Application of Markov Chain Monte Carlo method based modified generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation to hydrological models

Shuili Xuebao/Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Wei, Xiao Jing ^a   Xiong, Li Hua ^a   Wan, Min ^a   Liu, Pan ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Contained ratio; Interval symmetry; Interval width; Morkov Chain Monte Carlo method; Predicted interval

Indexed keywords

CONTAINED RATIO; INTERVAL SYMMETRY; INTERVAL WIDTH; MORKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO METHOD; PREDICTED INTERVAL;

ESTIMATION; GLUES; GLUING; HYDRAULIC MODELS; MARKOV PROCESSES; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

MONTE CARLO METHODS;

EID: 66349117499     PISSN: 05599350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Montanari A. Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations[J]. Water Resources Research, 2005, 41(8): W08406, doi: 10.1029/2004WR003826.
2. Beven K, Freer J. Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modeling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2001, 249: 11-29.
3. Beven K, Binley A. Future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction[J]. Hydrological Processes, 1992, 6(3): 279-298.
4. Mantovan P, Todini E. Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 330: 368-381.
5. Beven K, Smith P, Freer J. Comment on 'Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology' by Pietro Mantovan and Ezio Todini[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2007, 338: 315-318.
6. Thiemann M, Trosset M, Gupta H, Sorooshian S. Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrological models[J]. Water Resources Research, 2001, 37(10): 2521-2535.
7. Vrugt J A, Robinson B A. Treatment of uncertainty using ensemble methods: comparison of sequential data assimilation and Bayesian model averaging[J]. Water Resources Research, 2007, 43(1): W01411, doi: 10.1029/2005WR004838.
8. Vrugt J A, Gupta H V, Bouten W, Sorooshian S. Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization ofhydrologic models[J]. Water Resources Research, 2003, 39(8): 1214, doi: 10.1029/2002WR001746.
9. Vrugt J A, Gupta H V, Bouten W, Sorooshian S. A shuffled complex evolution metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertain assessment of hydrologic model parameters[J]. Water Resources Research, 2003, 39(8): 1201, doi: 10.1029/2002WR001642.
10. Blasone R S, Vrugt J A. Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2008, 31: 630-648.
11. Duan Q, Gupta V K, Sorooshian S. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models[J]. Water Resources Research, 1992, 28(4): 1015-1031.
12. Vrugt J A, Diks C G H, Gupta H V, et al. Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation[J]. Water Resources Research, 2005, 41(1): W01017, doi: 10.1029/2004WR003059.
13. Xiong L H, O'Connor K M. An empirical method to improve the prediction limits of the GLUE methodology in rainfall-runoff modeling[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 349: 115-124.