lakhtakia M N, Yarnal B, Johnson D L et al. A simulation of river-basin response to mesoscale meterological forcing: The Susquehanna river basin experiment (SRBEX). Journal of American Water Resources Association, 1998, (43): 921-937.
37. Chen F, Dudhia J. Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Perm State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Monthly Weather Review, 2001, 129: 569-585.
38. Pappenberger F, Cloke H L, Balsamo G et al. Global runoff routing with the hydrological component of the ECMWF NWP system. International Journal of Climatology, 2009, doi: 10.1002/joc.2028.
39. Hossain F, Anagnostou E N. Assessment of a stochastic interpolation based parameter sampling scheme for efficient uncertainty analysis of hydrologic models. Computers & Geosciences, 2005, 31: 497-512.
40. Duan Q, Ye A, Dai Y. Quantification of parameter uncertainty of the common land model (CoLM). American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2009, abstract#H41F-0968.
41. Su Fengge. Study on the macro-scale hydrological model and its coupling with the land surface processes model. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2001.
42. Fernando T M K G, Maier H R, Dandy G C et al. Assessing prediction uncertainty in the BIGMOD model: A shuffled complex evolution metropolis algorithm approach//Oxley L, Kulasiri D. MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modeling and Simulation. Modeling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, December 2007: 1499-1505.
43. Liang Xiao. Application of Gaussian error propagation principles for assessment of uncertainty in the common land model [D]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University, 2008.
44. Bastidas L A, Gupta H V, Sorooshian S et al. Sensitivity analysis of a land surface scheme using multicriteria methods. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999, 104: 19481-19490.
45. Bijlsma R M, Groenendijk P. Uncertainty analysis at large scales. Water Science & Technology, 2007, 56(6): 1-9.
46. Hou D, Mitchell K, Toth Z et al. The effect of large-scale atmospheric uncertainty on streamflow predictability. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2009, 10(3): 717-733.
47. Yong Bin. Development of land-surface hydrological model TOPX and its coupling study with regional climate model RIEMS [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2007.
48. Gao Yanhong, Chen Guodong, Cui Wenrui. Coupling of enhanced land surface hydrology with atmospheric mesoscale model and its implement in Heihe River Basin. Advances in Earth Science, 2006, 21(12): 1283-1293.
49. Tong C, Graziani F. A practical global sensitivity analysis methodology for multi-physics applications. Computational methods in transport. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineer, 2008, 62: 277-299.
50. Hsieh H. Application of the PSUADE tool for sensitivity analysis of an engineering simulation. UCRL-TR-237205. https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/355680.pdf, 2007.
51. Tong C. Quantifying uncertainty of a soil-foundation structure-interaction system under seismic excitation. UCRL-TR-402883. https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/359763.pdf, 2008.
52. Wemhoff A P, Hsieh H. TNT prout-tompkins kinetics calibration with PSUADE. UCRL-TR-230194. https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/346278.pdf, 2007.
53. Yong Bin. Advances in the coupling study of hydrological models and land-surface models. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2006, 28(6): 961-970.
54. Yin Xiongrui, Xia Jun, Zhang Xiang et al. Recent progress and prospect of the study on uncertainties in hydrological modeling and forecasting. Water Power, 2006, 32(10): 27-31.