Associative priming effects with visible, transposed-letter nonwords: JUGDE facilitates COURT

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 481-488

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Palti, Dafna ^b   Gomez, Pablo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Associative priming; Letter coding; Lexical decision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS;

EID: 84857700698     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0271-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bentin, S., Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1993). Electrophysiological evidence for task effects on semantic priming in auditory word processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 161-169.
2. Bourassa, D. C., & Besner, D. (1998). When do nonwords activate semantics? Implications for models in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26, 61-74.
3. Bruner, J. S., & O'Dowd, D. (1958). A note on the informativeness of parts of words. Language and Speech, 1, 98-101.
4. Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2007). ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: Are consonants processed differently from vowels? Neuroscience Letters, 419, 219-224.
5. Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713-758.
6. Drieghe, D., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 951-961.
7. Duñabeitia, J. A., Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2008). Are coffee and toffee served in a cup? Ortho-phonologically mediated associative priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1861-1872.
8. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2009). There is no clam with coats in the calm coast: Delimiting the transposed-letter priming effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1930-1947.
9. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
10. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601.
11. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1-24). New York: Nova Science.
12. Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 285-294.
13. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 123, 107-128.
14. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
15. O'Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 78-92.
16. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
17. Perea, M., & Fraga, I. (2006). Transposed-letter and laterality effects in lexical decision. Brain and Language, 97, 102-109.
18. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829-841.
19. Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2002). Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies? Acta Psychologica, 110, 103-124.
20. Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 301-314.
21. Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 785-794.
22. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There is a cost. Psychological Science, 17, 192-193.
23. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.
24. Yap, M. J., Tse, C.-S., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency: The role of lexical integrity. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 303-325.